What does 'Derivative Income' mean for these ETFs?

Derivative Income ETFs, like JEPI and JEPQ, aim to generate current income alongside capital appreciation. They typically hold a diversified equity portfolio and write (sell) call options on a portion of that portfolio. The premiums received from these options create additional income, often distributed as dividends. However, writing calls can cap potential upside in strong bull markets, as the fund may need to deliver shares at the strike price. This strategy alters the traditional equity growth profile, prioritising regular cash flow.

Are JEPI and JEPQ considered active or passive ETFs?

Both JEPI and JEPQ are generally classified as active ETFs, even if they track an index. The 'active' component lies in the options strategy: the manager decides which equity positions to cover and when to write calls, rather than simply replicating an index's weights mechanically. While they may follow a broad equity index for the underlying holdings, the derivative overlay is actively managed to target specific income levels. This differs from traditional passive funds that solely track an index without derivative overlays.

What does it mean when the 'Index tracked' is listed as 'not available'?

For both JEPI and JEPQ, the 'Index tracked' is listed as not available in the provided data. This typically means the ETF is actively managed rather than strictly passively tracking a public benchmark index, or the specific custom index used for reference is proprietary and not widely publicised. Consequently, investors cannot easily assess tracking error against a standard public index like the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100. Performance evaluation relies more on comparing the ETF's results to its stated objectives and peer group rather than a single, clear passive benchmark.

What are the expense ratios for JEPI and JEPQ, and how do they compare?

Based on the provided data, both JEPI and JEPQ have an expense ratio of 0.35%. Since the fees are identical, there is no difference in percentage points. An expense ratio of 0.35% is relatively high compared to broad passive equity ETFs but is common for funds employing complex derivative strategies. This fee covers portfolio management and the operational costs of the options overlay. Investors should note that while fees are the same, the underlying exposures and potential return profiles differ significantly due to their distinct equity portfolios and option strategies.

How do the top holdings of JEPI and JEPQ differ in concentration?

JEPI's top ten holdings range from 1.70% to 1.94%, indicating a highly diversified equity sleeve with low single-stock concentration. In contrast, JEPQ's top five holdings alone account for 28.58%, with significant positions in NVDA (7.26%) and AAPL (6.62%). This means JEPQ is substantially more concentrated in mega-cap technology stocks. While this may align closely with tech momentum, it also increases sensitivity to the performance of a small number of stocks compared to JEPI's broader, more evenly weighted equity base.

How do the dividend yields of JEPI and JEPQ compare?

JEPQ offers a higher dividend yield of 11.07% compared to JEPI's 8.09%. This difference reflects their underlying equity exposures and options strategies. JEPQ's concentration in Nasdaq technology leaders and potentially higher implied volatility in those stocks can generate larger option premiums, boosting income. JEPI's broader, more diversified equity sleeve may produce lower option premiums, resulting in a lower yield. Investors should understand that higher yields often come with greater concentration risk and volatility, and past yields do not guarantee future distributions.

What are the shared top-10 holdings between JEPI and JEPQ?

According to the data, both JEPI and JEPQ include MSFT, AAPL, META, AMZN, and NVDA among their top ten holdings. However, their weights differ significantly. For instance, NVDA is 1.87% in JEPI but 7.26% in JEPQ. This shared presence indicates both funds have exposure to large-cap US technology and growth stocks, though JEPQ is much more heavily weighted towards them. JEPI's approach spreads exposure across a wider range of names, reducing individual stock impact compared to JEPQ's concentrated tech tilt.

How do JEPI and JEPQ differ in their underlying market exposure?

JEPI provides exposure to a broad, highly diversified equity portfolio, with top holdings ranging widely across sectors and a low concentration in any single stock. Its largest holding is only 1.94%. In contrast, JEPQ offers concentrated exposure to Nasdaq technology leaders, reflecting the performance of large-cap tech. With top holdings like NVDA at 7.26% and AAPL at 6.62%, JEPQ's returns are more closely tied to the momentum and volatility of the tech sector. JEPI is less sensitive to individual tech stock movements due to its diversification.

What is the inception date difference between JEPI and JEPQ?

JEPI was launched on May 20, 2020, while JEPQ began trading on May 3, 2022. This means JEPI has a longer performance history, approximately two years more. A longer history can provide more data points for assessing how the fund has behaved across different market conditions, though the covered call strategy is relatively new for many investors. JEPQ's shorter history means less empirical evidence exists on its performance through varied market cycles, which may be a consideration for investors seeking established track records.

What are the net assets of JEPI and JEPQ, and why do they matter?

JEPI has net assets of $45.3 billion, and JEPQ has $43.0 billion. Both are very large funds, which supports strong liquidity and typically leads to tighter bid-offer spreads for traders. Large asset bases also reduce concerns about fund viability, as they are less likely to close due to insufficient size. While both funds are similarly large and liquid, JEPQ's slightly smaller size doesn't materially impact its liquidity compared to JEPI. Investors can generally expect efficient trading in both.

How should investors interpret the 'Sector weights: not available' data point?

For both JEPI and JEPQ, sector weights are listed as not available in the provided dataset. This limits an investor's ability to quickly assess the exact sector allocation without digging into detailed holdings or manager reports. However, by examining the top holdings, one can infer significant technology exposure, especially in JEPQ (e.g., NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOG, MU, AMD). The absence of explicit sector weights means investors must rely more on individual stock positions to gauge diversification and sector concentration.

Which fund might suit an investor seeking broader diversification versus concentrated tech exposure?

An investor seeking broader diversification within a covered call framework might lean towards JEPI, given its highly diversified equity sleeve with top holdings capped at ~1.94%. Those preferring concentrated exposure to large-cap technology momentum and potentially higher income (11.07% yield) might look at JEPQ, despite its higher concentration risk. This choice depends on whether the goal is mitigating single-stock impact (JEPI) or aligning closely with tech sector performance (JEPQ). Educational purposes only; not advice.

JEPI vs JEPQ

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) by examining their fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

JEPI

Metric

JEPQ

0.35%

Expense Ratio

0.35%

8.09%

Dividend Yield

11.07%

$45.26B

Net Assets

$43.02B

136

Holdings

110

May 20, 2020

Inception Date

May 3, 2022

–

Index Tracked

–

Derivative Income

Fund Category

Derivative Income

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	JEPI	JEPQ
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	1.94%	5.07%
AAPLApple Inc.	1.93%	6.62%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	1.91%	2.75%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	1.87%	3.84%
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	1.87%	7.26%

Discover More Comparisons

JEPI vs SPYI

Compare JEPI and SPYI ETFs. Analyze expense ratios of 0.35% and 0.68%, dividend yields of 8.09% and 11.79%, plus top holdings and strategy differences.

JEPI vs SCHD

Compare JEPI and SCHD ETFs. Analyse 0.35% vs 0.06% fees, 8.09% vs 3.11% yields, holdings differences and derivative income strategies for research.

JEPI vs QQQI

Compare JEPI vs QQQI on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. Review expense ratios, assets, yields and inception dates for both JPMorgan and Neos funds.

Investment Analysis

JEPI

Pros

The fund is large and liquid with net assets of £45.3 billion, which reduces concerns about fund viability and supports tighter bid-offer spreads for larger trading sizes.
It has a relatively high dividend yield of 8.09% versus broader equity funds, which may appeal to investors seeking regular cash flow from a diversified equity sleeve combined with covered call strategies.
The equity sleeve appears highly diversified, as the top ten positions range from 1.70% to 1.94%, lowering single-stock concentration risk compared with tech-heavy Nasdaq-linked income funds.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.35% is high for a passive-style equity fund, and covered-call income can cap upside so fees may be more noticeable during strong bull markets.
The index tracked is not available, which can make it harder for investors to benchmark the portfolio against a clear passive reference and to assess tracking error expectations.
The derivative income strategy can change the fund’s tax treatment of distributions, potentially reducing after-income tax efficiency depending on investor jurisdiction and account wrapper.

JEPQ

Pros

It offers a substantially higher dividend yield of 11.07% than JEPI, which may attract income-oriented investors seeking greater current distribution levels from the covered call strategy.
The fund is also very large at £43.0 billion net assets, supporting market maker engagement and typically improving liquidity relative to smaller derivative income ETFs.
It provides concentrated exposure to Nasdaq technology leaders, with top holdings including NVDA at 7.26% and AAPL at 6.62%, potentially aligning closely with large-cap tech momentum themes.

Considerations

The strategy is notably concentrated, as the top five positions alone account for 28.58% of the portfolio, meaning returns may be highly sensitive to a small number of mega-cap technology stocks.
The fund is younger than JEPI, launched on 3 May 2022, so the performance history is shorter and may be less representative of how the portfolio behaves across multiple market cycles.
The index tracked is not available, limiting straightforward benchmarking and potentially making it more difficult to evaluate how much of performance stems from the index design versus manager implementation choices.

About JEPI and JEPQ

JEPI (JEPI)

The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) is designed to provide investors with a combination of potential income and moderate equity market exposure. It typically achieves this by holding a portfolio of US equity securities while using covered call options to generate additional premium income. The fund has a net asset value of USD 45.26 billion and currently holds 136 positions, focusing on large-capitalisation companies with lower volatility characteristics. With an expense ratio of 0.35%, it remains competitive within its sector. Investors often consider JEPI for its relatively high reported dividend yield of 8.09%, which is derived from both underlying stock dividends and option premiums. However, it is important to remember that the use of derivatives can cap upside potential during strong market rallies. As with any investment, values can rise and fall, and past yields are not guaranteed for the future. This product is generally suitable for those seeking income strategies within the equity market, subject to individual risk tolerance.

JEPQ (JEPQ)

The JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is an exchange-traded fund designed to generate monthly income while retaining growth potential from the Nasdaq 100 index. Rather than simply replicating the index, JEPQ primarily holds large-cap Nasdaq stocks but uses a strategy involving the sale of call options to produce premium income. This approach aims to offer investors a high-yield dividend stream, which can be attractive for those seeking regular cash flow. However, it is important to note that this strategy may cap potential upside during periods of strong market rallies. As with any investment involving derivatives and equity exposure, values can fluctuate, and income payouts are not guaranteed. It suits investors looking for income generation but requires an understanding of the trade-off between immediate yield and long-term capital appreciation.

Buy JEPI or JEPQ in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

JEPI vs JEPQ

Fund Snapshot