What is the main difference in investment style between SCHB and SCHV?

SCHB follows a 'Large Blend' approach, meaning it aims to capture the overall performance of the broad US large-cap market by holding a mix of growth and value stocks. In contrast, SCHV focuses specifically on 'Large Value', targeting companies deemed undervalued by market metrics. While both funds provide exposure to US equities, their underlying philosophies differ: one seeks broad market representation, while the other concentrates on a specific factor. This structural difference influences their holdings and performance characteristics across different market environments.

How do expense ratios impact long-term investment returns?

The expense ratio represents the annual fee deducted from the fund’s assets to cover operational costs. For these funds, the difference is minimal: SCHB charges 0.03%, while SCHV charges 0.04%, resulting in a 0.01% spread. While this small percentage seems insignificant, fees compound over time. A lower expense ratio theoretically allows investors to retain slightly more of their returns compared to a higher-cost alternative, assuming all other factors remain equal. This cost efficiency is a key consideration when comparing similar financial products.

What does 'net assets' indicate about an ETF?

Net assets, or assets under management (AUM), reflect the total market value of the investments held by the fund. SCHB has $44.4 billion, while SCHV has $16.9 billion. Larger funds often benefit from greater liquidity, meaning it may be easier to buy or sell shares without significantly impacting the share price. Additionally, higher assets can provide stability and ensure the fund can meet operational demands. Investors frequently consider AUM as a proxy for a fund's popularity and institutional support within the marketplace.

How do the dividend yields differ between these two funds?

Dividend yield indicates the cash income an investor receives relative to the fund's price. SCHV currently offers a higher yield of 1.79% compared to SCHB’s 1.01%. This discrepancy is typical, as value stocks (targeted by SCHV) often pay higher dividends than growth stocks, which tend to reinvest profits for expansion. Income-focused investors might prioritise this yield difference, whereas growth-oriented investors may pay less attention to current distributions. Both figures provide a snapshot of potential income generation under the current market conditions.

What are the top holdings for each fund and why do they matter?

The top holdings reveal the companies with the largest weight in the portfolio. SCHB’s largest position is NVDA at 7.21%, followed by major technology and consumer discretionary firms like AAPL and MSFT. This reflects its broad blend strategy, heavily influenced by market-cap-weighted giants. Conversely, SCHV’s top holding is MU at 3.52%, with significant weights in JPM and BRK.B. This concentration in financials, industrials, and consumer staples illustrates its distinct large-cap value focus, showing a clear divergence from the tech-heavy composition of the broad market fund.

Do SCHB and SCHV hold the same stocks?

Not entirely. While both are US equity funds, they target different segments. SCHB aims for the broad market, while SCHV targets value stocks specifically. Consequently, their portfolios differ significantly. A comparative analysis of their top ten holdings shows only one overlap: MU (Micron Technology). This limited overlap underscores how differently the underlying indices are constructed. Investors should review the specific holdings lists to understand that owning both funds does not provide identical exposure, even though they share some individual constituents.

How does sector concentration differ between these ETFs?

Sector weights for these funds are not available in the current data set. However, examining the top holdings provides insight into their likely sector tilts. SCHB is heavily weighted towards Information Technology and Communication Services due to the presence of NVDA, AAPL, and META. In contrast, SCHV shows strong representation in Financials (JPM), Industrials, and Consumer Staples (JNJ, WMT). This suggests that SCHB is more sensitive to technology sector performance, while SCHV’s performance is driven by a mix of traditional economic sectors, offering distinct diversification characteristics.

What is the significance of the inception dates for these funds?

SCHB was launched on 3 November 2009, and SCHV on 11 December 2009. Both funds share nearly identical inception dates, having been established shortly after the global financial crisis. This provides a comparable track record spanning over a decade. While the specific data on index tracking is not available, the similar age allows investors to assume that both funds have navigated comparable macroeconomic cycles. However, track record length alone does not guarantee future benchmark adherence or performance outcomes.

What is the impact of the 'Large Blend' vs 'Large Value' categories?

Category classification helps investors understand a fund's objective. 'Large Blend' (SCHB) indicates a mix of value and growth styles, generally mirroring the broader market's composition. 'Large Value' (SCHV) targets companies trading at discounts to their fundamental value. Historically, these styles perform differently: value often excels during economic recoveries, while growth may outperform in low-interest-rate environments. Understanding these category distinctions is crucial for portfolio construction, as they define how each fund is expected to behave relative to the wider stock market.

What information is missing that investors should seek?

Notably, the 'Index Tracked' field is 'not available' for both SCHB and SCHV in this dataset. Additionally, specific 'Sector Weights' are also marked as 'not available'. While general sector exposure can be inferred from top holdings, precise sector allocation data is missing. Investors should consult the fund provider’s official documentation to understand exactly which indices these ETFs aim to replicate and to verify the full breakdown of sector and industry exposures beyond just the top ten companies.

How should a beginner interpret the liquidity of SCHB vs SCHV?

Liquidity is often correlated with fund size. SCHB, with $44.4 billion in net assets, is significantly larger than SCHV, which holds $16.9 billion. A larger asset base typically implies tighter bid-ask spreads and higher trading volumes, facilitating easier entry and exit for large transactions. While SCHV still possesses substantial assets ($16.9 billion), which suggests sufficient liquidity for most retail and institutional investors, the sheer scale of SCHB offers a potential advantage in trading efficiency and market depth.

SCHB vs SCHV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

This comparison between U.S Broad Market Schwab (SCHB) and Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) examines fees, holdings and dividends. With expense ratios of 0.03% and 0.04%, each fund targets a distinct segment of the US equity market. The analysis clarifies how their investment strategies differ in practice. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SCHB

Metric

SCHV

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.04%

1.01%

Dividend Yield

1.79%

$44.42B

Net Assets

$16.91B

2,380

Holdings

559

Nov 3, 2009

Inception Date

Dec 11, 2009

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Value

SCHB costs about $1.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	SCHB	SCHV
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	1.50%	3.52%

Discover More Comparisons

SCHB vs SCHD

SCHB vs SCHD compared: 0.03% vs 0.06% expense ratio, total US market vs 100 dividend stocks, 1.01% vs 3.12% yield, overlap and which fits your goal.

SCHB vs VTI

Compare SCHB and VTI on fees, holdings and dividends. Both track broad U.S. markets with 0.03% expense ratios. Analyze net assets and yields.

SCHB vs SCHX

SCHB vs SCHX compared: both charge 0.03% and share the same top ten. See how 2,380 broad-market holdings differ from 750 large caps in yield and size.

Investment Analysis

SCHB

Pros

The fund's expense ratio is 0.03%, which is a very competitive cost for broad market exposure.
With net assets of $44.4 billion, the fund offers substantial liquidity and size stability.
Inception in 2009 provides a lengthy track record for consistent benchmark tracking performance.

Considerations

The dividend yield is 1.01%, which is lower than the 1.79% yield of the value-focused fund.
Top holdings include NVDA at 7.21%, indicating potential concentration in high-growth technology sectors.
The tracked index is not available in the data, which limits transparency on methodology.

SCHV

Pros

The dividend yield is 1.79%, appealing to income-oriented investors seeking higher distributions.
Net assets of $16.9 billion provide sufficient liquidity for institutional and retail transactions.
Inception in 2009 establishes a reliable historical performance record for large-cap value strategies.

Considerations

The expense ratio is 0.04%, which is slightly higher than the 0.03% cost of the broad fund.
Top holdings include MU at 3.52%, showing concentration in specific value and industrial sectors.
The tracked index is not available in the data, reducing clarity on the index construction.

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SCHB and SCHV

SCHB (SCHB)

SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) offers investors broad exposure to the US equity market by tracking a wide-capitalisation index of US-listed companies. It is structured as an exchange-traded fund from Charles Schwab and aims to capture the performance of the overall US stock market rather than just large-cap names. Investors should know it provides diversified single-ticket access to many sectors, can be used as a core equity holding, and typically has the trading flexibility of an ETF. As with all equity investments, values can rise and fall and past performance is no guarantee of future returns. This information is educational and not personal investment advice; check the fund’s prospectus and current factsheets for up-to-date details on holdings, fees, distributions and risks before making decisions.

SCHV (SCHV)

SCHV (Schwab US Large‑Cap Value ETF) is an exchange‑traded fund that seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large‑Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, providing diversified exposure to large‑capitalisation U.S. companies classified as value stocks. Managed by Charles Schwab, the ETF is designed for passive, cost‑efficient investing and typically offers regular income through dividends. It can serve as a way to tilt a portfolio toward value characteristics—such as lower valuation multiples or higher dividend yields—rather than growth. Investors should note that ETFs are pooled instruments (so a single market‑cap figure for the ETF itself is not applicable in the same way as for a company), and performance depends on the underlying index and market conditions. Value styles can underperform growth for extended periods and returns are not guaranteed. This summary is educational only and not personalised financial advice; suitability depends on individual objectives and risk tolerance.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Following Charles Schwab's massive $20 billion stock buyback and dividend increase, this theme focuses on other financially robust companies that are similarly rewarding their investors. The strategy is to invest in firms with strong cash flows and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Buy SCHB or SCHV in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

SCHB vs SCHV

Fund Snapshot