What are expense ratios and why do they matter?

Expense ratios represent the annual cost of owning a fund, deducted from assets. JQUA charges 0.12%, while SCHD charges 0.06%. This 0.06 percentage point difference is relatively small for a single year, but it compounds over time. Higher fees can reduce net returns in long-term holding periods. When comparing ETFs, always assess expense ratios alongside other features, as lower costs do not guarantee better performance. Investors should view fees as one factor among many in their evaluation process.

How do ETF categories like Large Blend and Large Value differ?

JQUA is categorized as a large blend fund, targeting quality factors across various market segments without strict value or growth bias. SCHD is a large value fund focusing on dividend-paying stocks with traditional value characteristics. Large blend ETFs offer broader equity exposure, while large value ETFs emphasise lower-priced stocks relative to earnings. These category differences influence the underlying portfolio composition and may lead to varying performance in different economic environments. Investors should understand that category labels indicate different approaches to stock selection and risk positioning within US equity markets.

Which fund typically suits income-focused investors?

SCHD is generally associated with income-oriented strategies due to its 3.11% dividend yield, which exceeds JQUA's 1.05% yield. Investors seeking regular cash distributions may find SCHD more aligned with their goals, as higher yields typically correlate with more frequent income payments. However, yield alone does not determine overall returns; capital appreciation also matters. JQUA's lower yield suggests a growth-oriented approach where gains come primarily from stock price increases rather than dividends. The choice between income and growth strategies depends on individual financial objectives and tax considerations.

How do the top holdings of JQUA and SCHD differ?

JQUA's top ten holdings feature high-growth technology companies, including Apple and Microsoft, with weights under 2.2%. In contrast, SCHD's leading positions include defensive blue-chip names like Merck and Coca-Cola, with weights ranging from 3.69% to 4.89%. Notably, none of the top ten holdings are shared between these two ETFs. This significant divergence indicates that JQUA emphasises technology-driven growth, while SCHD prioritises established dividend-paying companies across healthcare and consumer staples sectors, reflecting fundamentally different investment philosophies.

What does quality factor investing mean in JQUA?

JQUA focuses on quality factors, typically involving stocks with strong fundamentals like consistent earnings growth, healthy balance sheets, and stable cash flows. While specific index methodology is not available, the fund's large blend classification and technology-heavy top holdings suggest exposure to high-quality companies with growth characteristics. This approach aims to capture firms that demonstrate resilience across economic cycles. Investors should understand that quality factors often correlate with lower volatility and better long-term performance compared to broader market indices.

How do dividend yields impact overall investment returns?

Dividend yield represents annual income as a percentage of share price. SCHD's 3.11% yield suggests higher income generation compared to JQUA's 1.05% yield. However, total returns comprise both income and capital appreciation. JQUA's technology-heavy portfolio may offer higher growth potential through stock price increases, while SCHD's defensive holdings provide steadier income but potentially lower appreciation. Investors should consider their total return needs: those requiring immediate cash flow might prefer SCHD, while growth-oriented investors could look towards JQUA's market exposure. Yield differences don't guarantee superior long-term outcomes.

How do these ETFs perform in different market conditions?

SCHD, with its large value and dividend focus, may perform well during economic downturns when investors seek stability and income. Its defensive sector tilt could cushion against market declines. JQUA's quality growth approach, featuring technology exposure, might outperform in robust economic expansion periods when risk appetite is higher. Neither strategy guarantees consistent outperformance; each has pros and cons depending on market phases. Investors should understand that JQUA has high-growth tech concentration while SCHD prioritises defensive sectors.

What should investors consider when choosing between JQUA and SCHD?

Key considerations include investment objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon. JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio with 1.05% yield suits growth-focused investors willing to accept technology concentration risks. SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio and 3.11% yield appeals to income seekers with lower fee sensitivity. Both funds have substantial assets, ensuring liquidity. Sector concentration differs: JQUA leans towards technology, while SCHD emphasises healthcare and consumer staples. Investors should evaluate how each aligns with their broader portfolio needs rather than viewing them in isolation.

How does fund size influence investor decisions?

Net assets indicate fund scale and liquidity. SCHD holds $112.8 billion, offering high trading volumes and tighter bid-ask spreads. JQUA manages $9.3 billion, which remains sufficient for most retail investors but may experience wider spreads during volatile markets. Larger funds like SCHD typically benefit from economies of scale, potentially supporting lower expense ratios. However, size alone shouldn't drive investment choices. Both funds are substantial enough to avoid closure risks, so investors should focus on strategy alignment and personal financial goals rather than asset size alone.

What does inception date tell us about ETF performance?

JQUA launched on November 8, 2017, while SCHD began trading on October 20, 2011. SCHD's longer track record provides approximately six additional years of performance history, allowing for more comprehensive assessment across different market cycles. Investors can review how SCHD responded to various economic conditions, including market downturns. JQUA's shorter history means less long-term data is available for evaluation. Both funds have been in existence long enough to demonstrate initial track records, but SCHD offers more extensive performance analysis. Inception dates should be considered alongside other factors when evaluating ETFs.

How do fund strategies differ in approach to equity exposure?

JQUA targets quality factors within large blend categories, selecting companies with strong fundamentals without rigid value or growth constraints. Its holdings reflect technology sector prominence with weights under 2.2%. SCHD employs large value strategies focused on sustainable dividend payouts, with more substantial top holdings at 3.69-4.89%. The funds show no shared top ten positions, indicating fundamentally different portfolio construction methods. JQUA seeks growth through quality screening, while SCHD emphasises income through value-oriented stock selection, each offering distinct pathways to US equity market participation.

What information is not available about these ETFs?

Both funds list their specific index tracking as not available in the provided data, limiting transparency into their exact methodologies. Additionally, sector weight breakdowns are not available for either JQUA or SCHD, meaning investors cannot precisely assess geographic or industry concentration risks through this data source. While top holdings are known, complete portfolio composition remains partially unclear. Investors should note these limitations when evaluating the funds and consider that JQUA focuses on quality factors while SCHD targets dividend payers, though exact index construction details cannot be verified from available information.

JQUA vs SCHD

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare the JP Morgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and the US Dividend Equity ETF Schwab (SCHD). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. JQUA focuses on large blend quality factors, while SCHD targets large value dividend stocks. Both offer distinct strategies for investors seeking US equity exposure. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

JQUA

Metric

SCHD

0.12%

Expense Ratio

0.06%

1.05%

Dividend Yield

3.11%

$9.28B

Net Assets

$112.77B

312

Holdings

102

Nov 8, 2017

Inception Date

Oct 20, 2011

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Value

SCHD costs about $6.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

JQUA vs SPYM

Compare JQUA and SPYM ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. JQUA charges 0.12% with $9.3bn assets; SPYM charges 0.02% with $157.4bn.

JQUA vs SPY

Compare JQUA and SPY ETFs. Review expense ratios, top holdings, dividend yields and tracking methods to understand their structural differences and costs.

JQUA vs SPHQ

Compare JQUA and SPHQ ETFs on fees, holdings, and dividends. JQUA charges 0.12% while SPHQ is 0.15%, both targeting quality in large-cap stocks.

Investment Analysis

JQUA

Pros

The JQUA fund has a low 0.12% expense ratio that is competitive with many other factor-based ETFs.
With $9.3 billion in net assets, JQUA is a substantial fund that is unlikely to be closed.
JQUA is a large blend category fund offering diversified exposure to the broad US equity market.

Considerations

The 1.05% dividend yield is very low, which might not suit investors seeking income.
The fund has a relatively high concentration in volatile, high-growth technology stocks.
The specific index tracked by the fund is not available, limiting transparency into its strategy.

SCHD

Pros

SCHD has an extremely low 0.06% expense ratio, making it one of the cheapest dividend funds available.
The 3.11% dividend yield is significantly higher than most broad market ETFs.
With $112.8 billion in assets, SCHD is an exceptionally large and liquid fund.

Considerations

Its Large Value and income focus often results in underperformance during strong bull markets.
The top 10 holdings are concentrated in defensive sectors like healthcare, consumer staples, and energy.
Information on the specific index methodology is not available from the provided data.

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About JQUA and SCHD

JQUA (JQUA)

The JP Morgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is an exchange-traded fund designed to help investors gain exposure to high-quality US equities. With a Large Blend category, it targets companies exhibiting strong balance sheets, consistent earnings, and favourable cash flow characteristics. Since its inception in November 2017, the fund has grown significantly, managing net assets of USD 9.28 billion across 312 holdings. It offers a relatively low expense ratio of 0.12%, making it an accessible option for those seeking factor-based strategies without heavy costs. Investors receive a dividend yield of 1.05%, reflecting the fund's focus on mature, financially sound companies. As with any investment, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed, so understanding the underlying quality factors is essential for suitability.

SCHD (SCHD)

SCHD (Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF) is an exchange‑traded fund that aims to provide exposure to high-quality U.S. companies that have a history of paying dividends. Managed by Charles Schwab, the ETF screens for firms with stable earnings, reasonable payout ratios and consistent dividend records, concentrating on large‑cap names across a range of sectors. Investors often use SCHD for income and as a core holding to capture dividend yield with the diversification and liquidity of an ETF. It is designed to be a low‑cost, transparent vehicle, though dividends and share prices can fall and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Suitable for investors seeking income and long‑term total return, it may not fit those focused solely on capital growth or who require guarantees. As with any investment, consider costs, tax treatment and how it fits your wider portfolio before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Following Charles Schwab's massive $20 billion stock buyback and dividend increase, this theme focuses on other financially robust companies that are similarly rewarding their investors. The strategy is to invest in firms with strong cash flows and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Buy JQUA or SCHD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

JQUA vs SCHD

Fund Snapshot