What is the difference between IYG and XLF regarding their expense ratios?

The expense ratio is the annual fee investors pay for fund management. IYG (stock_1) has an expense ratio of 0.37%, while XLF (stock_2) charges 0.08%. This means XLF is significantly cheaper to hold. Over long periods, lower fees can improve net returns, as more of your investment stays invested rather than being deducted for costs. This cost difference is a key factor when comparing similar sector ETFs.

How do the net assets of IYG and XLF compare?

Net assets reflect the total market value of all the holdings within an ETF. XLF (stock_2) has $52.9 billion in net assets, making it much larger than IYG (stock_1), which has $2.2 billion. Generally, larger funds offer greater liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads, which can make trading easier and potentially less costly for investors during normal market conditions.

What do the top holdings tell us about these funds?

Both IYG (stock_1) and XLF (stock_2) hold major US financial firms. Their top ten holdings include Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Visa (V), and Mastercard (MA). While the specific weights differ slightly, the overlap indicates that both funds provide similar exposure to the broad US financial sector, focusing on large, established companies rather than niche or small-cap stocks.

How does dividend yield differ between IYG and XLF?

Dividend yield measures the annual income paid by a fund relative to its price. Currently, XLF (stock_2) offers a yield of 1.49%, whereas IYG (stock_1) offers 1.09%. A higher yield means more cash flow for investors who rely on distributions. However, yield alone does not determine total return; capital gains or losses also play a significant role in the overall performance of an ETF.

Why might an investor choose XLF over IYG?

Investors often select XLF (stock_2) due to its lower expense ratio of 0.08% and higher dividend yield of 1.49%. The fund's larger asset base of $52.9 billion typically provides superior liquidity. These factors can reduce costs and improve trading efficiency. However, choice depends on individual preferences regarding income, costs, and specific index tracking, so one should consider these attributes carefully.

Is there any reason to consider IYG despite higher fees?

IYG (stock_1) provides diversified exposure to US financial services with an inception date in June 2000. While its 0.37% expense ratio is higher, it still tracks the same general sector. Some investors might prefer it for specific brokerage platform availability or if they believe slight differences in holding weights suit their portfolio better. However, generally, lower-cost alternatives exist.

How do these ETFs react to financial sector performance?

Both IYG (stock_1) and XLF (stock_2) are tied to the health of the US financial sector. Their performance is influenced by interest rates, regulatory changes, and economic cycles affecting banks and insurance firms. Since they hold similar top companies like JPM and BRK.B, they will likely move in similar directions during market shifts, though tracking differences may cause minor variations in returns.

What impact do interest rates have on these funds?

Financial sector ETFs like IYG (stock_1) and XLF (stock_2) are sensitive to interest rates. Banks often benefit from higher rates through increased net interest margins, while insurance and asset managers may face challenges. Investors should monitor macroeconomic trends, as central bank policies directly influence the profitability of the large-cap financial firms that dominate the holdings of both these exchange-traded funds.

What is the trading liquidity like for IYG and XLF?

Liquidity refers to how easily you can buy or sell shares without affecting the price. XLF (stock_2), with $52.9 billion in assets, typically offers high liquidity and tighter spreads. IYG (stock_1), with $2.2 billion, is less liquid. For frequent traders, XLF’s higher volume is advantageous. Buy-and-hold investors may care less about daily liquidity but should still be aware of spread costs during entry and exit.

How should beginners interpret the inception dates of these ETFs?

The inception date shows how long a fund has been in operation. XLF (stock_2) launched in December 1998, and IYG (stock_1) in June 2000. Both have long track records, spanning multiple market cycles. This history allows investors to review performance data over significant periods, helping to assess how these funds have handled various economic conditions, though past performance does not guarantee future results.

What disclaimer should readers keep in mind regarding this comparison?

This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. ETF characteristics such as expense ratios, assets, and yields can change. Investors should conduct their own research and consider their personal financial situation and risk tolerance before making investment decisions. Consulting a qualified financial professional is recommended to ensure that any investment strategy aligns with individual long-term goals and needs.

IYG vs XLF

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) with Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. IYG has a 0.37% expense ratio and $2.2 billion net assets; XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio and $52.9 billion net assets. Both hold BRK.B, JPM, V and other leading financial firms. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IYG

Metric

XLF

0.37%

Expense Ratio

0.08%

1.09%

Dividend Yield

1.49%

$2.16B

Net Assets

$52.86B

101

Holdings

Jun 12, 2000

Inception Date

Dec 16, 1998

–

Index Tracked

–

Financial

Fund Category

Financial

XLF costs about $29.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	IYG	XLF
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc.	13.38%	11.86%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	13.10%	11.87%
VVisa Inc.	8.84%	8.00%
MAMastercard Incorporated	6.44%	5.82%
BACBank of America Corporation	5.29%	4.78%
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	3.86%	3.54%
WFCWells Fargo & Company	3.67%	3.32%
MSMorgan Stanley	3.41%	3.12%
CCitigroup Inc.	3.11%	2.87%
SCHWThe Charles Schwab Corporation	2.41%	2.20%

Discover More Comparisons

KBWB vs XLF

Compare KBWB and XLF ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.35% versus 0.08%, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings and index tracking details for informed study.

FNCL vs XLF

Compare FNCL and XLF. Both have 0.08% expense ratios. Review net assets, dividend yields, top holdings, and tracking differences for these ETFs.

KBE vs XLF

Compare KBE and XLF ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.35% and 0.08%, yields of 2.23% and 1.49%, and holdings. Educational data, not financial advice.

Investment Analysis

IYG

Pros

The fund provides exposure to diversified US financial services companies and has been in operation since June 2000.
The fund's asset base of $2.2 billion provides some scale and investor interest, though smaller than many mainstream alternatives.
Top holdings include a mix of large-cap financial companies and firms in asset management, payments and insurance.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.37 percent is relatively high for a broad large-cap financial sector fund.
The dividend yield of 1.09 percent is lower than that of the competing XLF fund at 1.49 percent.
The net assets of $2.2 billion are substantially smaller than XLF's $52.9 billion, suggesting a more limited investor base.

XLF

Pros

The expense ratio of 0.08 percent is a significant cost advantage over the competing IYG fund at 0.37 percent.
The large net assets of $52.9 billion indicate strong liquidity and broad investor adoption.
The dividend yield of 1.49 percent is higher than the competing IYG fund's 1.09 percent yield.

Considerations

The fund's top holdings are heavily weighted towards large-cap US financial companies, limiting broader sector diversification.
Like its competitor, the fund tracks the broad financial sector, meaning its performance is tied to this single industry's economic cycle.
With such a large asset base, even small market movements can potentially lead to wider bid-ask spreads during periods of high volatility.

About IYG and XLF

IYG (IYG)

The iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) offers investors exposure to a broad spectrum of US-based financial service companies. Launched in June 2000, this fund holds approximately 101 stocks, focusing on sectors such as banking, insurance, investment management, and diversified financial services. With net assets of around USD 2.16 billion, it provides a sizeable and established vehicle for those seeking to participate in the performance of the US financial sector. The fund's expense ratio is 0.37%, which is a key factor in understanding total costs over time. Investors receive a dividend yield of roughly 1.09%, which may fluctuate based on market conditions and company performance. It's important to remember that while financial services are a crucial part of the economy, their values can rise and fall, and returns are never guaranteed.

XLF (XLF)

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is an exchange-traded fund that aims to track the performance of the financial sector in the United States. With an inception date of December 16, 1998, and net assets of USD 52.86 billion, XLF provides investors with broad exposure to the financial industry, which includes banks, insurers, and other financial service providers. The fund holds 80 different securities, offering a diversified portfolio within the sector. It has a low expense ratio of 0.08%, which can help investors retain a greater portion of their returns. Additionally, XLF provides a dividend yield of 1.49%, making it an attractive option for income-focused investors. As with any investment, the value of XLF can fluctuate, and returns are not guaranteed, so it is important to consider your risk tolerance and investment goals.

Buy IYG or XLF in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IYG vs XLF

Fund Snapshot