What is an expense ratio and how does it impact my investment?

The expense ratio is the annual fee that funds charge for management, expressed as a percentage of your assets. For example, QQQM has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while VOOG charges 0.07%. A lower expense ratio means less money is taken from your investment each year, potentially enhancing your net returns over time. While the difference seems small, over many years, it can significantly affect the growth of your capital due to compounding. Always consider these fees when evaluating long-term investment costs.

What does 'net assets' mean for an ETF like QQQM or VOOG?

Net assets, or Assets Under Management (AUM), represent the total market value of the holdings in an ETF, minus any liabilities. QQQM currently has $105.7 billion in net assets, whereas VOOG has $27.3 billion. Larger net assets often indicate higher liquidity, which means it might be easier to buy or sell shares without significantly affecting the price. However, a larger fund does not automatically mean better performance; it simply reflects the fund's size and popularity among investors. Both funds are substantial, providing ample liquidity for most trading needs.

How do index-tracking ETFs like QQQM and VOOG operate?

ETFs like QQQM and VOOG are designed to track specific market indices, aiming to replicate their performance. QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. In contrast, VOOG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index, targeting large-cap US equities within the S&P 500 that exhibit growth characteristics. Both funds are passively managed, meaning they don't rely on a fund manager's discretion but rather follow the composition of their respective indices, providing diversified exposure to the growth sectors of the stock market.

What are the top holdings in QQQM and VOOG, and how do they differ?

Both QQQM and VOOG hold several large-cap technology and growth companies as their top positions. QQQM's top holdings include NVDA (8.46%), AAPL (7.89%), and MSFT (5.89%). In comparison, VOOG has an even higher concentration in NVDA, accounting for 14.85% of its assets, along with MSFT at 10.46%. While there is significant overlap, VOOG is more concentrated in its top holdings, particularly NVDA and MSFT, whereas QQQM offers a broader spread across the Nasdaq-100, including other notable names like MU and AMZN.

How do the dividend yields of QQQM and VOOG compare?

Both QQQM and VOOG offer a dividend yield of 0.43%. These yields are relatively low, reflecting the funds' focus on growth stocks that often reinvest their earnings into expansion rather than distributing them to shareholders. ETFs with low dividend yields may appeal to investors seeking capital appreciation over income generation. The distributions from these ETFs are generally modest and serve as a supplementary income stream rather than a primary one. Investors prioritising high income should consider funds specifically focused on dividends.

What are the key differences in the investment strategy of QQQM and VOOG?

QQQM aims to provide exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, offering diversified large-cap growth stocks primarily focused on technology and other non-financial sectors. On the other hand, VOOG targets the S&P 500 Growth Index, providing exposure to companies within the broader US market that have growth characteristics, including sectors outside technology. This means that while QQQM provides a concentrated view on tech-heavy growth companies, VOOG presents a more balanced approach to growth stocks across various sectors.

Which types of investing goals are best suited for QQQM or VOOG?

QQQM and VOOG are both suitable for investors seeking long-term capital appreciation from large-cap growth stocks, especially in the technology sector. QQQM may appeal to those who want broader exposure to innovative companies across the Nasdaq-100, including tech, media, and consumer services. VOOG is more fitting for investors comfortable with a slightly more concentrated portfolio of growth stocks within the S&P 500 framework.

What is concentration risk, and how does it affect QQQM and VOOG?

Concentration risk occurs when a large portion of an ETF's assets is invested in a small number of companies. For instance, in VOOG, NVDA makes up 14.85% of total assets, while in QQQM, it accounts for 8.46%. High concentration means the fund's performance is heavily influenced by the movements of these top holdings. If these companies underperform, the entire ETF may suffer. While both funds carry some concentration risk, VOOG's higher weighting in fewer stocks makes it particularly sensitive to their performance relative to QQQM.

How does inception date impact the evaluation of ETFs like QQQM and VOOG?

The inception date indicates when the ETF began trading and thus determines the available track record for investors. QQQM, launched on October 13, 2020, has a shorter operational history compared to VOOG, which started on September 7, 2010. While a longer track record provides more data for analysing historical performance and risk metrics, a newer fund may still align well with an investor's goals. Shorter history means less performance data, so it is crucial to consider the underlying index and its performance instead.

Are there risks associated with growth stocks in ETFs like QQQM and VOOG?

Yes, growth stocks, which are the focus of QQQM and VOOG, often come with higher volatility. These companies may have higher price-to-earnings ratios and reinvest earnings for future expansion, leading to potential significant losses during economic downturns. Growth stocks can also be sensitive to changes in investor sentiment and macroeconomic conditions. Both ETFs carry these risks, but given their respective index focus, the concentration in sectors like technology in QQQM may lead to higher volatility.

Why is liquidity important for ETFs such as QQQM and VOOG?

Liquidity determines how easily you can buy or sell an ETF without affecting its market price. QQQM, with $105.7 billion in assets, typically offers high liquidity, which translates to tighter trading spreads and efficient transaction execution. VOOG, while smaller with $27.3 billion in assets, is still sufficiently liquid for most individual investors. Higher liquidity minimises the cost of trading and reduces the risk of significant price deviations during large transactions.

What should I know about the trading spreads in ETFs like QQQM and VOOG?

The trading spread is the difference between an ETF's bid and ask prices. In highly liquid ETFs like QQQM and VOOG, spreads tend to be narrow, indicating lower trading costs and ease of entering or exiting positions. QQQM, with its larger net assets of $105.7 billion, benefits from this high liquidity, providing tighter spreads. Although smaller, VOOG's $27.3 billion in assets also supports efficient trading, though potentially with slightly wider spreads than larger funds.

QQQM vs VOOG

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

This page compares QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF). It examines expense ratios (0.15% and 0.07%), net assets ($105.7bn and $27.3bn), dividend yields (both 0.43%), top holdings and index focus, explaining how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

QQQM

Metric

VOOG

0.15%

Expense Ratio

0.07%

0.43%

Dividend Yield

0.43%

$105.70B

Net Assets

$27.25B

106

Holdings

154

Oct 13, 2020

Inception Date

Sep 7, 2010

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Growth

Fund Category

Large Growth

VOOG costs about $8.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	QQQM	VOOG
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	8.46%	14.85%
AAPLApple Inc.	7.89%	6.46%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	5.89%	10.46%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	4.85%	3.00%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	4.31%	3.74%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	3.22%	5.52%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	3.22%	3.49%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	2.99%	4.40%

Discover More Comparisons

QQQM vs SPYG

Compare QQQM and SPYG. Review 0.15% vs 0.04% expense ratios, holdings, dividends and tracking methods to understand differences between these large growth ETFs.

QQQM vs SPYM

Compare QQQM and SPYM on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. QQQM: 0.15% fee, 0.43% yield. SPYM: 0.02% fee, 1.00% yield. Shared tech exposure noted.

QQQM vs SPMO

Compare QQQM and SPMO ETFs. Analyse fees, dividend yields, top holdings and index tracking details. Neutral factual data to support research.

Investment Analysis

QQQM

Pros

QQQM charges a low 0.15% expense ratio while holding $105.7 billion in net assets
The fund replicates the Nasdaq-100 index, offering broad growth exposure across large-cap US equities
Its high liquidity and tight trading spreads are supported by substantial assets under management

Considerations

Concentration risk is notable, with top holdings like NVDA and AAPL exceeding 8% each
Dividend yield of 0.43% is minimal, appealing more to growth than income investors
Inception date of October 13, 2020, provides limited track record for long-term evaluation

VOOG

Pros

VOOG benefits from a significantly lower 0.07% expense ratio, enhancing net returns over time
Vanguard's strong reputation for low-cost passive management supports investor confidence
The fund tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index, capturing large-cap growth companies

Considerations

Top holding NVDA represents 14.85% of assets, increasing concentration in one stock
With $27.3 billion in net assets, it is smaller than QQQM, potentially affecting trading depth
Dividend yield of 0.43% offers limited income for investors seeking cash flow

About QQQM and VOOG

QQQM (QQQM)

The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) aims to track the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index, offering investors exposure to a concentrated basket of large-cap growth companies. As a cost-effective version of the well-known Nasdaq exposure, it typically features lower fees than its larger sibling, making it an attractive option for buy-and-hold strategies. The fund holds approximately 106 companies, heavily weighted towards the technology sector, but also including consumer services, health care, and industrials. With net assets exceeding $105 billion, it provides deep liquidity. While historically associated with strong growth during bullish market periods, investors should remember that the underlying companies are subject to market volatility. Values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed. It suits those seeking broad exposure to major US tech and growth innovators, rather than personalised financial advice.

VOOG (VOOG)

The Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF aims to track the performance of large-cap growth stocks listed on the S&P 500 Index. With a low expense ratio of 0.07% and a history dating back to 2010, it offers a cost-effective way for investors to gain exposure to companies expected to grow faster than the average market. This fund holds around 154 stocks, focusing on businesses with strong earnings growth and sales trends. While it provides diversification within the growth sector of the large-cap market, investors should remember that growth stocks can be more volatile than value stocks, and past performance does not guarantee future results. As with any investment, consider your risk tolerance and overall financial strategy.

Buy QQQM or VOOG in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

QQQM vs VOOG

Fund Snapshot