How do the expense ratios of SCHX and SPYM compare, and what does this mean for long-term returns?

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, while SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, making SPYM marginally more cost-efficient. While the difference appears minuscule, these fees can accumulate over decades, potentially creating a measurable gap in net asset growth. The fee difference is 0.01%, but its long-term impact on returns is proportional to the total assets held by the investor.

What types of goals do SCHX and SPYM best serve?

Both SCHX and SPYM provide diversified exposure to US large-cap stocks. SCHX may appeal to those prioritising broad large-cap equities with a competitive cost, while SPYM could suit investors who value a longer operational history since 2005 and slightly lower expenses. The choice may depend on how you weigh the importance of index tracking versus cost efficiency.

What are sector weights, and why does their absence in SCHX and SPYM matter?

Sector weights indicate how a fund's assets are distributed across various industries like Technology or Healthcare. Since this data is not available for SCHX and SPYM, it is difficult for investors to assess concentration risks. Without knowing the sector weights, investors cannot fully evaluate how heavily a fund relies on a specific sector to drive performance.

How do the top 10 holdings of SCHX and SPYM compare?

The top 10 holdings for SCHX and SPYM are identical, containing major US companies such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT. However, the weightings differ; for example, NVDA represents 7.69% of SCHX compared to 8.15% of SPYM. This demonstrates that the underlying companies are similar, yet SPYM might have a slightly higher concentration in certain mega-cap stocks like NVDA and AAPL.

What is the significance of SCHX holding 500 stocks?

The JSON context indicates that SCHX holds 500 stocks, offering broad diversification across US large-cap equities. Despite this, the fund's specific index methodology and sector weight details are not available. This suggests that while the fund is designed to spread risk across many large-cap stocks, the exact replication method or distribution of these holdings remains opaque.

Does SCHX's performance history match that of SPYM?

SCHX was launched on 3 November 2009, while SPYM was launched on 8 November 2005. SCHX's shorter history may contribute to less data for comparison. Although SPYM offers a longer track record, the context does not provide detailed information on their relative performance. The absence of this data means investors cannot assess which fund's performance has been more consistent over time.

Are SCHX and SPYM's dividends distributed similarly?

SCHX has a dividend yield of 0.99%, whereas SPYM has a yield of 1.00%, making them very similar in this aspect. Both funds provide a modest income stream for investors. The slight difference in yields reflects the specific holdings, but the overall dividend distribution approach for ETFs typically involves passing on the income from the underlying securities to the shareholders.

What does it mean when an ETF's category is 'not available'?

SCHX is categorised as a 'Large Blend', meaning its investments are a mix of large-cap growth and value stocks. Conversely, SPYM's category is 'not available'. This ambiguity makes it challenging for investors to compare the funds against specific benchmarks. Without a clear categorisation, it's harder to determine exactly how each fund's strategy aligns with a specific investing goal.

How do the fund sizes of SCHX and SPYM compare?

SCHX has net assets of $73.9 billion, while SPYM has a larger asset base of $157.4 billion. In the ETF market, a larger net asset value can sometimes indicate greater liquidity and stability, though it does not directly impact the day-to-day investment experience for the end user. A larger fund size may offer a greater variety of institutional investors.

Is SCHX or SPYM more transparent in its tracking methodology?

Both SCHX and SPYM do not provide details on their specific index tracked, meaning neither fund is more transparent than the other on this metric. Furthermore, SCHX's index methodology details are explicitly noted as not available. This lack of transparency means investors relying on detailed methodology replication data would not find it in either fund's current reporting.

What is the impact of the fund issuers on SCHX and SPYM?

SCHX is managed by Schwab and SPYM by SPDR. The reputational strength of an issuer can influence investor confidence, though this is a qualitative factor and not reflected in the quantitative data. A fund's performance and operational stability are influenced by its issuer's management practices, but these details are outside the scope of the provided data.

Is this FAQ page intended to give financial advice?

No, this content is intended solely for educational purposes to help beginners understand how to interpret ETF comparisons. The analysis of fees, holdings, and other metrics is based on the provided data and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough independent research or consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions.

SCHX vs SPYM

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare the US Large-Cap ETF Schwab (SCHX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). This page analyses fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SCHX

Metric

SPYM

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.02%

0.99%

Dividend Yield

1.00%

$73.93B

Net Assets

$157.41B

750

Holdings

508

Nov 3, 2009

Inception Date

Nov 8, 2005

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

–

SPYM costs about $1.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	SCHX	SPYM
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	7.69%	8.15%
AAPLApple Inc.	7.16%	7.43%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	5.35%	5.55%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	3.56%	3.77%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	2.95%	3.11%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	2.38%	2.57%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	2.35%	2.48%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	2.17%	2.22%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	1.60%	1.74%
TSLATesla, Inc.	1.49%	1.55%

Discover More Comparisons

SCHX vs SPY

Compare SCHX and SPY. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields and top holdings. Understand tracking differences to inform your investment research.

SCHX vs VOO

Compare SCHX and VOO: both charge 0.03%, but SCHX holds 750 US large caps vs 516 in the S&P 500. See the shared top 10, 1.00% vs 1.04% yield and fund size.

SCHX vs VTI

Compare SCHX and VTI. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, and top holdings. Understand index tracking and concentration risks clearly.

Investment Analysis

SCHX

Pros

SCHX carries a 0.03% expense ratio, which remains competitive for broad US large-cap exposure.
It holds 500 stocks, offering broad diversification across US large-cap equities despite lacking full sector weight details.
The fund provides a 0.99% dividend yield, suitable for investors seeking modest income alongside capital appreciation.

Considerations

Tracking index methodology details are not available, reducing transparency for investors focused on specific benchmark replication.
Sector weight data is not available, limiting ability to assess concentration risks within the 500-stock portfolio.
Recent performance may lag alternatives due to higher 0.03% fees compared to 0.02% options like SPYM.

SPYM

Pros

SPYM offers a low 0.02% expense ratio, among the most cost-efficient for US large-cap indexing.
Its 1.00% dividend yield provides steady income while maintaining exposure to major US large-cap equities.
Inception in 2005 gives SPYM a longer operational history, supporting stability and established tracking.

Considerations

No sector weights are disclosed, making it harder to evaluate geographic or industry concentration risks.
The fund's category designation is not available, which may complicate benchmark comparisons for certain investors.
Top holdings overlap significantly with SCHX, suggesting limited differentiation in major stock exposures.

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SCHX and SPYM

SCHX (SCHX)

Schwab US Large‑Cap ETF (SCHX) offers broad exposure to the largest US companies through a single, passively managed fund. It aims to replicate the performance of a large‑cap US equity index, providing diversified access to established names across multiple sectors. SCHX is positioned as a low‑cost core equity holding for investors seeking market‑capitalisation‑weighted large‑cap returns, and it trades on exchanges like a stock. Advantages include simplicity, intraday liquidity and typically lower fees than many active managers. However, like all equity ETFs, its value fluctuates with the market and past performance does not predict future results. SCHX may suit investors looking for long‑term US large‑cap exposure within a diversified portfolio, but it is general information only and not personalised investment advice—suitability depends on individual goals, time horizon and risk tolerance.

SPYM (SPYM)

This ETF aims to track a large-cap US equity benchmark, typically offering diversified exposure to hundreds of major companies. With a low expense ratio of 0.02%, it is designed for cost-efficient long-term portfolio building. It holds a significant amount of net assets, currently reported at approximately USD 157.41 billion, which can indicate liquidity and widespread institutional use. The fund provides exposure across various sectors of the US economy through its holdings, currently numbering around 508 companies. Investors might consider this as a core holding or a satellite position to complement other assets. As with all equity investments, the value of the ETF can fluctuate, and there is no guarantee of profit. It serves as a vehicle for gaining broad market exposure rather than trying to outperform specific stocks.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Following Charles Schwab's massive $20 billion stock buyback and dividend increase, this theme focuses on other financially robust companies that are similarly rewarding their investors. The strategy is to invest in firms with strong cash flows and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Buy SCHX or SPYM in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

SCHX vs SPYM

Fund Snapshot