What is the primary structural difference between QDTE and QQQI?

While both QDTE and QQQI are classified as Derivative Income ETFs tracking the Nasdaq-100, their strategies differ. QDTE explicitly focuses on 0DTE (zero days to expiry) covered calls. QQQI uses a high-income approach. Investors should note these distinct methodologies affect risk profiles and yield generation. QDTE’s name suggests a short-dated option strategy, whereas QQQI aims for regular distributions through its own derivative structure. Understanding these specific mechanics is crucial for interpreting their performance and fee structures accurately.

How do expense ratios impact long-term returns for these funds?

Expense ratios represent annual management costs. QDTE has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while QQQI is lower at 0.68%. This 0.28 percentage point difference means QQQI retains more of its gross returns for investors annually. Over time, compounding effects make even small fee differences significant. Higher fees, like QDTE's, require stronger performance to net the same return as a lower-fee fund. Investors should weigh these ongoing costs against potential yield advantages when comparing total expense impacts.

What does 'Derivative Income' mean in this context?

Both QDTE and QQQI are categorized as Derivative Income ETFs. This means they use financial derivatives, typically options, to generate cash flow. Instead of relying solely on underlying stock dividends or price appreciation, these funds sell call options to collect premiums. This strategy aims to produce regular distributions for shareholders. However, it often caps upside potential during strong market rallies. Understanding this mechanism helps explain why yields like QDTE's 43.71% or QQQI's 13.72% can exceed standard equity dividends.

Which fund has the higher dividend yield according to the data?

Based on the provided data, QDTE displays a significantly higher dividend yield of 43.71%, compared to QQQI's 13.72%. Investors often focus on yield when selecting income ETFs. However, high yields can come with trade-offs, such as limited capital appreciation or higher volatility inherent in the specific option-selling strategy employed by QDTE. QQQI offers a more moderate yield profile. Yield alone does not determine total return; investors must consider the sustainability of these distributions and the underlying strategy risks.

How do the top holdings of QDTE and QQQI compare?

The top holdings differ markedly. QDTE lists 'WEEK' at 4.96%, suggesting a specific instrument or ETF component. QQQI lists major tech stocks like NVDA (8.43%) and AAPL (7.77%). This indicates QQQI holds actual equities directly, while QDTE's structure may differ or use specific vehicles. The lack of shared top-10 holdings highlights distinct portfolio constructions. Investors seeking direct exposure to large-cap tech might find QQQI's composition more transparent in terms of equity ownership compared to QDTE's single listed holding.

Is concentration risk relevant for QQQI based on its holdings?

QQQI’s largest holding, NVDA, represents 8.43% of the fund, followed by AAPL at 7.77%. This indicates a degree of concentration in top technology constituents. While typical for Nasdaq-100 funds, this concentration means QQQI's performance is heavily influenced by a few large-cap stocks. If these specific sectors underperform, the fund may feel the impact disproportionately. QDTE's top holding is only 4.96%, suggesting a potentially different or more diversified structural approach, though data limits deeper comparison.

What are the inception dates and track record lengths for these funds?

Both funds have very short operational histories. QQQI launched on January 30, 2024, and QDTE on March 7, 2024. This means neither has a long-term performance record for comparison. Investors lack historical data on how these funds behave during various market cycles, such as significant downturns or sustained bull runs. The limited track record makes it difficult to assess the consistency of their distribution policies or the effectiveness of their option strategies over the long term.

How do the net assets of QDTE and QQQI differ?

There is a vast disparity in size. QQQI has net assets of $14.8 billion, indicating high liquidity and widespread adoption. QDTE has $967 million. Larger asset bases, like QQQI's, often benefit from tighter bid-ask spreads and easier trade execution. Smaller funds like QDTE may face slightly higher transaction costs or liquidity risks during volatile markets. However, QDTE's scale is still substantial enough for operational stability, but it lacks the massive institutional footprint of QQQI.

Are there sector weights available for these funds?

According to the ground truth data, sector weights are 'not available' for both QDTE and QQQI. This lack of transparency prevents investors from analyzing the exact industry composition, such as technology or healthcare exposure. While both track the Nasdaq-100, the specific sector allocation could vary due to the derivative overlay. Without sector weights, investors must rely on the limited top holdings data and general knowledge of the Nasdaq-100 index to infer potential sector exposures.

What does 'Index Tracked: not available' imply for investors?

Both QDTE and QQQI list 'Index Tracked: not available' in the data. This suggests that the funds may not strictly replicate a specific named index or use a proprietary basket of derivatives. Investors cannot assume direct correlation to a standard benchmark like the QQQ index. This opacity requires caution; understanding how the fund is managed and how returns are generated is critical since there is no standard index to serve as a clear performance baseline or structural guide.

Should investors consider QDTE or QQQI as a direct index replacement?

Neither fund should be viewed as a direct replacement for a standard Nasdaq-100 ETF. Their derivative income strategies cap upside potential in exchange for higher yields. QDTE’s focus on 0DTE options introduces specific short-dated risks, while QQQI’s high income strategy may involve different option overlays. Investors seeking pure capital appreciation typically prefer standard index funds. These ETFs are better suited for income-focused strategies, accepting limited growth to receive substantial cash distributions like QDTE’s 43.71% yield.

How does the liquidity of QQQI compare to QDTE?

QQQI, with $14.8 billion in net assets, likely offers superior liquidity compared to QDTE’s $967 million. Larger funds typically have higher trading volumes, resulting in narrower bid-ask spreads and lower slippage during entry or exit. QDTE, while smaller, still represents a significant asset base. However, in periods of market stress, liquidity in smaller ETFs can dry up more quickly. Investors prioritizing ease of trading and lower transaction costs might find QQQI’s scale advantageous.

QDTE vs QQQI

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare QDTE (Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF) and QQQI (NEOS NASDAQ 100 High Income ETF). This page examines expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings, and how each fund tracks the market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

QDTE

Metric

QQQI

0.96%

Expense Ratio

0.68%

43.71%

Dividend Yield

13.72%

$967.30M

Net Assets

$14.80B

Holdings

107

Mar 7, 2024

Inception Date

Jan 30, 2024

–

Index Tracked

–

Derivative Income

Fund Category

Derivative Income

QQQI costs about $28.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

QDTE vs QQQ

Compare QDTE and QQQ on fees, dividends and holdings. QDTE offers high income while QQQ provides low-cost growth exposure. Review data for research.

QDTE vs XDTE

Compare QDTE and XDTE ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Data includes expense ratios of 0.96% and 0.97%, yields of 43.71% and 30.32%.

IQQQ vs QQQI

Compare IQQQ and QQQI Nasdaq-100 income ETFs. Review fees, dividend yields, net assets, top holdings, and tracking methods to assess their structures.

Investment Analysis

QDTE

Pros

The fund generates a dividend yield of 43.71 per cent, offering substantial cash income potential to investors.
Net assets stand at 967 million dollars, indicating significant investor adoption and sufficient scale for operational stability.
As a Roundhill product, it operates within a specialist derivative income category, providing a specific and targeted exposure mechanism.

Considerations

The expense ratio is 0.96 per cent, which represents a higher cost burden compared to many standard equity ETFs.
A single top holding accounts for 4.96 per cent of the fund, suggesting a concentrated structure that may increase specific risk.
The fund has a short operational history since inception in March 2024, limiting the available long-term performance data.

QQQI

Pros

The expense ratio is 0.68 per cent, providing a comparatively lower cost structure than many actively managed income ETFs.
Net assets of 14.8 billion dollars indicate high liquidity and strong investor confidence in the fund's stability and size.
It offers a dividend yield of 13.72 per cent, which may appeal to investors seeking regular income distributions.

Considerations

The largest holding represents 8.43 per cent of the fund, indicating a degree of concentration in top constituent positions.
The fund has a limited track record since its inception in January 2024, offering little historical data for performance assessment.
The index tracked is not available, which creates opacity regarding the specific benchmark or methodology guiding portfolio construction.

About QDTE and QQQI

QDTE (QDTE)

The Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF (QDTE) is an exchange-traded fund designed to generate income through options strategies linked to the Nasdaq-100 index. By focusing on zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) covered calls, the fund aims to capture premium from short-term volatility while maintaining exposure to large-cap technology companies. With a net asset value of approximately USD 967 million and an inception date of March 7, 2024, QDTE is a relatively new addition to the derivative income category. It holds five primary positions, reflecting its concentrated strategy. Investors should note the expense ratio of 0.96% and be aware that while the dividend yield is high, it comes with specific risks associated with options trading and market volatility. As with all investments, capital is at risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

QQQI (QQQI)

The NEOS NASDAQ 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is a derivative income fund designed to offer investors exposure to the technology-heavy NASDAQ 100 index while generating substantial current income. Launched in January 2024, this ETF holds a diversified portfolio of 107 assets, primarily focusing on large-cap technology and growth companies. Its distinguishing feature is the systematic writing of covered call options on the underlying index, a strategy intended to harvest premium income that is distributed to shareholders. With a reported dividend yield of approximately 13.72%, it appeals to those seeking regular cash flow alongside potential capital appreciation. However, investors should note that the covered call strategy may limit upside potential during strong market rallies. The fund has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which is moderate for a derivative-based product. As with all investments, capital is at risk, and values can fluctuate due to market conditions.

Buy QDTE or QQQI in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

QDTE vs QQQI

Fund Snapshot