What do the covered call strategies in QYLD and RYLD actually mean for returns?

Both funds utilise a covered call strategy, meaning they sell call options against their underlying holdings. This generates premium income, which is distributed to shareholders. However, selling calls can cap the fund's upside potential in strong bull markets. If the underlying index rises significantly, gains above the strike price of the sold options are typically forfeited. Consequently, these funds often exhibit lower participation in rapid market rallies compared to non-covered call ETFs, prioritising current income over maximum capital appreciation.

How do the expense ratios of QYLD and RYLD compare, and does it matter?

Both QYLD and RYLD have an identical expense ratio of 0.60%. Since the fees are equal, they do not differ in cost efficiency. Over time, this fee represents a consistent drag on net returns for both funds. Investors should note that while the percentage is the same, the absolute dollar cost varies based on the investment amount. When comparing funds with similar fees, other factors like yield stability and market exposure become more critical in decision-making processes rather than cost alone.

Are the top holdings of QYLD and RYLD similar, and what does that imply?

The top holdings of QYLD and RYLD show no overlap in the listed data. QYLD is heavily weighted towards large-cap technology companies like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT. In contrast, RYLD’s top holding is RSSL, reflecting its focus on the Russell 2000 small-cap index. This divergence implies that the two funds offer entirely different market exposures. An investor holding both would have diversified across large-cap growth and small-cap value segments, rather than concentrating risk in similar stocks.

Which investing goals are typically associated with QYLD versus RYLD?

QYLD is often associated with investors seeking income while maintaining exposure to the Nasdaq 100’s growth-oriented large-cap technology sector. It appeals to those wanting dividends from tech-heavy stocks. RYLD targets investors seeking income with broad exposure to US small-cap companies via the Russell 2000. It is typically chosen by those who believe small-caps offer distinct opportunities or diversification benefits not found in large-caps. Both funds generally align with income-focused goals rather than pure capital appreciation strategies, though the underlying market segments differ significantly.

How does the size and history of QYLD and RYLD differ?

QYLD has a longer operating history, having launched in December 2013, and manages net assets of $8.5 billion. This provides a longer track record through various market cycles. RYLD, launched in April 2019, has net assets of $1.4 billion. The shorter history of RYLD means less data is available regarding its long-term performance across different economic environments. Investors might perceive QYLD as having more proven operational history, while RYLD offers a more recent strategy implementation for small-cap exposure.

What are the dividend yields for QYLD and RYLD, and are they guaranteed?

As of the provided data, QYLD has a dividend yield of 11.50%, while RYLD offers 11.94%. These high yields are primarily driven by the premium income from the covered call strategies. However, dividends for ETFs are not guaranteed; they fluctuate based on market conditions, option prices, and the performance of the underlying holdings. A high yield does not ensure a safe or increasing payout. Changes in volatility or index performance can affect the premiums collected, thereby influencing distribution amounts.

How should investors interpret the concentration risk in QYLD’s top holdings?

QYLD’s top holding, NVDA, represents 8.54% of the portfolio. This level of concentration means that the fund’s performance is significantly influenced by the movement of this single stock. If NVDA underperforms or faces sector-specific headwinds, it could disproportionately affect the fund’s net asset value and potentially the options premiums. While the Nasdaq 100 is diversified across tech leaders, a near 10% weight in one name introduces idiosyncratic risk that investors should monitor alongside broader market trends.

What does the 'not available' sector weight mean for these comparisons?

For both QYLD and RYLD, sector weights are listed as 'not available' in the provided data. This means a precise breakdown of how each fund is distributed across industries like technology, healthcare, or financials cannot be directly verified from this source alone. Investors seeking detailed sector diversification analysis must rely on other data sources or general knowledge of the underlying indices (Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000). It highlights the importance of verifying data completeness when performing deep fundamental comparisons.

What is the primary difference in market capitalisation focus between the two funds?

The fundamental difference lies in market capitalisation. QYLD tracks the Nasdaq 100, which consists predominantly of large-cap, often mega-cap, technology and growth-oriented companies. RYLD tracks the Russell 2000, which is an index of small-cap US companies. Small-caps typically have higher volatility and less analyst coverage than large-caps. This distinction means the two funds respond differently to economic shifts. Large-caps like those in QYLD may be more resilient in downturns, while small-caps in RYLD might offer higher growth potential during economic expansions, albeit with greater risk.

How do the inception dates affect the reliability of performance data?

QYLD, founded in 2013, has over a decade of history, allowing for analysis through multiple market cycles, including bull and bear markets. RYLD, founded in 2019, has a shorter track record. This limits the ability to assess how the covered call strategy performs in specific, less common economic conditions, such as prolonged high-interest-rate environments or unique volatility spikes. Investors often weigh the stability of a longer track record against the relevance of a strategy suited to current small-cap conditions when evaluating reliability.

Is the expense ratio high for these types of ETFs?

The 0.60% expense ratio for both QYLD and RYLD is considered relatively high compared to standard passive index ETFs, which often charge below 0.10%. However, for active or derivative-income ETFs, this fee reflects the cost of executing the covered call strategy. While higher fees reduce net returns, the trade-off is the potential for higher immediate income distributions. Investors should compare this cost against the expected yield and strategy complexity, recognising that the fee compensates for the active management involved in option selling.

What should beginners know about reading ETF yield versus actual income?

Beginners must distinguish between quoted yield and actual tax implications or return of capital. The 11.50% and 11.94% yields are forward-looking or trailing indicators and do not guarantee future payments. Covered call ETFs sometimes return capital, which reduces the cost basis but may not be taxable immediately as dividend income. Understanding the composition of distributions is crucial. Yield is a starting point for analysis, but reviewing historical distribution stability and the tax treatment of those distributions provides a more complete picture of the true income experience.

QYLD vs RYLD

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF). Both track market benchmarks with derivative income strategies, featuring a 0.60% expense ratio. Assess their net assets, dividend yields, top holdings, and market focus. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

QYLD

Metric

RYLD

0.60%

Expense Ratio

0.60%

11.50%

Dividend Yield

11.94%

$8.48B

Net Assets

$1.35B

104

Holdings

Dec 12, 2013

Inception Date

Apr 17, 2019

–

Index Tracked

–

Derivative Income

Fund Category

Derivative Income

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

QYLD vs SCHD

Compare QYLD and SCHD ETFs: analyse 0.60% vs 0.06% fees, 11.50% vs 3.11% yields, tech vs value holdings, and tracking methods for informed research.

QYLD vs XYLD

Compare QYLD and XYLD, both 0.60% fee. Analyze 11.50% vs 10.38% yields and holdings like NVDA to decide which covered call fund suits your strategy.

QYLD vs SPYI

Compare QYLD and SPYI on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. See how these derivative income ETFs align with your income and market exposure goals.

Investment Analysis

QYLD

Pros

Invests in the Nasdaq 100, which has historically provided strong growth opportunities and diversification across technology sectors.
The fund distributes a high dividend yield of 11.50 percent, making it attractive for income seeking investors.
As a well-established fund with over 12 years since its inception in 2013, it has a track record of operating through multiple market cycles.

Considerations

The fund's expense ratio is relatively high at 0.60 percent, which can impact long-term net returns.
Its top holding, NVDA, represents 8.54 percent of the portfolio, creating a concentration risk in a single stock.
The fund may cap potential upside due to its covered call strategy, which might limit gains in strong bull markets.

RYLD

Pros

Invests in the Russell 2000 index, which provides broad exposure to small-cap stocks and sector diversification within the United States.
The fund offers a high dividend yield of 11.94 percent, which is appealing for income generation.
The covered call strategy can generate income through the sale of call options, providing a consistent distribution stream.

Considerations

The fund's expense ratio is 0.60 percent, which could erode net returns for investors over time.
It has a top holding of RSSL at 102.02 percent, which indicates that this fund primarily tracks a specific index, potentially limiting diversification within the fund itself.
The fund has a shorter operating history since its inception in 2019, offering less data on long-term performance across various economic conditions.

About QYLD and RYLD

QYLD (QYLD)

The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is a derivative income fund designed to generate regular distributions for investors. Rather than simply tracking the price of the Nasdaq 100, it employs a covered call strategy, holding the underlying index components while selling monthly call options against them. This approach aims to capture premium income, which is reflected in its current dividend yield of 11.50%. The fund holds 104 holdings and carries an expense ratio of 0.60%. While the strategy can provide attractive income, it may limit capital appreciation potential during strong market rallies, as gains are often capped by the sold options. Investors should note that values can fall as well as rise, and income distributions are not guaranteed.

RYLD (RYLD)

The Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF is designed to provide current income while allowing investors to participate in some of the upside potential of small-cap US stocks. It follows a strategy known as covered call writing, where the fund writes call options on a basket of small-cap stocks. This process generates option premium income, which can help enhance the fund's dividend yield, currently standing at 11.94%. However, a key consideration for investors is the trade-off: while the strategy can offer higher income, it may limit capital appreciation if the underlying market rises significantly. With an expense ratio of 0.60% and net assets of USD 1.35 billion, the fund holds 11 positions, offering targeted exposure to the small-cap sector. It is worth noting that this fund's distribution yield is generally not guaranteed, and its value can fall as well as rise.

Buy QYLD or RYLD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

QYLD vs RYLD

Fund Snapshot