What is the primary difference between a broad market ETF and a sector ETF?

A broad market ETF, like Fund A, tracks a wide index such as the S&P 500, providing exposure across many sectors and hundreds of large companies. In contrast, a sector ETF, like Fund B, focuses exclusively on a specific industry segment, such as consumer cyclicals. While the broad market fund aims to replicate the overall economy's performance, the sector fund targets a narrower slice of the market. This means Fund B’s performance is driven by industry-specific trends rather than general market movements, offering a more specialised investment vehicle for those looking to tilt their portfolio towards a particular economic theme.

How do expense ratios impact long-term investment returns?

The expense ratio is an annual fee charged by the fund provider to manage the investment. Fund A has a 0.03% expense ratio, while Fund B charges 0.08%. This difference of 0.05 percentage points may seem small, but over long periods, higher fees can reduce the compounding effect of returns. When comparing the two, Fund A is generally more cost-effective. However, investors must also consider the fund's structure and holdings. Since Fund B is a sector-specific ETF, its slightly higher fee is typical for targeted exposure compared to a broad blend fund. Understanding these costs helps in evaluating the net return potential of each ETF.

Why is tracking information important when comparing ETFs?

Tracking information reveals how closely an ETF mimics its intended benchmark index. Unfortunately, the specific index tracked information is not available for either Fund A or Fund B based on the provided data. Generally, investors look for funds with a strong history of adhering to their mandate to ensure they are buying what they think they are. Without this data, one must rely on other metrics such as category and holdings. Fund A is categorised as Large Blend, implying broad exposure, whereas Fund B is Consumer Cyclical. This categorisation helps infer the underlying strategy despite the missing index details.

What is the size comparison between the two funds?

Fund A is significantly larger, managing $1.08 trillion in net assets, compared to Fund B's $21.8 billion. The massive size of Fund A reflects its role as a core holding for many investors seeking broad market exposure. Fund B, while smaller, still maintains substantial liquidity and stability with nearly two decades of operation since its 1998 inception. Size can influence trading volume and liquidity, with larger funds often offering tighter bid-ask spreads. However, both funds have established track records that support their suitability for various portfolio strategies, depending on whether an investor seeks general market growth or sector-specific performance.

How do the dividend yields of these two ETFs compare?

Fund A offers a dividend yield of 1.03%, while Fund B provides a slightly lower yield of 0.83%. These figures represent the annual dividend payout relative to the share price. It is important to note that dividend yields fluctuate as share prices change and do not indicate the total return of the investment. Fund A's yield is typical for a large-cap blend fund, balancing growth and income. Fund B's yield is consistent with its focus on consumer cyclicals, which often prioritise capital appreciation over high income distribution. Investors should consider yield as one factor among many in their analysis.

What are the top holdings for each fund?

Fund A’s top ten holdings include major technology and communication services giants such as NVDA at 8.08%, AAPL at 7.03%, and MSFT at 5.70%. In contrast, Fund B focuses heavily on consumer discretionary leaders, with AMZN comprising 23.36% and TSLA at 17.79% of the portfolio. While both funds hold AMZN and TSLA, the weightings differ significantly. Fund A provides diversified exposure across various sectors with smaller individual holdings, whereas Fund B has high single-stock concentration in two major names. This distinction is critical for understanding the risk profile, as Fund B's performance is heavily dependent on these two companies.

Which stocks are shared in the top ten of both funds?

AMZN and TSLA appear in the top ten holdings for both Fund A and Fund B. However, their influence on each fund varies dramatically due to different weighting structures. In Fund A, AMZN represents 3.84% and TSLA 1.57%, contributing to a broader diversification. In Fund B, these same companies constitute 23.36% and 17.79% respectively, meaning they drive a substantial portion of the fund's performance. This overlap means that movements in Amazon and Tesla will affect both funds, but the impact will be much more pronounced on Fund B due to its concentrated sector approach. Investors should recognise this correlation when holding both ETFs simultaneously.

How does concentration risk differ between the two ETFs?

Concentration risk refers to the potential impact of a single holding or sector on the overall fund performance. Fund A exhibits moderate concentration in technology leaders, with its top two holdings NVDA and AAPL accounting for 8.08% and 7.03%. Fund B, however, shows high single-stock concentration, with its top two holdings AMZN and TSLA making up over 40% of the total fund value. This means Fund B is significantly more vulnerable to specific risks associated with Amazon and Tesla. If these two companies underperform, Fund B will likely suffer more than Fund A, which has a more balanced spread across 500 companies.

What investment goal is each ETF typically associated with?

Fund A is typically associated with core portfolio allocation, offering broad exposure to the US large-cap equity market through a low-cost, diversified structure. It suits investors seeking general market growth over time. Fund B is often used for tactical asset allocation or sector tilting, providing targeted exposure to consumer cyclical companies. It suits investors who believe the consumer discretionary sector will outperform the broader market. Neither fund is inherently better; they serve different purposes. Fund A acts as a foundation, while Fund B can be a specialised overlay. Understanding these distinct roles helps in aligning the ETF choice with specific investment strategies and risk tolerance levels.

Are sector weights available for comparison between these funds?

Sector weights are not available from the fund data provided for either Fund A or Fund B. This lack of detailed sector breakdown prevents a precise numerical comparison of how much each fund is allocated to specific industries beyond their top holdings. However, the fund categories give a general indication: Fund A is a Large Blend, suggesting a mix of growth and value across sectors, while Fund B is Consumer Cyclical, indicating a primary focus on non-essential consumer goods and services. Investors requiring granular sector data should consult official fund documents or provider websites for the most current weightings.

What educational resources should be consulted before investing?

Before making any investment decisions, it is crucial to consult official prospectuses and fund fact sheets from the issuers, Vanguard for Fund A and SPDR for Fund B. These documents provide comprehensive details on risks, fees, and holdings that may not be captured in summary comparisons. Additionally, understanding your own risk tolerance and time horizon is essential. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investments in the stock market carry risks, including the potential loss of principal. Always perform due diligence or consult with a qualified financial professional to ensure any ETF choice aligns with your personal financial goals and circumstances.

VOO vs XLY

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare VOO and XLY: S&P 500 Vanguard ETF vs Consumer Discret Sel Sect SPDR ETF. This page reviews fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio and 1.03% yield, while XLY has 0.08% and 0.83%. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare VOO and XLY: S&P 500 Vanguard ETF vs Consumer Discret Sel Sect SPDR ETF. This page reviews fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio and 1.03...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

VOO

Metric

XLY

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.08%

1.03%

Dividend Yield

0.83%

$1.08T

Net Assets

$21.78B

516

Holdings

50

Sep 7, 2010

Inception Date

Dec 16, 1998

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Consumer Cyclical

VOO costs about $5.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	VOO	XLY
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	3.84%	23.36%
TSLATesla, Inc.	1.57%	17.79%

Discover More Comparisons

VOO vs VXF

Compare VOO vs VXF on fees, holdings and dividends. VOO is 0.03%, VXF 0.05%. Both yield 1.03%. Shared top-10 holdings are none. Index tracking unavailable.

VOO vs VUG

Compare VOO and VUG. Examine 0.03% expense ratios, dividend yields, top holdings and market segment tracking to understand their structural differences.

VOO vs VPU

Compare VOO and VPU. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking data. Neutral analysis of US large blend and utilities ETFs for investor research.

Investment Analysis

VOO

Pros

VOO offers a low 0.03% expense ratio and manages $1.08 trillion in assets.
The fund’s broad large-cap blend mandate provides access to the US equity market.
VOO’s long history since 2010 and strong issuer reputation support investor confidence.

Considerations

Index tracked information is not available from the fund data provided.
Sector weights are not available from the fund data provided.
Concentration remains in technology-heavy leaders, with NVDA at 8.08% and AAPL at 7.03%.

XLY

Pros

XLY provides targeted exposure to consumer cyclical companies through the SPDR range.
The fund’s 0.08% expense ratio remains competitive for a sector-specific equity ETF.
XLY’s 21.8 billion net assets and 1998 inception support liquidity and stability.

Considerations

XLY shows high single-stock concentration, with AMZN at 23.36% and TSLA at 17.79%.
Index tracked information is not available from the fund data provided.
Sector weights are not available from the fund data provided.

Related Market Insights

The Tokenisation Revolution: Why Global Asset Access Is About to Change Everything

Explore the Tokenisation Revolution Neme. Invest in companies building infrastructure for global asset access, fractional ownership, and borderless finance.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

The Tokenisation Revolution: Why Global Asset Access Is About to Change Everything

Explore the Tokenisation Revolution Neme. Invest in companies building infrastructure for global asset access, fractional ownership, and borderless finance.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About VOO and XLY

VOO (VOO)

VOO is Vanguard’s exchange-traded fund designed to track the S&P 500 Index, offering broad exposure to about 500 of the largest publicly traded US companies. It aims to replicate the index’s performance minus fees by holding the same stocks in similar proportions, making it a straightforward, passive way to access large‑cap US equities. Investors commonly use VOO as a core holding for long‑term growth or as a simple building block in a diversified portfolio. It typically offers high liquidity and regular dividend distributions from underlying companies. As with any equity investment, VOO’s value can rise or fall with the market, and past performance is not a guide to future returns. Fees, trading costs and potential tracking error reduce returns slightly. This information is general and educational only and not personalised financial advice — consider your own circumstances or speak to a qualified adviser before investing.

XLY (XLY)

XLY (Consumer Discret Sel Sect SPDR ETF) is a sector-focused exchange-traded fund that provides targeted exposure to US consumer discretionary companies — firms in retail, leisure, autos, media and related services. As a sector ETF, it concentrates on businesses whose revenues are sensitive to consumer spending and economic cycles, so it tends to be more growth-oriented and can be more volatile than broad-market funds. Investors use XLY to gain concentrated exposure to trends in retail, e-commerce, travel and durable goods, or to express a view on consumer demand. Because it focuses on a single sector, diversification is limited and performance can swing with the economic cycle. This summary is for educational purposes only and not personalised advice. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and the ETF’s suitability for your portfolio; values and income can fall as well as rise.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Tokenized World: Global Asset Access

Invest in companies revolutionizing how we access global assets through blockchain technology. These carefully selected stocks represent leaders enabling the tokenization of real-world assets, from trading platforms to the infrastructure that makes it all possible.

Published: 1 July 2025

Explore Basket