

VFH vs VOO
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.
Compare Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and S&P 500 Vanguard ETF (VOO). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. VFH focuses on financial sector stocks while VOO targets large-cap US equities. Educational content, not financial advice.
Compare Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and S&P 500 Vanguard ETF (VOO). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. VFH focuses on financial sector stocks while VOO...
Investment Analysis

VFH
VFH
Pros
- The fund tracks the financials sector with a competitive expense ratio of 0.09%.
- It provides substantial exposure to major financial institutions and payments companies.
- The dividend yield of 1.70% offers income potential for investors.
Considerations
- Its net assets of $13.1 billion are much smaller than Vanguard's core index funds.
- The lack of publicly available index tracking details creates uncertainty regarding its methodology.
- The top 10 holdings represent a large percentage of the fund, leading to significant concentration risk.

VOO
VOO
Pros
- It offers low-cost exposure to the broad large-cap US market with a 0.03% expense ratio.
- The fund has accumulated significant assets, reaching a total of $1.08 trillion.
- Being a well-established, large blend index fund, it has a long track record and high liquidity.
Considerations
- Its dividend yield of 1.03% is relatively modest compared to income-focused sector funds.
- The top 10 holdings are heavily concentrated in the technology and consumer services sectors.
- Specific details regarding the fund's index tracking methodology are not available.
Buy VFH or VOO in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.


