What does category 'Derivative Income' mean for ETFs?

Category 'Derivative Income' signifies that both JEPQ and QYLG aim to generate returns primarily through financial derivatives, particularly options strategies like covered calls. This approach differs from traditional equity ETFs that simply replicate index performance. The use of derivatives introduces unique risks and complexities, such as structural complexity and specific income generation mechanics, which investors must understand when evaluating these funds.

How does the expense ratio for JEPQ compare with QYLG?

Both JEPQ and QYLG have an identical expense ratio of 0.35%. This means that for every $1,000 invested, each fund charges $3.50 annually to cover management fees and operational costs. Since the expenses are the same, the cost difference is 0.00 percentage points. When comparing fees, it is important to consider how such operational costs impact net returns over time, regardless of how the underlying strategies might differ in implementation.

What does the 0.35% expense ratio mean for both funds?

A 0.35% expense ratio is a standard annual management fee charged by JPMorgan for JEPQ and Global X for QYLG. Over time, a lower expense ratio means a larger portion of gross investment returns stays within the portfolio. Since JEPQ and QYLG have identical expense ratios of 0.35%, cost is not a differentiating factor when assessing these funds. Instead, investors should focus on structural complexity and operational capacity, which JEPQ benefits from due to its substantial $43 billion asset base and issuer expertise.

How do the two funds track the Nasdaq?

Both JEPQ and QYLG focus on Nasdaq-listed companies but do not have a specific index tracked listed in their available data. They primarily use covered call strategies for income generation. This approach often caps the upside potential of the underlying Nasdaq 100 assets while still providing dividends. Because their specific tracking methods are not available, investors should note that the exposure is not a pure replication of a benchmark but involves derivative overlay strategies that alter typical price performance characteristics relative to the market.

Why is the 'index tracked' field 'not available' for both funds?

For JEPQ and QYLG, the 'index tracked' field is listed as not available because they are actively managed or use derivative overlay strategies (covered calls) rather than simply replicating a specific passive index. Unlike standard ETFs, their performance is driven by active strategy adjustments involving options premiums and equity selection within the Nasdaq universe. Consequently, there is no single benchmark index they passively follow, which is why this field is marked as not available in their financial data. This structural difference impacts how their exposure and returns are generated compared to traditional passive funds.

How do the top holdings overlap in JEPQ and QYLG?

JEPQ and QYLG share nine of their top ten holdings, focusing heavily on the Nasdaq 100. The overlap includes major tech stocks like NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOG, MU, AMZN, AMD, META, and TSLA. This extensive commonality indicates high concentration risk in the same large-cap technology firms. However, the specific weights differ slightly; for instance, QYLG allocates more heavily to NVDA (8.44%) compared to JEPQ (7.26%). Despite these minor variations, the portfolio construction is largely similar, leading to comparable market exposures and sector-specific vulnerabilities.

What does the dividend yield tell us about these funds?

The dividend yield indicates the annual income generated as a percentage of the fund's price. QYLG currently offers a 16.72% yield, compared to JEPQ's 11.07%. This higher yield for QYLG suggests more significant income generation from option premiums, though it may reflect different strategy implementations or market pricing. These yields provide monthly income generation for investors, but potential investors must consider that high yields in derivative income funds can fluctuate based on the performance of the underlying strategy and the level of volatility in the Nasdaq 100 components.

What are the inception dates of JEPQ and QYLG?

JEPQ was launched on May 3, 2022, while QYLG was established earlier on September 18, 2020. This makes QYLG's operating history longer by nearly two years. Despite this time difference, both funds still have a relatively short track record compared to traditional index ETFs. Consequently, long-term performance data for these derivative income strategies is limited. Investors should consider this short operating history when assessing the consistency and effectiveness of the covered call strategies across various market cycles and periods of volatility.

What is sector-specific risk in these ETFs?

Both JEPQ and QYLG exhibit high concentration risk, heavily invested in large-cap technology firms within the Nasdaq 100. Since both funds allocate the majority of their assets to similar technology stocks, they are equally vulnerable to sector-specific downturns or shifts in the tech market. While the fund data shows sector weights are not available, the significant holdings in companies like NVDA and AAPL (and MSFT, GOOG, etc.) confirm the dominance of the technology and communication services sectors. This concentration means that if the tech sector underperforms, both funds will likely reflect that negative movement, regardless of their derivative income strategies.

Why do covered call strategies add structural complexity?

Covered call strategies used by both JEPQ and QYLG involve holding underlying stocks and selling call options. This introduces structural complexity because the fund's performance depends on the interplay between stock prices and option premiums, which can differ from simple equity ownership. This complexity can make it harder to track exactly how the fund is performing against the market or its underlying assets. It impacts income stability and upside potential. The strategy creates a unique risk profile where option market dynamics and expiry dates play a significant role in the fund's day-to-day performance and overall returns, unlike simple passive ETFs.

What does the net assets difference mean for liquidity?

JEPQ holds $43.0 billion in net assets, indicating substantial scale and likely efficient operational capacity and liquidity. In contrast, QYLG has only $175 million in net assets, meaning it faces significantly lower liquidity. A smaller asset base can sometimes lead to wider bid-ask spreads and make it more difficult to trade larger amounts without affecting the fund's price. Investors should consider the impact of this lower scale on potential transaction costs and liquidity availability when trading QYLG compared to the much larger, highly liquid JEPQ fund in the secondary market.

JEPQ vs QYLG

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

JEPQ and QYLG both track the Nasdaq with covered calls. Compare fees, holdings, and dividends to see how JPMorgan and Global X deliver income. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

JEPQ

Metric

QYLG

0.35%

Expense Ratio

0.35%

11.07%

Dividend Yield

16.72%

$43.02B

Net Assets

$174.84M

110

Holdings

104

May 3, 2022

Inception Date

Sep 18, 2020

–

Index Tracked

–

Derivative Income

Fund Category

Derivative Income

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	JEPQ	QYLG
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	7.26%	8.44%
AAPLApple Inc.	6.62%	7.73%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	5.07%	5.77%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	4.83%	3.00%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	4.80%	4.99%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	3.84%	4.31%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.	3.64%	3.97%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	2.75%	3.11%
TSLATesla, Inc.	2.05%	3.01%

Discover More Comparisons

JEPQ vs QYLD

Compare JEPQ vs QYLD on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking methods. Review expense ratios, asset sizes and strategy differences between these two ETFs.

JEPQ vs SPYI

Compare JEPQ and SPYI ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, and dividend yields for these derivative income funds tracking different benchmarks.

JEPQ vs QQQI

Compare JEPQ and QQQI. Analyse expense ratios, dividend yields, top holdings and derivative income strategies to determine which ETF suits your research goals.

Investment Analysis

JEPQ

Pros

JEPQ holds $43 billion in assets, providing substantial scale and likely efficient operational capacity.
Managed by JPMorgan, the fund benefits from a highly regarded global issuer's expertise.
Its 11.07% dividend yield offers significant monthly income generation for investors.

Considerations

JEPQ launched in May 2022, meaning it has a relatively short operating track record.
Top holdings like NVDA and AAPL create considerable concentration risk in large-cap tech firms.
A 0.35% expense ratio is moderate, but the derivative strategy adds structural complexity.

QYLG

Pros

QYLG's 16.72% dividend yield represents a very high income potential from option premiums.
It offers slightly different exposure, with NVDA at 8.44% and AAPL at 7.73%.
Global X provides a specialised focus on covered call strategies within the Nasdaq 100.

Considerations

With only $175 million in net assets, QYLG faces significantly lower liquidity than peers.
Inception in September 2020 still results in a limited long-term performance history.
High concentration in the same top technology stocks creates similar sector-specific risks.

About JEPQ and QYLG

JEPQ (JEPQ)

The JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is an exchange-traded fund designed to generate monthly income while retaining growth potential from the Nasdaq 100 index. Rather than simply replicating the index, JEPQ primarily holds large-cap Nasdaq stocks but uses a strategy involving the sale of call options to produce premium income. This approach aims to offer investors a high-yield dividend stream, which can be attractive for those seeking regular cash flow. However, it is important to note that this strategy may cap potential upside during periods of strong market rallies. As with any investment involving derivatives and equity exposure, values can fluctuate, and income payouts are not guaranteed. It suits investors looking for income generation but requires an understanding of the trade-off between immediate yield and long-term capital appreciation.

QYLG (QYLG)

The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) aims to generate income and potential capital growth by investing in the Nasdaq-100 Index. This ETF uses a covered call strategy, selling call options on the underlying index to earn option premiums. A key distinction is that it only sells 50% of the index's upside, potentially allowing for more capital appreciation compared to standard covered call ETFs. It appeals to investors seeking regular income from a high-growth sector while balancing upside potential. However, the dividend yield can fluctuate, and performance is capped by the strategy. Investors should be aware that while this approach targets income and growth, it involves risks associated with options, market volatility, and the specific performance of the Nasdaq-100 companies. Returns are not guaranteed, and values can rise and fall.

Buy JEPQ or QYLG in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

JEPQ vs QYLG

Fund Snapshot