MTUMVFMO

MTUM vs VFMO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

This page compares MTUM and VFMO, examining fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, while VFMO is 0.13%. They share five top holdings, including ...

Investment Analysis

MTUM

MTUM

MTUM

Pros

  • Expense ratio is low at 0.15 per cent for a large US momentum factor fund.
  • Assets under management are substantial at 24.8 billion dollars, supporting liquidity.
  • Inception in 2013 provides a longer performance history than newer momentum products.

Considerations

  • Top holdings can be concentrated, with the largest position at 5.86 per cent.
  • Dividend yield is modest at 0.59 per cent, reflecting growth tilt.
  • Sector weights are not available, limiting transparency on industry exposure.
VFMO

VFMO

VFMO

Pros

  • Expense ratio is slightly lower at 0.13 per cent for US momentum exposure.
  • Top holdings are small at 1.24 per cent, indicating granular diversification.
  • Dividend yield is marginally higher at 0.61 per cent than its peer.

Considerations

  • Assets under management are smaller at 1.9 billion dollars, which may affect spread tightness.
  • Inception in 2018 means less historical performance data than earlier launches.
  • Sector weights are not available, so industry risks cannot be assessed from disclosures.

Buy MTUM or VFMO in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions