What does expense ratio mean for ETFs like QDPL and SPYI?

The expense ratio is the annual fee deducted from a fund's assets to cover management costs. For Fund A (QDPL), the expense ratio is 0.60%, while for Fund B (SPYI), it is 0.68%. This means that for every £100 invested, Fund A charges 60 pence and Fund B charges 68 pence annually. These fees reduce the net return investors receive over time. When comparing ETFs, even small differences in expense ratios can impact long-term profitability, so it is essential to understand how these costs are applied and how they affect overall investment performance.

How do the dividend yields of QDPL and SPYI compare?

Dividend yield is a critical metric for income-focused investors. Fund A (QDPL) offers a dividend yield of 4.57%, while Fund B (SPYI) provides a significantly higher yield of 11.79%. This difference reflects the distinct income-generation strategies each fund employs. While Fund A delivers consistent cash flow through dividend-paying stocks, Fund B leverages derivative strategies to enhance distributions. Investors should assess their income needs carefully, considering both the yield percentage and the underlying strategy's potential risks, to determine which approach aligns with their long-term objectives.

Why might QDPL's top holdings include high-growth tech stocks?

Fund A (QDPL) includes significant positions in high-growth technology stocks such as NVDA and AAPL, which may seem unusual for a dividend-focused fund. This reflects a shift towards companies with strong cash flows and market dominance, which are often considered reliable dividend payers. However, this approach can lead to higher volatility compared to traditional low-beta income strategies. Investors should assess the fund's composition and consider whether the inclusion of growth stocks aligns with their risk tolerance and investment goals, as the balance between growth and income is a defining characteristic of this fund.

What are the risks associated with SPYI's derivative income strategy?

Fund B (SPYI) uses a derivative income strategy to achieve its high dividend yield of 11.79%. While this can enhance returns and provide a hedge against market downturns, it also introduces complexities such as tax implications and potential risks not present in standard equity funds. Investors should understand that relying on derivatives requires careful consideration of counterparty risk, market conditions, and regulatory environments. This strategy may suit those seeking aggressive income generation but may not align with conservative investors prioritising stability and transparency in their portfolio.

How do liquidity and asset base affect ETFs like QDPL and SPYI?

Liquidity is essential for ETFs, as it determines how easily investors can buy or sell shares without impacting the price. Fund A (QDPL) has net assets of £1.8 billion, while Fund B (SPYI) holds £12.1 billion. A larger asset base typically correlates with better liquidity and market presence, reducing bid-ask spreads and improving trade execution. While Fund A remains stable, Fund B's substantial size enhances its attractiveness to high-volume traders. Investors should consider these liquidity factors when choosing between ETFs, as they directly influence transaction costs and overall investment efficiency.

Why are sector weights important for ETFs like QDPL and SPYI?

Sector weights reveal how a fund's holdings are distributed across various industries, impacting diversification and risk exposure. For both Fund A (QDPL) and Fund B (SPYI), sector weights are not available, limiting transparency regarding potential concentration risks. Without this data, investors cannot fully assess whether either fund is heavily weighted towards sectors like technology or financials. Understanding sector composition is crucial for gauging how external factors, such as economic shifts or regulatory changes, might influence each fund's performance. Therefore, investors should approach this data gap with caution and seek alternative methods to evaluate risk.

How do QDPL and SPYI compare in terms of inception dates?

Fund A (QDPL) was launched on 12 July 2021, while Fund B (SPYI) started trading on 30 August 2022. These inception dates indicate that Fund A has been operational for a longer period, allowing investors to assess its track record and performance consistency over multiple market cycles. In contrast, Fund B, being a newer fund, may still be in its developmental phase, with less historical data available for evaluation. Investors often consider such factors to understand the maturity and stability of ETFs, as longer operational history can provide more confidence in strategy execution and outcomes.

What does it mean that the index methodology is not available?

Index methodology outlines the rules for selecting and weighting holdings within a fund's portfolio. For both Fund A (QDPL) and Fund B (SPYI), this information is not available, which creates transparency issues for investors. Without access to the specific criteria used to select holdings, it becomes challenging to predict how these funds will behave in different market conditions. This lack of detail can hinder comprehensive risk assessments, especially for investors seeking to align their portfolios with specific strategies or market conditions. Therefore, it is vital to acknowledge these limitations when comparing ETFs.

How do top-10 holdings differ between QDPL and SPYI?

Both Fund A (QDPL) and Fund B (SPYI) share the same top-10 holdings: NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU, and TSLA. However, the weighting percentages differ slightly. For example, NVDA holds 7.39% in Fund A and 8.14% in Fund B. Similarly, AAPL accounts for 6.88% in Fund A and 7.52% in Fund B. These differences reflect variations in how each fund allocates capital within its top holdings, even when their overall exposure is similar. Investors should consider these minor discrepancies when evaluating portfolio composition and concentration risk, as they can impact performance outcomes.

What should beginners consider when comparing ETFs like QDPL and SPYI?

Beginners should examine factors such as expense ratios, dividend yields, and fund strategies when comparing ETFs. For instance, Fund A (QDPL) has a 0.60% expense ratio and a 4.57% dividend yield, while Fund B (SPYI) charges 0.68% with an 11.79% yield. Additionally, assess the fund's asset base, liquidity, and underlying holdings to understand potential risks and rewards. Transparency issues, such as undisclosed index methodology or sector weights, should also be considered. This comprehensive evaluation helps determine which fund aligns better with your investment goals and risk tolerance.

Why is QDPL described as a 'Dividend Multiplier 400' fund?

The name 'Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF' suggests that Fund A (QDPL) focuses on large-cap companies with potential for increased dividend payments. The '400' likely refers to its targeted portfolio size, emphasising a broad selection of stocks. However, the exact criteria for selecting these holdings remain unclear, as the index methodology is not available. This naming convention indicates an approach aimed at amplifying dividend income through strategic stock selection. Investors should evaluate how well this methodology aligns with their income objectives, keeping in mind the lack of transparency regarding specific selection rules.

What disclaimer applies to this ETF comparison?

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions, especially when considering ETFs like QDPL and SPYI. Data used in this comparison is sourced from Yahoo Finance and is accurate as of 22 September 2026. Always conduct thorough research and consider individual financial circumstances, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before committing to any asset class.

QDPL vs SPYI

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

QDPL

Metric

SPYI

0.60%

Expense Ratio

0.68%

4.57%

Dividend Yield

11.79%

$1.80B

Net Assets

$12.13B

521

Holdings

511

Jul 12, 2021

Inception Date

Aug 30, 2022

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Derivative Income

QDPL costs about $8.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	QDPL	SPYI
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	7.39%	8.14%
AAPLApple Inc.	6.88%	7.52%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	5.14%	5.65%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	3.42%	3.77%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	2.83%	3.09%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	2.29%	2.52%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	2.26%	2.49%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	2.08%	2.27%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	1.53%	1.67%
TSLATesla, Inc.	1.43%	1.58%

Discover More Comparisons

JEPI vs SPYI

Compare JEPI and SPYI ETFs. Analyze expense ratios of 0.35% and 0.68%, dividend yields of 8.09% and 11.79%, plus top holdings and strategy differences.

QQQI vs SPYI

Compare QQQI and SPYI on fees, holdings, and dividends. Both NEOS ETFs have a 0.68% expense ratio. Review performance data and tracking methods.

JEPQ vs SPYI

Compare JEPQ and SPYI ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, and dividend yields for these derivative income funds tracking different benchmarks.

Investment Analysis

QDPL

Pros

Fund A charges an expense ratio of 0.60%, making it a relatively affordable option for income-focused investors.
The fund maintains a substantial asset base of $1.8 billion, which can contribute to better liquidity and stability.
QDPL delivers a dividend yield of 4.57%, providing a consistent income stream for investors seeking regular cash flow.

Considerations

The index methodology is not available, limiting transparency regarding the specific criteria used to select holdings.
Sector weights are not disclosed, making it difficult for investors to assess potential sector concentration risks within the portfolio.
Top holdings include significant positions in high-growth technology stocks, which may not align with traditional low-beta income strategies.

SPYI

Pros

Fund B offers a high dividend yield of 11.79%, attracting investors seeking significant current income generation.
With net assets of $12.1 billion, the fund benefits from high liquidity and strong market presence.
The strategy involves derivatives income, potentially providing a hedge or enhanced return profile compared to standard equity funds.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.68% is higher than many traditional index funds, impacting net returns for long-term holders.
Like Fund A, the index methodology is not available, obscuring the exact rules governing portfolio composition and rebalancing.
The reliance on derivative strategies introduces complex tax implications and potential risks not present in simple equity index funds.

About QDPL and SPYI

QDPL (QDPL)

The Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF is a diversified exchange-traded fund designed to provide investors with exposure to large-cap US companies that are considered strong dividend payers. As of its inception in July 2021, the fund has grown to hold approximately 521 stocks, focusing on quality large-cap firms with the potential to increase their dividends over time. The fund features an expense ratio of 0.60% and currently holds net assets of USD 1.80 billion. Its reported dividend yield stands at 4.57%, offering a potential income stream for investors. However, like all investments, values can fluctuate, and dividend payments are not guaranteed. This ETF is suitable for investors seeking diversified exposure to US large-cap dividend strategies, though it is important to consider the risks involved, including market volatility and changes in company payout policies. Always assess whether this investment aligns with your financial goals and risk tolerance.

SPYI (SPYI)

The NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF is designed to provide investors with high monthly income by combining exposure to the S&P 500 index with a covered call strategy. This approach aims to generate option premium income to enhance yields, potentially at the cost of limited upside participation during strong bull markets. The fund is actively managed and maintains a large number of holdings to diversify its equity exposure. It may be suitable for investors seeking regular income streams, though high yields often come with increased complexity and different risk profiles compared to traditional index funds. Investors should consider that dividends are not guaranteed, can fluctuate significantly, and may include return of capital, which can erode net asset value over time.

Buy QDPL or SPYI in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

QDPL vs SPYI

Fund Snapshot