What is an ETF expense ratio?

An expense ratio is an annual fee charged by an ETF issuer to manage the fund, expressed as a percentage of your investment. For stock_1, this is 0.15%, while stock_2 charges 0.09%. This difference means stock_2 is 0.06 percentage points cheaper annually. These fees reduce your net return over time, making them a critical factor when comparing funds with similar underlying strategies. Lower ratios generally benefit long-term holders.

What does 'net assets' mean for an ETF?

Net assets, or assets under management (AUM), represent the total market value of the investments held by the fund. stock_2 has $785.0 billion in net assets, far exceeding stock_1's $18.6 billion. Larger funds often have higher liquidity, resulting in tighter bid-ask spreads. This makes stock_2 easier to trade in large volumes without significantly impacting its price, whereas stock_1 may have slightly wider spreads due to its smaller size.

What is a dividend yield?

Dividend yield indicates how much a fund pays out in dividends relative to its share price, expressed as a percentage. stock_1 offers a 1.03% yield, while stock_2 offers 0.98%. Although both are modest, stock_1 provides slightly more income per dollar invested. Dividends are typically paid quarterly or monthly. Investors should note that yield can fluctuate based on share price and dividend payments, so it is not a guaranteed return.

How do the top holdings of these two ETFs compare?

The top holdings reveal different portfolio concentrations. stock_2 is heavily weighted towards technology, with NVDA at 8.16% and AAPL at 7.44%. In contrast, stock_1's largest holdings include MA (5.81%), AAPL (5.80%), and V (5.75%). AAPL appears in the top ten for both. However, stock_1 includes greater exposure to Mastercard and Visa, while stock_2 holds larger positions in Microsoft and Amazon, reflecting their distinct index compositions.

Which fund is more cost-efficient for long-term investing?

Based on the provided data, stock_2 is more cost-efficient due to its lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to stock_1's 0.15%. Over long periods, this 0.06 percentage point difference can compound, resulting in higher net returns for stock_2, assuming identical investment performance. Beginners often prioritise lower costs to minimise fee drag. However, cost is just one factor; investors must also consider the fund's strategy and tracking error alongside fees.

What are the key similarities in their portfolio composition?

Both stock_1 and stock_2 are categorised as Large Blend funds, targeting US large-cap stocks. AAPL is the only shared holding within their respective top ten positions. While both hold major US corporations, their weighting differs significantly. stock_2 tracks the broader S&P 500, while stock_1 applies a quality screen, leading to divergent top holdings like NVDA and MSFT in stock_2 versus MA and V in stock_1.

How does single-name concentration risk differ between the funds?

stock_2 holds NVDA as its largest position at 8.16%, creating notable concentration in a single technology stock. Conversely, stock_1's largest holding is MA at 5.81%. While both funds carry concentration risk inherent to market-cap weighted indices, stock_2's top position is weighted higher than stock_1's. This means stock_2's performance may be more sensitive to fluctuations in NVDA's share price compared to stock_1's sensitivity to Mastercard.

Which fund has a longer operational history?

stock_2 was established in January 1993, making it significantly older than stock_1, which launched in December 2005. This nearly thirteen-year difference gives stock_2 a longer operational track record. For beginners, a longer history can provide more data points to analyse performance across different market cycles. However, past performance is not indicative of future results, and both funds have been operating long enough to demonstrate consistent management practices.

What index do these funds track?

The provided data does not specify the exact indices tracked by either fund. stock_2 is associated with the S&P 500 ETF Trust SPDR, suggesting broad market exposure. stock_1 is the Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, implying a quality-factor tilt within the S&P 500. Since the specific index names are not available in the dataset, investors should consult the fund fact sheets for precise tracking details and methodology descriptions.

What are the sector weights for these funds?

The provided ground truth states that sector weights are not available for either stock_1 or stock_2. Without this data, a direct comparison of their exposure to industries like Technology, Healthcare, or Financials cannot be made from this dataset alone. Investors typically expect a quality-screened fund like stock_1 to have different sector allocations than a broad market fund like stock_2, but specific weights must be sourced from current official documentation.

How should beginners interpret the difference in dividend yields?

The dividend yields are similar: 1.03% for stock_1 and 0.98% for stock_2. This 0.05 percentage point difference is negligible for most beginner investors focused on growth. Neither fund is considered a high-income ETF. Beginners should understand that ETF distributions come from underlying stock dividends and can vary. If income is the primary goal, both funds offer minimal yield, suggesting they are better suited for capital appreciation strategies rather than income generation.

Why is liquidity important when comparing these ETFs?

Liquidity, indicated by net assets and trading volume, affects how easily you can buy or sell shares. stock_2 has $785.0 billion in assets versus stock_1's $18.6 billion, suggesting stock_2 has higher liquidity. This typically results in tighter bid-ask spreads for stock_2, reducing trading costs for frequent traders. For buy-and-hold investors, liquidity is less critical but still important for exiting positions quickly without price impact. Educational content only.

SPHQ vs SPY

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SPY (S&P 500 ETF Trust SPDR) to review fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. SPHQ charges 0.15% versus 0.09% for SPY. Net assets are $18.6 billion and $785.0 billion, with dividend yields of 1.03% and 0.98%. Top holdings differ, though AAPL appears in both lists. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SPY (S&P 500 ETF Trust SPDR) to review fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. SPHQ charges 0.15% versus 0.09% for SPY. Net assets...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SPHQ

Metric

SPY

0.15%

Expense Ratio

0.09%

1.03%

Dividend Yield

0.98%

$18.62B

Net Assets

$785.05B

102

Holdings

505

Dec 6, 2005

Inception Date

Jan 22, 1993

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Blend

SPY costs about $6.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	SPHQ	SPY
AAPLApple Inc.	5.80%	7.44%

Discover More Comparisons

SPHQ vs VOO

Compare SPHQ vs VOO on expenses, holdings and yields. Both 1.03% yield; fees differ 0.15% vs 0.03%. Assess large blend strategies for informed research.

SPHQ vs VTV

Compare SPHQ vs VTV on fees, holdings, and dividends. Review net assets, yields, and inception dates. Learn differences between Quality and Value funds.

SPHQ vs SPMO

Compare SPHQ and SPMO ETFs. Review 0.15% and 0.13% fees, $18.6bn and $28.9bn assets, 1.03% and 0.72% yields, and key holdings for informed research.

Investment Analysis

SPHQ

Pros

Fund holds 18.6 billion in net assets, indicating substantial liquidity for trading purposes.
The 15% expense ratio provides competitive access to the Invesco quality factor methodology.
Launched in December 2005, the fund has a nearly twenty-year operational track record.

Considerations

The 15% expense ratio is higher than the 9% cost of the benchmark SPY fund.
A 3% dividend yield trails the benchmark's near-equivalent yield, reducing income attraction.
The portfolio concentrates over 3% in Mastercard, potentially limiting sector diversification.

SPY

Pros

The fund's 9% expense ratio is exceptionally low, minimising long-term investor costs.
Net assets total 785 billion, ensuring extremely tight bid-ask spreads and high liquidity.
Established in January 1993, it is the oldest and most liquid US-listed ETF.

Considerations

NVDA constitutes 8% of the portfolio, creating a significant single-name concentration risk.
The 10% dividend yield is modest, limiting income generation for yield-seeking investors.
High correlation with the general large-cap market offers no distinct factor premium.

Related Market Insights

Fed Policy Shift Explained: Defensive Investment Guide

Navigate Fed policy shifts with Nemo's defensive investing guide. Discover stable sectors like consumer staples & healthcare to protect your portfolio amid economic uncertainty.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

5 October 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Fed Policy Shift Explained: Defensive Investment Guide

Navigate Fed policy shifts with Nemo's defensive investing guide. Discover stable sectors like consumer staples & healthcare to protect your portfolio amid economic uncertainty.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

5 October 2025

Read Insight

About SPHQ and SPY

SPHQ (SPHQ)

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks exposure to S&P 500 companies exhibiting quality characteristics such as stronger profitability, stable earnings and lower leverage. It provides investors with a rules-based, diversified way to tilt a large-cap US equity allocation towards firms deemed higher quality within the S&P 500. SPHQ trades like a stock on exchanges, offering intraday liquidity and the convenience of an ETF wrapper, but its share price and NAV can diverge slightly during the trading day. Investors should note this is not an actively managed stockpick — performance follows the underlying index and will rise or fall with market conditions. Consideration should be given to how a quality tilt fits within a broader portfolio, fees, tax treatment and the ETF’s liquidity; past performance does not guarantee future returns and values can go down as well as up.

SPY (SPY)

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an exchange‑traded fund designed to track the S&P 500 index, offering investors broad exposure to large‑capitalisation US equities. It is widely used by retail and institutional investors for core portfolio allocation, tactical trading and hedging because of its deep liquidity and transparent holdings. SPY distributes dividends (typically quarterly) and reflects the performance of the underlying index, so returns move with the US large‑cap market. As with any equity product, value can fall as well as rise and past performance is not a guide to the future. Costs, tax considerations and suitability will depend on an individual’s circumstances; consult official documents and consider seeking independent advice where appropriate. This summary is general educational information and not personalised investment advice.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Fed Policy Shift Explained: Defensive Investment Guide

A recent warning from a top Federal Reserve official about a weakening U.S. job market suggests a cautious approach to future monetary policy. This pivot could create investment opportunities in defensive, high-quality companies that can better withstand economic uncertainty.

Published: 5 October 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Fed Policy Shift Explained: Defensive Investment Guide

A recent warning from a top Federal Reserve official about a weakening U.S. job market suggests a cautious approach to future monetary policy. This pivot could create investment opportunities in defensive, high-quality companies that can better withstand economic uncertainty.

Published: 5 October 2025

Explore Basket

SPHQ vs SPY

Fund Snapshot