How do SCHQ and TLT differ in terms of their tracking methodologies?

Both SCHQ and TLT are categorized as Long Government ETFs, but specific index details are not available. While their shared goal involves long-duration US treasuries, the lack of index transparency prevents investors from fully understanding the underlying mechanisms. It remains unclear how each fund tracks its market and whether their tracking differences could lead to varied results despite targeting the same asset class.

What does it mean for both ETFs to report the same top ten holdings?

While SCHQ and TLT do not share specific top ten holdings according to the available data, the concept of similar or overlapping holdings can be indicative of their underlying portfolio composition. For investors, understanding how similar holdings may affect ETF performance is important as it relates to diversification and potential exposure differences.

How do SCHQ and TLT differ in terms of their inception dates?

SCHQ was launched on October 10, 2019, whereas TLT was established on July 22, 2002. These dates are significant because they indicate a long operational history for TLT, offering more extensive historical performance data to investors.

How do the expense ratios of SCHQ and TLT affect my investment costs over time?

SCHQ boasts an expense ratio of 0.03%, while TLT's is 0.15%, creating a difference of 0.12 percentage points. While this fee difference might not seem substantial for smaller investments, over years, it could significantly impact returns. The longer you hold the ETF, the more the expenses could erode your investment's overall profitability.

What does SCHQ and TLT's dividend yield suggest about their income potential?

With SCHQ offering a dividend yield of 4.93% and TLT's yield being 4.76%, SCHQ provides a slightly higher income distribution. These dividends are critical for income-focused investors, as they provide regular cash returns and can significantly influence an investment's attractiveness depending on personal income needs and financial goals.

Why is it important to consider the net assets of SCHQ and TLT?

The net assets of SCHQ stand at $916 million, considerably less than TLT's $46.7 billion. Net assets indicate the size and trading volume of the ETF, influencing liquidity and operational stability. Generally, higher assets suggest better liquidity and lower bid-ask spreads.

Which investing goal aligns better with SCHQ and TLT?

SCHQ and TLT both target long-term US treasuries. While SCHQ's lower expense ratio might appeal to cost-conscious investors, TLT's extensive history and higher asset base provide more stability and liquidity. Each fund's characteristics suit different strategies: TLT for those prioritizing established performance, SCHQ for low fees.

How does liquidity affect ETFs like SCHQ and TLT?

Liquidity, tied to net assets, affects ETF trading. SCHQ has $916 million in assets, whereas TLT's $46.7 billion provides ample trading volume and liquidity. This can lead to more efficient price discovery and less spread between bid and ask prices, important for traders executing large transactions.

Why are the inception dates of SCHQ and TLT significant for investors?

SCHQ launched in 2019, while TLT has been active since 2002. Longer histories, as with TLT, offer more data for analyzing performance through different market conditions. SCHQ's shorter track record might mean less predictable behaviour, as it hasn't been exposed to long-term market cycles.

What role do top holdings play in determining an ETF's performance?

Though the top holdings for both SCHQ and TLT are unavailable, generally, these can heavily influence the fund's return profile. The concentration of top holdings impacts diversification, which is critical in managing portfolio risk and understanding potential returns.

What practical considerations should guide my decision between SCHQ and TLT?

When comparing SCHQ and TLT, consider factors such as expense ratios, net assets, and dividend yields. Evaluate whether the potential higher yield of SCHQ aligns with your income requirements, balancing this against the operational stability and liquidity of TLT. Understanding these features will help make a more informed decision.

What is the best way to analyse SCHQ and TLT's dividend distributions?

Assess dividend distributions through the ETFs' yields and payment schedules. SCHQ and TLT's respective yields of 4.93% and 4.76% can indicate potential income. Examine how these align with the funds' historical payment records, understanding that these are subject to fluctuate based on underlying treasury rates and market conditions.

SCHQ vs TLT

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Schwab Long Term U.S. Treasury ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF. This page reviews fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio versus TLT’s 0.15%. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SCHQ

Metric

TLT

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.15%

4.93%

Dividend Yield

4.76%

$916.04M

Net Assets

$46.71B

102

Holdings

Oct 10, 2019

Inception Date

Jul 22, 2002

–

Index Tracked

–

Long Government

Fund Category

Long Government

SCHQ costs about $12.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SCHQ vs VGLT

Compare SCHQ vs VGLT for long-term U.S. Treasury exposure. We examine their 0.03% fees, dividend yields, asset sizes, and holdings transparency.

SGOV vs TLT

Compare SGOV and TLT, the iShares ultrashort and long-term Treasury Bond ETFs. Review expense ratios, yields, and duration for informed research.

EDV vs TLT

Compare EDV and TLT ETFs. Review expense ratios, dividend yields, and net assets. Note that index details and top holdings are currently not available.

Investment Analysis

SCHQ

Pros

Expense ratio is very low at 0.03%, reducing ongoing investment costs.
Net assets stand at 916 million dollars, supporting moderate fund liquidity.
Dividend yield is 4.93%, offering competitive income distribution.

Considerations

Inception date is October 2019, providing a limited historical tracking record.
Index tracked details are not available, limiting understanding of methodology.
Net assets of 916 million dollars are substantially smaller than major rivals.

TLT

Pros

Net assets exceed 46.7 billion dollars, indicating high liquidity and trading volume.
Inception date is July 2002, providing a long, stable operational history.
Expense ratio of 0.15% remains reasonable for a large government bond fund.

Considerations

Expense ratio is 0.15%, which is higher than some direct competitors.
Dividend yield is 4.76%, slightly lower than certain similar treasury funds.
Index tracked details are not available, preventing full methodology transparency.

About SCHQ and TLT

SCHQ (SCHQ)

This exchange-traded fund (ETF) aims to track the performance of long-term U.S. Treasury securities, offering investors exposure to government-backed bonds with maturities typically exceeding 10 years. Managed by Schwab, this fund stands out for its exceptionally low expense ratio of just 0.03%, making it a cost-efficient choice for those seeking yield. With a net asset value of approximately USD 916 million and a current dividend yield of 4.93%, it provides a stream of income derived from interest payments. Investors should be aware that while Treasury securities are considered safe from default risk, they are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. As such, the value of the fund can rise and fall based on changes in prevailing interest rates and economic conditions. It serves as a potential diversification tool within a broader fixed-income portfolio, offering stability and predictable income streams.

TLT (TLT)

The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) offers investors exposure to U.S. government bonds with maturities of 20 years or longer. As a long-term government bond fund, it is often influenced significantly by interest rate changes and economic outlooks. When interest rates fall, bond prices generally rise, and vice versa. With a modest expense ratio of 0.15% and net assets of USD 46.71 billion, it is a widely traded vehicle for those looking to diversify beyond equities. The fund holds 49 underlying assets and has an inception date of July 2002. It currently provides a dividend yield of approximately 4.76%. Investors should note that the value of this fund can fluctuate due to changes in long-term interest rates and inflation expectations, meaning returns are not guaranteed. It suits those seeking potential income or diversification, though it carries risks related to interest rate sensitivity.

Buy SCHQ or TLT in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

SCHQ vs TLT

Fund Snapshot