What do expense ratios represent and how do they affect ETF returns?

An expense ratio is the annual fee charged by a fund to cover management and operational costs, expressed as a percentage of assets. Both SCHK and SCHX charge 0.03%, meaning investors pay £3 per £10,000 invested annually. Lower expenses allow more of the underlying return to remain with the investor, compounding over time. Even small differences can meaningfully affect net returns across long holding periods, making it important to compare these ratios alongside performance.

Why do both funds lack publicly available index tracking details?

For SCHK and SCHX, the tracked index is listed as not available in the provided data. This means we cannot verify which benchmark each fund uses or how closely it replicates its constituents. Index methodology affects security selection, weighting and rebalancing, all of which influence returns and risk. Beginners should seek official factsheets for transparency and consider how limited disclosure may complicate direct comparisons or due diligence.

How does net asset size relate to liquidity in ETFs?

Net assets reflect the total value of holdings within a fund. SCHX, with $73.9 billion, indicates very high scale and likely tight bid–ask spreads and deep order books, supporting efficient trading. SCHK, at $5.9 billion, is smaller but still substantial; investors should monitor trading volumes and spreads to ensure reliable execution. Larger assets can also support better tracking by easing rebalancing, though they do not guarantee performance.

What investment goals might suit SCHK versus SCHX?

SCHK, positioned as a large-cap growth ETF, is typically associated with investors seeking exposure to companies expected to grow earnings faster than the broader market, often prioritising capital appreciation over income. SCHX, as a US large-cap ETF, generally targets broad exposure to large companies across styles, suiting those wanting diversified core holdings. Goals may include long-term accumulation for SCHK and core portfolio building for SCHX, depending on risk tolerance.

How similar are the top holdings of SCHK and SCHX?

The top ten holdings for both funds are identical: NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU and TSLA. Weightings differ slightly, with SCHK showing NVDA at 7.50% and SCHX at 7.69%, reflecting small variations in index construction or rebalancing. This high overlap suggests comparable concentration in megacap technology leaders, which may lead to correlated performance and similar idiosyncratic risks tied to those constituents.

What do the dividend yields tell me about income from these ETFs?

SCHK lists a dividend yield of 1.00% and SCHX 0.99%, indicating minimal income generation relative to many other equity ETFs. These figures can change with distributions, share prices and holdings, so treat them as a snapshot. Investors seeking higher income may look beyond large-cap growth or broad large-cap style ETFs, while noting that yields alone do not capture total return from capital gains or growth-oriented portfolios.

How might differences in inception dates influence interpretation of performance history?

SCHK began on 11 October 2017, while SCHX launched on 3 November 2009. The longer history of SCHX offers more periods of market cycles for evaluating tracking, volatility and drawdowns, albeit under different economic conditions. SCHK’s shorter record means less data but may better reflect recent market structures. Beginners should consider both timeframes and avoid extrapolating past results without context about fee changes, index revisions and market regimes.

Does sector exposure matter when comparing these ETFs?

Sector weights are not available for either SCHK or SCHX, which limits insights into concentration risks across industries like technology, consumer discretionary or communications. Without this data, investors cannot easily assess diversification or sensitivity to sector-specific shocks. When sector transparency is lacking, reviewing official documents and monitoring changes in top holdings can help approximate sector tilt, especially given the overlap in megacap tech constituents.

How should beginners verify the data used in this comparison?

Use primary sources such as issuer factsheets and index provider documents to confirm expense ratios, holdings, dividend distributions and benchmarks. The Yahoo Finance snapshot provided here notes that index tracked and sector weights are not available; cross-checking across multiple dates helps identify stale or revised figures. Always note the source and retrieval date, since ETF data changes with rebalancing, share price movements and corporate actions affecting dividends.

If both ETFs have similar holdings and fees, why compare them?

Even with matching top holdings and identical 0.03% expense ratios, differences in scale, inception dates, dividend yields (1.00% vs 0.99%) and undisclosed index methodologies can affect tracking error, liquidity, tax treatment of distributions and long-term total return. Comparisons help isolate these nuances, enabling better-fit choices for portfolio construction, risk management and rebalancing strategy rather than assuming near-identical outcomes.

SCHK vs SCHX

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

SCHK vs SCHX: A detailed comparison of Schwab U.S. Large Cap Growth ETF and US Large-Cap ETF Schwab. Examine fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Both charge 0.03% expense ratios, with SCHK at $5.9b and SCHX at $73.9b in net assets. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SCHK

Metric

SCHX

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.00%

Dividend Yield

0.99%

$5.94B

Net Assets

$73.93B

984

Holdings

750

Oct 11, 2017

Inception Date

Nov 3, 2009

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Blend

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	SCHK	SCHX
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	7.50%	7.69%
AAPLApple Inc.	6.99%	7.16%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	5.22%	5.35%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	3.47%	3.56%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	2.88%	2.95%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	2.32%	2.38%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	2.29%	2.35%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	2.12%	2.17%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	1.56%	1.60%
TSLATesla, Inc.	1.46%	1.49%

Discover More Comparisons

SCHG vs SCHX

SCHG vs SCHX compared: large-cap growth at 0.04% or the full large-cap market at 0.03%. See fees, holdings overlap, yields and fund size side by side.

SCHD vs SCHX

SCHD vs SCHX: SCHD yields 3.12% from 102 dividend stocks at 0.06%; SCHX holds 750 large caps yielding 1.00% at 0.03%. Compare fees, holdings and goals.

SCHB vs SCHX

SCHB vs SCHX compared: both charge 0.03% and share the same top ten. See how 2,380 broad-market holdings differ from 750 large caps in yield and size.

Investment Analysis

SCHK

Pros

The fund offers a low expense ratio of 0.03% for accessing large-cap growth equities.
Net assets of $5.9 billion indicate sufficient scale for operational stability and liquidity.
An inception date of October 11, 2017 provides several years of performance history.

Considerations

Dividend yield of 1.00% may appeal less to income-focused investors than alternatives.
The tracked index methodology is listed as not available, limiting transparency on selection.
Specific sector weightings are not available, obscuring precise industry concentration risks.

SCHX

Pros

Massive net assets of $73.9 billion suggest high liquidity and established market presence.
A long history since its November 3, 2009 inception offers extensive track record data.
The 0.03% expense ratio keeps holding costs minimal for broad large-cap exposure.

Considerations

The index tracked is listed as not available, creating uncertainty regarding the benchmark.
Sector weights are not available, making detailed industry exposure analysis difficult for investors.
A similar 0.99% dividend yield may not satisfy those seeking significant income generation.

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SCHK and SCHX

SCHK (SCHK)

The Schwab U.S. Large Cap Growth ETF (SCHK) is a low-cost investment vehicle designed for investors seeking broad exposure to the growth segment of the U.S. large-cap market. By tracking the performance of a major U.S. large-cap growth index, this fund offers diversified access to a substantial number of established companies across various sectors. With an extremely competitive expense ratio of just 0.03%, it helps minimise holding costs, allowing more of your investment potential to work for you over time. The fund holds 984 individual securities, spreading risk across many different businesses rather than concentrating it in a few stocks. While it provides a dividend yield of 1.00%, its primary focus is generally on capital appreciation through participation in the growth of large American companies. As with any equity fund, the value of investments can go down as well as up, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

SCHX (SCHX)

Schwab US Large‑Cap ETF (SCHX) offers broad exposure to the largest US companies through a single, passively managed fund. It aims to replicate the performance of a large‑cap US equity index, providing diversified access to established names across multiple sectors. SCHX is positioned as a low‑cost core equity holding for investors seeking market‑capitalisation‑weighted large‑cap returns, and it trades on exchanges like a stock. Advantages include simplicity, intraday liquidity and typically lower fees than many active managers. However, like all equity ETFs, its value fluctuates with the market and past performance does not predict future results. SCHX may suit investors looking for long‑term US large‑cap exposure within a diversified portfolio, but it is general information only and not personalised investment advice—suitability depends on individual goals, time horizon and risk tolerance.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Following Charles Schwab's massive $20 billion stock buyback and dividend increase, this theme focuses on other financially robust companies that are similarly rewarding their investors. The strategy is to invest in firms with strong cash flows and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Buy SCHK or SCHX in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

SCHK vs SCHX

Fund Snapshot