What is the difference between large blend and large value investing?

Large blend funds like JQUA (JP Morgan US Quality Factor ETF) combine elements of growth and value, seeking companies with quality characteristics. Large value funds like VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) focus on companies considered undervalued relative to fundamentals, often in sectors like financials and energy. Blend strategies aim for balanced exposure, while value targets assets trading below intrinsic worth. Understanding these distinctions helps investors assess which approach aligns with their market view and portfolio construction needs.

How does expense ratio affect long-term returns in ETFs?

The expense ratio represents annual fund management costs, deducted directly from assets. For JQUA, this is 0.12%, while VTV's is just 0.03%, a difference of 0.09 percentage points. Over time, higher fees reduce compounding potential. For example, on a £10,000 investment, JQUA costs £12 annually versus £3 for VTV. While both are low-cost options, the cumulative effect of even small differences can impact net returns, particularly over multi-year holding periods. Lower fees generally enhance long-term efficiency.

Why does sector concentration matter in ETF comparisons?

Sector concentration refers to how heavily an ETF is weighted toward specific industries. VTV shows greater concentration in financials and energy, which can amplify exposure to interest rate changes or commodity prices. JQUA holds a wider mix of mega-cap tech firms, raising potential sensitivity to technology valuations. Higher concentration can mean less diversification. Understanding sector makeup helps investors assess risk sources and ensure a fund's exposures complement, rather than duplicate, existing portfolio holdings.

What does dividend yield tell us about these ETFs?

JQUA's 1.05% dividend yield is lower than VTV's 1.85%, reflecting their differing strategies. VTV's higher yield aligns with typical value stocks, which often pay more regular dividends. JQUA's yield suggests a focus on firms prioritizing capital growth or quality metrics over immediate income. Neither yield alone indicates superior performance, but investors seeking income may find VTV more aligned with those objectives, while JQUA may attract those prioritising growth potential alongside income.

How do the funds' holdings reflect their investing style?

JQUA holds significant positions in large-cap tech stocks like Apple and NVIDIA, reflecting its quality factor approach. VTV's top holdings include more financials and energy names like MU and XOM. Their shared holdings in MU and XOM reveal some overlap. JQUA's tech-heavy tilt suggests growth-oriented selection, while VTV's financial/energy emphasis confirms its value strategy. The top holdings directly evidence each fund's pursuit of different market segments.

What are the potential advantages of a lower expense ratio like VTV's?

VTV's 0.03% expense ratio is exceptionally low compared to JQUA's 0.12%. This lower cost directly benefits investors by preserving more capital for investment. While 0.09 percentage points seems small, over ten years the compounding effect can result in meaningful differences in net returns. Investors should consider this cost efficiency alongside VTV's extensive track record and large asset base, which also suggest high liquidity and stability.

How does fund liquidity compare between these two ETFs?

VTV boasts net assets of £191.1 billion compared to JQUA's £9.3 billion. This substantial difference implies VTV will likely trade with tighter bid-ask spreads and lower market impact for larger transactions. JQUA's £9.3 billion still indicates moderate liquidity. Investors should weigh the benefit of VTV's superior liquidity against the potential costs associated with large trades in JQUA. Higher AUM generally correlates with smoother trading execution.

How does the track record of each ETF compare?

VTV has been established since 2004, offering over 19 years of history across different market cycles. JQUA launched in November 2017, meaning it has just over 8 years of data. This longer history means investors can review VTV's performance under various conditions, from pre-financial crisis to current high-rate environments. While JQUA's track record is substantial, its shorter span limits insights into how its quality strategy behaves through prolonged market downturns.

What risks arise from high concentration in technology for JQUA?

JQUA's top holdings are heavily weighted toward large-cap tech names like Apple, AMD, NVIDIA and Microsoft. This concentration means the fund's performance is significantly influenced by the tech sector's trajectory. Adverse regulatory changes, innovation delays, or shifts in technology sentiment could impact the fund more dramatically than in a more diversified ETF like VTV. Investors should be comfortable with potential volatility if tech stocks underperform.

What sector risks are highlighted in VTV's composition?

VTV has a pronounced exposure to financials and energy, as seen in its top holdings like JPMorgan, Berkshire Hathaway, ExxonMobil, and Johnson & Johnson. This makes the fund sensitive to interest rate policy and economic cycles impacting banks, and to commodity prices like oil and gas. An economic downturn or regulatory tightening in finance could weigh on VTV's performance differently than JQUA's tech focus.

Which type of investor goal might each fund support?

JQUA might suit an investor seeking quality large-cap stocks with moderate exposure to tech innovation and some income. Its higher costs may be acceptable for those prioritising the quality factor. VTV could be preferable for investors focused on lower costs, higher dividend yield, or a strategic tilt towards financials and energy as a value portfolio complement. Goal fit depends on an investor's risk tolerance and cost sensitivity.

Why might an investor consider using both in a portfolio?

An investor might combine JQUA and VTV to achieve exposure to both quality and value factors. JQUA's blend strategy and tech focus can complement VTV's value-oriented financial and energy holdings, potentially providing a more balanced portfolio construction across different market cycles. Overlapping holdings like MU and XOM suggest some shared large-cap exposure. Using both could diversify sources of risk.

JQUA vs VTV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare JP Morgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) to review their fees, holdings, and dividends. This page examines how each fund tracks its respective market category, from large blend to large value, highlighting distinct characteristics such as their expense ratios and dividend yields. Explore the details to understand the differences between these two exchange-traded funds. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

JQUA

Metric

VTV

0.12%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.05%

Dividend Yield

1.85%

$9.28B

Net Assets

$191.07B

312

Holdings

319

Nov 8, 2017

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Value

VTV costs about $9.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	JQUA	VTV
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	2.01%	3.94%
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	1.79%	2.43%

Discover More Comparisons

JQUA vs SPYM

Compare JQUA and SPYM ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. JQUA charges 0.12% with $9.3bn assets; SPYM charges 0.02% with $157.4bn.

JQUA vs SPY

Compare JQUA and SPY ETFs. Review expense ratios, top holdings, dividend yields and tracking methods to understand their structural differences and costs.

JQUA vs SPHQ

Compare JQUA and SPHQ ETFs on fees, holdings, and dividends. JQUA charges 0.12% while SPHQ is 0.15%, both targeting quality in large-cap stocks.

Investment Analysis

JQUA

Pros

Modest expense ratio of 0.12% supports reasonable cost efficiency for investors.
Large net assets of $9.3 billion enhance liquidity and trading depth.
Longer history since 2017 provides some track record for performance evaluation.

Considerations

Low dividend yield of 1.05% may deter income-focused investors.
High concentration in mega-cap technology stocks can elevate idiosyncratic risk.
Index methodology is not available, limiting transparency in quality criteria.

VTV

Pros

Very low expense ratio of 0.03% reduces investment costs significantly.
Extensive net assets of $191.1 billion provide superior liquidity and market impact.
Established history since 2004 offers extensive track record for long-term assessment.

Considerations

Moderate dividend yield of 1.85% may be insufficient for income-focused investors.
Concentration in financial and energy stocks can heighten sector-specific risks.
Index methodology is not available, reducing transparency in value selection criteria.

About JQUA and VTV

JQUA (JQUA)

The JP Morgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is an exchange-traded fund designed to help investors gain exposure to high-quality US equities. With a Large Blend category, it targets companies exhibiting strong balance sheets, consistent earnings, and favourable cash flow characteristics. Since its inception in November 2017, the fund has grown significantly, managing net assets of USD 9.28 billion across 312 holdings. It offers a relatively low expense ratio of 0.12%, making it an accessible option for those seeking factor-based strategies without heavy costs. Investors receive a dividend yield of 1.05%, reflecting the fund's focus on mature, financially sound companies. As with any investment, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed, so understanding the underlying quality factors is essential for suitability.

VTV (VTV)

The Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a large-cap value fund designed to track the performance of US large-capitalisation companies considered to have value characteristics. Launched in January 2004, it currently holds a diverse portfolio of 319 stocks. With a very low expense ratio of just 0.03%, it offers investors a cost-effective way to access established US companies that may be trading at lower prices relative to their fundamental metrics. The fund has accumulated net assets of approximately USD 191.07 billion, indicating significant liquidity and investor confidence. It currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%. While value strategies can offer potential advantages during market rotations, like all investments, the value of shares can fall as well as rise, and returns are not guaranteed. This fund is generally suitable for investors seeking diversified exposure to the US large-cap value segment as part of a broader portfolio strategy.

Buy JQUA or VTV in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

JQUA vs VTV

Fund Snapshot