What is the primary structural difference between RSPT and VGT?

RSPT employs an equal-weighted strategy, giving each constituent a similar allocation regardless of company size. In contrast, VGT follows a capitalisation-weighted approach, where larger companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft dominate the portfolio. This fundamental distinction means RSPT offers broader exposure to mid-cap technology firms, while VGT heavily relies on the performance of mega-cap industry leaders.

How do the expense ratios of these two funds compare?

RSPT charges an annual expense ratio of 0.40%, whereas VGT has a significantly lower cost of 0.09%. This 0.31 percentage-point difference can compound over time, potentially impacting long-term returns. VGT benefits from Vanguard's reputation for low-cost investing, while RSPT's higher fee reflects the costs associated with rebalancing its equal-weighted methodology to maintain consistent exposure across its holdings.

What are the current net assets and inception dates for each fund?

VGT is substantially larger, with net assets of $150.2 billion and an inception date of 26 January 2004. RSPT has net assets of $6.3 billion, launched on 1 November 2006. While RSPT has a long operational history, VGT's massive scale generally supports tighter trading spreads and high liquidity. Both funds have sufficient assets for most retail investors.

How do the top holdings differ between the two funds?

VGT is highly concentrated, with its top three holdings (NVDA, AAPL, MSFT) accounting for over 45% of assets. RSPT avoids this concentration by capping individual weights; its top holding, ZBRA, represents just 2.06%. Only Palantir (PLTR) appears in the top-10 lists of both funds. RSPT's equal weighting reduces reliance on mega-cap dominance.

Which fund might be better suited for income-focused investors?

VGT offers a dividend yield of 0.34%, while RSPT yields 0.23%. Both yields are relatively low, as technology companies typically prioritise growth and share buybacks over dividend distribution. VGT provides slightly better income potential, but neither fund is designed primarily for generating regular cash flows. Investors seeking high yields should look beyond technology sector ETFs to more dividend-oriented asset classes.

Does the tracking method differ for these ETFs?

The specific index tracked and methodology details are currently listed as not available for both RSPT and VGT in the provided data. However, RSPT follows an equal-weighted approach, while VGT follows a market-capitalisation weighting strategy. The lack of transparency in tracking methodology limits precise assessment, though the structural differences in weighting are clear based on their distinct top holding distributions and portfolio construction methods.

What type of technology exposure does each fund provide?

RSPT provides diversified exposure to S&P 500 technology companies without letting mega-caps dominate, including mid-caps like Zebra Technologies and Dell. VGT offers concentrated exposure to technology giants, heavily weighted towards semiconductor and software leaders. Investors choosing RSPT seek to mitigate single-stock risk, while those selecting VGT accept higher concentration in exchange for potential mega-cap growth participation.

How significant is the concentration risk in each fund?

VGT carries extreme concentration risk, with its top three holdings comprising over 45% of total assets. If one of these mega-caps underperforms, the fund's overall return suffers significantly. RSPT mitigates this by equal-weighting its holdings, capping the top position at 2.06%. This structure offers a more balanced portfolio but may underperform during periods when mega-caps outpace the broader technology sector.

What factors should beginners consider when comparing fees?

Beginners should note the 0.31 percentage-point annual cost difference between RSPT (0.40%) and VGT (0.09%). Over decades, this fee gap can meaningfully reduce compounding returns in RSPT. However, investors must also consider the potential upside of equal weighting versus the cost efficiency of capitalisation weighting. Lower fees are generally advantageous, but the strategy's objective and portfolio structure should also influence the decision.

How does fund size impact trading and liquidity?

VGT's $150.2 billion in net assets ensures high liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads due to its scale. RSPT, at $6.3 billion, remains adequately liquid for most investors but may experience slightly wider spreads during volatile market conditions. Larger asset bases generally facilitate easier entry and exit. Both funds are well-capitalised, though VGT's size provides marginal practical advantages in trading efficiency.

RSPT vs VGT

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare RSPT and VGT. This page details fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. Invesco's equal-weight approach contrasts with Vanguard's capitalisation. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

RSPT

Metric

VGT

0.40%

Expense Ratio

0.09%

0.23%

Dividend Yield

0.34%

$6.28B

Net Assets

$150.23B

Holdings

323

Nov 1, 2006

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

VGT costs about $31.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	RSPT	VGT
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.	1.76%	1.61%

Discover More Comparisons

RSPT vs XLK

Compare RSPT and XLK technology ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, and holdings to understand key differences between these funds.

RSPT vs SPMO

Compare RSPT and SPMO ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking methods for Invesco's technology equal weight and momentum funds.

RSPT vs SCHG

Compare RSPT and SCHG ETFs. Review 0.40% and 0.04% expense ratios, 0.23% and 0.36% yields, sector exposure, top holdings and index tracking details.

Investment Analysis

RSPT

Pros

Equal weighting reduces reliance on mega-cap dominance, offering broader exposure to mid-cap technology firms.
The fund maintains a substantial net asset value of $6.3 billion, ensuring adequate liquidity for most investors.
An inception date of November 2006 provides a long operational history, aiding in tracking performance assessment.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.40% is significantly higher than many core technology sector alternatives available in the market.
Dividend yield stands at just 0.23%, reflecting minimal income generation for investors seeking regular cash flows.
Limited transparency exists as the index tracked and sector weights are currently listed as not available in data.

VGT

Pros

Vanguard’s issuer reputation for low costs is reflected in a competitive expense ratio of only 0.09% annually.
With $150.2 billion in net assets, the fund enjoys massive scale, supporting tight trading spreads and liquidity.
A high dividend yield of 0.34% provides slightly better income potential compared to the equal-weighted peer.

Considerations

Extreme concentration risk is evident, with the top three holdings accounting for over 45% of total assets.
The fund has an inception date of January 2004, meaning shorter history for newer market conditions analysis.
Tracking method details are missing as the index tracked is not available, limiting precise methodology review.

About RSPT and VGT

RSPT (RSPT)

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide investors with broad exposure to the technology sector within the S&P 500. Unlike traditional index funds that weight companies by market capitalisation—often concentrating holdings in a few mega-cap firms—RSPT assigns an equal weight to each underlying holding. This approach ensures that mid-cap and large-cap technology companies all have the same influence on the fund's performance, potentially offering a more diversified view of the sector. Launched in November 2006, the fund currently holds 77 companies with net assets of approximately USD 6.28 billion. It features an expense ratio of 0.40% and a dividend yield of 0.23%. As with all technology-focused investments, RSPT can be subject to significant volatility, and values may rise or fall, so it is important for investors to understand the inherent risks.

VGT (VGT)

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) aims to provide investors with exposure to companies operating in the technology sector, encompassing both US and international firms. As a broad market fund, it seeks to track the performance of the technology industry by holding a diversified basket of over 300 stocks. With a low expense ratio of 0.09%, it offers a cost-efficient way to gain access to major tech players. Investors should note that while the fund offers potential growth tied to technological innovation, it is heavily concentrated in the technology sector. This concentration means its value can fluctuate significantly based on sector-specific trends, regulatory changes, and market sentiment. Returns are not guaranteed, and values can rise and fall, making it suitable for those who understand the risks associated with sector-focused investing.

Buy RSPT or VGT in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

RSPT vs VGT

Fund Snapshot