What is the main difference between VGT and VTI?

VGT is a sector ETF focused exclusively on the technology sector, aiming to capture performance within that specific industry. In contrast, VTI is a broad-market ETF that tracks the entire US stock market, including large, mid, and small-cap companies across all sectors. While both are managed by Vanguard, their objectives differ significantly: VGT offers concentrated exposure to technology, whereas VTI provides diversified exposure to the overall market. Investors often choose between them based on whether they prefer specific sector bets or general market participation.

How do ETF fees and expense ratios work?

An expense ratio represents the annual cost of managing an ETF, expressed as a percentage of your investment. This fee covers operational costs like administration and tracking. For instance, Fund A has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while Fund B is 0.03%. Over time, higher fees can reduce net returns, making it crucial to compare these figures. While ETFs trade like stocks, their ongoing costs are deducted from assets daily, affecting the share price and dividend distributions. Always review the expense ratio to understand the true cost of ownership.

What does 'tracking' mean for these ETFs?

Tracking refers to how closely an ETF follows the performance of its benchmark index. Fund B tracks the total US stock market, providing broad representation across sectors and capitalisations. Fund A tracks the US information technology sector, focusing solely on technology-related companies. The provided data states the specific index tracked is 'not available' for both, but their categories indicate their targets. Effective tracking ensures the fund mirrors its intended market segment, minimizing tracking error, which is the divergence between the fund's performance and its benchmark.

How do the expense ratios of VGT and VTI compare?

When evaluating costs, Fund B has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to Fund A's 0.09%. This means Fund B is 0.06 percentage points cheaper to hold annually. While this difference seems small, over long investment horizons, compounding effects can make lower fees advantageous for broad-market strategies. Fund A's higher fee reflects the specialised management required for sector targeting. Investors should weigh the cost difference against the desired exposure: lower costs for general market access versus a premium for targeted technology sector exposure.

What is the overlap in top holdings between these two funds?

There is significant overlap in the top ten holdings due to the large market capitalisation of technology companies. Both funds include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO, and MU as shared top holdings. However, their weighting differs: in Fund A, NVDA is 17.74% and AAPL is 15.80%, whereas in Fund B, NVDA is 6.87% and AAPL is 6.30%. Fund B also includes non-technology giants like AMZN and GOOGL, which are not in Fund A's top ten, reflecting its broader market mandate.

How do the dividend yields of VGT and VTI differ?

Fund B currently offers a higher dividend yield of 1.02% compared to Fund A's 0.34%. This difference arises because technology companies often prioritise growth and share buybacks over large cash distributions, whereas the broader market includes sectors like financials and industrials that pay more regular dividends. Dividend yields fluctuate based on share prices and declared payouts. While Fund B provides more income via dividends, Fund A's lower yield aligns with its growth-oriented sector focus. Income preferences may influence which fund suits an investor's strategy.

Which investment goals are typically associated with VGT?

Fund A is typically associated with investors seeking targeted exposure to the technology sector. This fund suits those who believe technology companies will outperform the broader market or wish to actively manage their sector allocation. However, it carries higher concentration risk, as performance depends heavily on a few large holdings like NVDA and AAPL. It is not designed for full-market diversification. Investors use such sector ETFs to enhance portfolio growth potential or hedge specific industry views, accepting volatility in exchange for concentrated technological exposure.

Which investment goals are typically associated with VTI?

Fund B is typically associated with a core portfolio holding due to its broad diversification across the entire US stock market. It suits investors seeking a passive, long-term approach that captures general economic growth without betting on specific sectors. With massive net assets of $692.2 billion, it offers liquidity and stability. By including large, mid, and small-cap stocks across all industries, it reduces single-sector risk. This fund is often used as a foundational component for retirement accounts or general wealth accumulation strategies requiring comprehensive market participation.

How do net assets influence ETF choice?

Net assets indicate the size and liquidity of an ETF. Fund B has significantly more net assets at $692.2 billion compared to Fund A's $150.2 billion. Larger funds generally offer better liquidity, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower risk of closure. Both are well-established Vanguard funds, so liquidity is unlikely to be an issue. However, the scale of Fund B reflects its role as a primary market benchmark, while Fund A's size indicates strong investor interest in technology. Asset size can impact operational efficiency and cost structures.

What should beginners know before comparing these ETFs?

Beginners should understand that comparing ETFs requires looking beyond simple fees. While Fund B is cheaper, Fund A offers different exposure. Check inception dates: Fund B launched in 2001, and Fund A in 2004, providing long-term track records. Analyze top holdings to see concentration; Fund A is heavier on tech, while Fund B is diversified. Consider your risk tolerance and income needs. Use this data to understand how each fund fits your portfolio strategy, ensuring you grasp the underlying market segments before making any decisions.

VGT vs VTI

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF). Examine fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

VGT

Metric

VTI

0.09%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

0.34%

Dividend Yield

1.02%

$150.23B

Net Assets

$692.20B

323

Holdings

3,514

Jan 26, 2004

Inception Date

May 24, 2001

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Large Blend

VTI costs about $6.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	VGT	VTI
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	17.74%	6.87%
AAPLApple Inc.	15.80%	6.30%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	11.52%	5.10%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	4.52%	2.37%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	4.18%	1.46%

Discover More Comparisons

VGT vs XLK

Compare VGT vs XLK technology ETFs. Review fees, dividend yields, and holdings. Note: 0.09% vs 0.08% expense ratios. Educational content only.

VGT vs VUG

Compare VGT and VUG on fees, holdings, and dividends. VGT expense 0.09%, VUG 0.03%. Both launched 2004. Examine tracking and concentration for research.

SPY vs VTI

Compare SPY and VTI ETFs. Analyze expense ratios (0.09% vs 0.03%), dividend yields, top holdings, and net assets to decide which fund suits your research goals.

Investment Analysis

VGT

Pros

],
cons
stock_2

Considerations

]
pros
stock_1

VTI

Pros

],
cons
stock_1

Considerations

]
pros
stock_2

About VGT and VTI

VGT (VGT)

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) aims to provide investors with exposure to companies operating in the technology sector, encompassing both US and international firms. As a broad market fund, it seeks to track the performance of the technology industry by holding a diversified basket of over 300 stocks. With a low expense ratio of 0.09%, it offers a cost-efficient way to gain access to major tech players. Investors should note that while the fund offers potential growth tied to technological innovation, it is heavily concentrated in the technology sector. This concentration means its value can fluctuate significantly based on sector-specific trends, regulatory changes, and market sentiment. Returns are not guaranteed, and values can rise and fall, making it suitable for those who understand the risks associated with sector-focused investing.

VTI (VTI)

This ETF offers broad exposure to the US equity market by tracking a comprehensive index of publicly traded companies. Designed as a large blend fund, it holds thousands of individual stocks, ranging from massive multinational corporations to smaller domestic firms. With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, it aims to provide cost-efficient long-term growth potential. The fund has a dividend yield of approximately 1.02%, reflecting the aggregate distributions from its holdings. Investors often consider this vehicle for core portfolio diversification, though it is essential to remember that stock market investments carry inherent risks, and values can fluctuate. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and returns are not guaranteed.

Buy VGT or VTI in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

VGT vs VTI

Fund Snapshot