How does the expense ratio of VTWG compare to that of VTWO?

Both VTWG and VTWO have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options for investors. The expense ratio represents the annual fees as a percentage of the fund’s assets, affecting the overall return on investment. Since both funds have identical expense ratios, cost-focused investors should look at other factors, such as the fund’s performance and alignment with their investment goals, to make an informed decision.

How do the net assets of VTWG and VTWO compare, and why does this matter?

VTWG has net assets of $1.4 billion, whereas VTWO has significantly more at $16.9 billion. Higher net assets can indicate greater liquidity, which might lead to tighter bid-ask spreads and easier trading. For investors, this can mean lower transaction costs when buying or selling shares. However, the choice should also consider other factors like the fund’s objective, holdings, and alignment with individual investment goals. Both funds have the same expense ratio of 0.06%, so cost is not a differentiating factor.

What are the key differences in the investment strategies of VTWG and VTWO?

VTWG focuses on small-cap growth companies, providing investors with exposure to firms expected to outperform in terms of revenue and earnings growth. Its low dividend yield of 0.63% may suit those prioritising capital appreciation over income. Conversely, VTWO offers a blend of growth and value in small-cap stocks, leading to a higher dividend yield of 1.13%. It’s designed for investors seeking a more balanced approach. Both funds have a 0.06% expense ratio and share several top holdings, such as FROG and MOG.A, indicating similar market exposure.

How do the top 10 holdings of VTWG and VTWO compare?

Both VTWG and VTWO share several top holdings, including FROG, MOG.A, GKOS, EAT, BTSG, KRYS, PTGX, and TWST. These common positions highlight a significant degree of overlap in the underlying companies, even though their overall strategies may differ. This overlap suggests both funds have similar exposure to small-cap companies with potential growth and stability. The top holdings' weights can help assess diversification levels and understand how the funds might perform under similar market conditions. However, the exact allocation within the funds can vary, influencing the overall performance.

What are the tracking characteristics of VTWG and VTWO, and how do they relate to their benchmarks?

Both VTWG and VTWO are designed to closely follow the performance of their underlying indices. The expense ratio is 0.06% for both funds, but the specific index they track is not available. Despite this, both funds are expected to have a low tracking error, which means their performance should align well with their respective benchmarks. For investors, this is important as it indicates how faithfully the fund mirrors the index, affecting overall returns. Additionally, both funds share several top holdings, suggesting similar market exposure.

How do the dividend yields of VTWG and VTWO compare, and what does this mean for investors?

VTWG has a dividend yield of 0.63%, while VTWO has a higher dividend yield of 1.13%. This difference can be significant for income-focused investors, as a higher yield generally means more frequent and larger dividend payments. However, a lower yield, like that of VTWG, may indicate a focus on capital growth rather than immediate income. Both funds have a low expense ratio of 0.06% and a high number of holdings, providing broad diversification.

How do VTWG and VTWO fit into the broader market, and what sectors do they cover?

Both VTWG and VTWO are designed to provide exposure to the small-cap segment of the market, but their sector weights are not available. This makes it difficult to precisely assess their industry diversification. However, they both have a low expense ratio of 0.06% and a high number of holdings, suggesting broad market coverage. For investors, it's important to understand how each fund's holdings align with different market sectors and how these sectors perform during various economic conditions. Sector diversification can help mitigate risk and potentially enhance returns.

How do the expense ratios and net assets of VTWG and VTWO compare?

Both VTWG and VTWO have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them highly competitive in terms of cost. However, VTWG has net assets of $1.4 billion, while VTWO has significantly more at $16.9 billion. Larger net assets can lead to lower transaction costs due to higher liquidity, which may benefit investors. Despite the difference in size, the identical expense ratio means both funds offer similar cost efficiency. Investors should consider how the fund’s size and expense ratio align with their investment goals and market exposure needs.

What are the pros and cons of VTWG and VTWO, and how do these factors influence the choice?

VTWG offers low expenses, a high number of holdings for broad diversification, and a focus on small-cap growth companies, making it ideal for investors seeking high growth potential. Its low tracking error ensures it closely follows its underlying index. However, the slightly higher dividend yield may not suit income-focused investors, and the high number of holdings could reduce exposure to top performers. On the other hand, VTWO provides a balanced approach with a focus on small-cap blend companies, a higher dividend yield, and a lower expense ratio. It is suitable for those looking for a mix of growth and value, though the lower dividend yield may not appeal to all.

How do the dividend distributions of VTWG and VTWO work, and what should investors know?

Both VTWG and VTWO distribute dividends to their shareholders, but the yields differ. VTWG has a dividend yield of 0.63%, while VTWO has a higher yield of 1.13%. Investors should note that a higher yield generally means more frequent and larger dividend payments, which can be beneficial for those seeking regular income. However, it’s important to remember that dividend yields can fluctuate and are not guaranteed. Both funds have a low expense ratio of 0.06%, and the exact distribution schedule and amount can vary based on the underlying holdings' performance.

What is the inception date of VTWG and VTWO, and how does it compare?

Both VTWG and VTWO were launched on September 20, 2010. This means they have been operating for the same duration, providing a long track record for investors to analyse. Having a similar inception date can help in comparing their historical performance and tracking error over the same period. Both funds have a low expense ratio of 0.06% and share several top holdings, indicating similar market exposure and investment strategies. Investors should consider how each fund aligns with their own goals, regardless of the inception date.

VTWG vs VTWO

Q: What are Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF?

VTWG is an exchange-traded fund focused on small-cap growth companies, aiming for high growth potential. It has a low expense ratio of 0.06%, net assets of $1.4 billion, and a dividend yield of 0.63%. VTWO is an exchange-traded fund focused on small-cap blend companies, offering a balanced approach. It also has a low expense ratio of 0.06%, but significantly more net assets at $16.9 billion, and a higher dividend yield of 1.13%. Both funds share several top holdings, including FROG and MOG.A.

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare VTWG and VTWO on fees, holdings, dividends and market tracking. This page outlines key differences between Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

VTWG

Metric

VTWO

0.06%

Expense Ratio

0.06%

0.63%

Dividend Yield

1.13%

$1.44B

Net Assets

$16.86B

1,141

Holdings

2,002

Sep 20, 2010

Inception Date

Sep 20, 2010

–

Index Tracked

–

Small Growth

Fund Category

Small Blend

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	VTWG	VTWO
FROGJFrog Ltd.	0.68%	0.34%
MOG.AMoog Inc.	0.66%	0.33%
GKOSGlaukos Corporation	0.64%	0.32%
EATBrinker International, Inc.	0.62%	0.31%
BTSGBrightSpring Health Services, Inc.	0.59%	0.30%
KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.	0.58%	0.29%
PTGXProtagonist Therapeutics, Inc.	0.56%	0.28%
TWSTTwist Bioscience Corporation	0.56%	0.28%

Discover More Comparisons

VTWG vs VTWV

Compare VTWG and VTWV ETFs. Both charge 0.06%. VTWV yields 1.64%; VTWG yields 0.63%. Holdings and index tracking data details for both funds.

IWM vs VTWO

Compare IWM vs VTWO. VTWO has a lower expense ratio of 0.06% vs 0.19%. Check yields (1.13% vs 0.96%), net assets and shared top-10 holdings between funds.

VB vs VTWO

Compare VB and VTWO, two Vanguard small-cap ETFs. Review 0.03% vs 0.06% fees, holdings, yields, and tracking differences for informed research.

Investment Analysis

VTWG

Pros

The fund offers low expenses and a high number of holdings, providing broad diversification.
This fund is ideal for investors who want high growth potential, as it focuses on small-cap growth companies.
The fund has a low tracking error, indicating that it closely follows the performance of its underlying index.

Considerations

The fund has a slightly higher dividend yield compared to other ETFs, which is not suitable for income-focused investors.
The fund has a low expense ratio compared to other ETFs, which is not suitable for cost-focused investors.
The fund has a high number of holdings, which may result in lower concentration and less exposure to top-performing stocks.

VTWO

Pros

The fund offers low expenses and a high number of holdings, providing broad diversification.
This fund is ideal for investors who want a balanced approach, as it focuses on small-cap blend companies.
The fund has a low tracking error, indicating that it closely follows the performance of its underlying index.

Considerations

The fund has a lower dividend yield compared to other ETFs, which is not suitable for income-focused investors.
The fund has a low expense ratio compared to other ETFs, which is not suitable for cost-focused investors.
The fund has a high number of holdings, which may result in lower concentration and less exposure to top-performing stocks.

About VTWG and VTWO

VTWG (VTWG)

The Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) is designed to track the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index, focusing on the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe with higher expected growth rates. With an inception date of September 20, 2010, this fund holds approximately 1,141 companies and maintains a competitive expense ratio of 0.06%. It currently holds net assets of USD 1.44 billion and offers a dividend yield of 0.63%. As a Small Growth category fund, VTWG provides investors with broad exposure to emerging innovative companies, though it is important to note that small-cap stocks can be more volatile than large-cap equivalents. Investors should consider that values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed.

VTWO (VTWO)

The Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF aims to track the performance of small-cap companies in the United States. With an expense ratio of just 0.06%, it offers a cost-effective way for investors to gain broad exposure to this sector. The fund holds over 2,000 securities, providing diversification across many different small businesses. Since its inception in September 2010, it has grown to manage approximately USD 16.86 billion in net assets. It currently offers a dividend yield of 1.13%, which may fluctuate based on market conditions and company payouts. As with any investment involving small-cap stocks, values can be more volatile than those of larger companies, so it's important to consider your personal risk tolerance. This ETF is designed for general educational purposes to help you understand how small-cap market segments operate within a portfolio.

Buy VTWG or VTWO in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

VTWG vs VTWO

Fund Snapshot