What do IYF and XLF actually invest in, and what do the expense ratios mean for long-term returns?

Both IYF (Dow Jones US Financial iShares) and XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are ETFs focused on the US financial sector, including banks, insurers, and capital markets firms. Expense ratios represent annual management fees as a percentage of assets. IYF charges 0.37% while XLF costs 0.08%. Over 30 years, this 0.29 percentage-point difference compounds significantly - a lower fee allows more of your investment to work for you rather than paying fund managers, potentially boosting long-term returns.

Why do IYF and XLF have different expense ratios when they both track US financial companies?

IYF's 0.37% expense ratio is substantially higher than XLF's 0.08%, despite both targeting US financial sector exposure. IYF provides broader financial exposure across banks, insurers and capital markets firms but lacks the scale of XLF, which has $52.9 billion in assets versus IYF's $4.1 billion. XLF's larger asset base supports better economies of scale in fund operations. The higher cost may offset IYF's broader investment universe for long-term holders.

How do the top holdings of IYF and XLF compare, and what does the overlap mean for diversification?

Both funds share eight major holdings: Berkshire Hathaway Class B (BRK.B), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). IYF's BRK.B at 11.54% and JPM at 11.36% together exceed 22% of assets. XLF adds Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) to its top holdings, with Visa at 8.00%. XLF's top five holdings represent over 36% of total assets, indicating high concentration in both products.

I have $10,000 to invest long-term. How would the fee difference between IYF and XLF compound over 20 years?

The 0.29 percentage-point fee difference between IYF (0.37%) and XLF (0.08%) could significantly impact returns on $10,000 over 20 years. Assuming similar performance, XLF's lower cost allows more of your investment to compound over time. While specific projections depend on market conditions, lower expense ratios generally provide a meaningful long-term advantage in financial sector ETFs. The actual impact varies with investment returns, but the fee differential works in favour of cost-efficient products over extended periods.

I'm investing for retirement in 15 years. What does 'sector concentration' mean for my financial ETF choice?

Sector concentration means both IYF and XLF are heavily invested in just the financial industry. This creates vulnerability if financial markets decline due to regulations or economic downturns. XLF's top five holdings represent more than 36% of total assets, while IYF's BRK.B and JPM together account for over one fifth of its portfolio. For retirement investors, such concentration requires careful consideration alongside broader market diversification, as financial sector-specific risks could significantly impact long-term growth potential.

During a banking crisis or recession, would IYF or XLF protect my money better?

Neither IYF nor XLF offers specific protection during banking crises or recessions, as both provide concentrated exposure to the financial sector. XLF's larger $52.9 billion asset base provides more liquidity than IYF's $4.1 billion, potentially enabling smoother trading during volatility. However, both funds would likely underperform during financial sector downturns. Neither fund is designed as a protective vehicle, though XLF's lower 0.08% expense ratio may provide a slight cost advantage during challenging periods when returns are already under pressure.

If interest rates rise sharply, how would IYF and XLF likely respond given their holdings?

Both IYF and XLF would likely respond similarly to rising interest rates given their shared top holdings of banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America. XLF's portfolio is heavily concentrated in the financial sector, which generally benefits from higher rates through improved net interest margins. IYF's broader US financial exposure including insurers may experience more nuanced impacts. While both could potentially benefit from rising rates, specific performance depends on the magnitude of increases and broader economic context beyond just interest rates.

How are IYF and XLF taxed and how do distributions work when held in a regular brokerage account?

Both IYF and XLF operate similarly in regular brokerage accounts, with distributions typically taxed as qualified dividends or capital gains. IYF offers a 1.47% dividend yield while XLF provides 1.49%, with both making regular distributions that are generally taxed at preferential rates if requirements are met. Neither fund has sector weights data available. In taxable accounts, investors should consider the tax impact of annual distributions and potential capital gains taxes when funds rebalance holdings.

Is there a minimum investment required for IYF and XLF, or can I buy a single share?

You can purchase a single share of either IYF or XLF through your brokerage account, with no fund-imposed minimum investment requirements. XLF's $52.9 billion in assets supports robust secondary market trading and potentially better liquidity, while IYF's smaller $4.1 billion base may affect trading ease. Both are standard ETFs that trade like stocks throughout the trading day, allowing investors to buy fractional shares at many brokerages, making financial sector exposure accessible to investors with various capital amounts.

IYF vs XLF

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare IYF and XLF to assess how each financial sector ETF performs. This page outlines fees, holdings, dividends and market tracking. IYF has a 0.37% expense ratio and $4.1 billion in net assets, while XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio and $52.9 billion in net assets. Both offer similar dividend yields of 1.47% and 1.49% respectively. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IYF

Metric

XLF

0.37%

Expense Ratio

0.08%

1.47%

Dividend Yield

1.49%

$4.11B

Net Assets

$52.86B

147

Holdings

May 22, 2000

Inception Date

Dec 16, 1998

–

Index Tracked

–

Financial

Fund Category

Financial

XLF costs about $29.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	IYF	XLF
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc.	11.54%	11.86%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	11.36%	11.87%
BACBank of America Corporation	4.24%	4.78%
WFCWells Fargo & Company	3.81%	3.32%
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	3.74%	3.54%
MSMorgan Stanley	3.53%	3.12%
CCitigroup Inc.	3.43%	2.87%
SCHWThe Charles Schwab Corporation	2.68%	2.20%

Discover More Comparisons

IYF vs IYG

Compare IYF and IYG financial ETFs. Analyse the identical 0.37 percent expense ratio, differing holdings, dividend yields of 1.47 versus 1.09 percent, and fund.

IYF vs VFH

Compare IYF and VFH ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.37% vs 0.09%, dividend yields, holdings, and fund size to evaluate financial sector options neutrally.

KBWB vs XLF

Compare KBWB and XLF ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.35% versus 0.08%, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings and index tracking details for informed study.

Investment Analysis

IYF

Pros

High liquidity is often available in US financial ETFs although IYF specific bid ask spreads were not provided in the source data.
IYF provides diversified US financial exposure across banks insurers and capital markets firms with top holdings including BRK B and JPM.
IYF’s 0.37% expense ratio may be offset by its ability to target a broader US financial universe than sector specific products.

Considerations

IYF's $4.1 billion asset base is considerably smaller than the $52.9 billion base of the larger financial sector peer.
IYF's 0.37% expense ratio is substantially higher than the lower cost alternatives for comparable US financial sector exposure.
Concentration is notable as BRK B and JPM together account for more than one fifth of IYF’s portfolio value.

XLF

Pros

XLF’s $52.9 billion in net assets supports robust secondary market trading and potential economies of scale in fund operations.
XLF’s 0.08% expense ratio is materially lower than many competitors providing significant cost efficiency for long term investors.
XLF provides large scale financial sector exposure anchored by high quality names such as JPM BRK B V and MA.

Considerations

XLF’s portfolio is heavily concentrated in the financial sector leaving investors exposed to industry specific downturns.
Sector concentration in XLF is pronounced with the top five holdings representing more than 36% of total assets.
Index methodology for XLF is not available in the supplied data which may complicate performance attribution analysis.

Related Market Insights

Beyond 46,000: Investing in a Lower Rate Environment

Explore investment opportunities in rate-sensitive sectors as the Dow surpasses 46,000. Discover how lower interest rates benefit tech, consumer discretionary & finance. Invest with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

12 September 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Beyond 46,000: Investing in a Lower Rate Environment

Explore investment opportunities in rate-sensitive sectors as the Dow surpasses 46,000. Discover how lower interest rates benefit tech, consumer discretionary & finance. Invest with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

12 September 2025

Read Insight

About IYF and XLF

IYF (IYF)

IYF is an exchange-traded fund from iShares that aims to track the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, providing investors with broad exposure to US financial-sector companies such as banks, insurance firms, asset managers and diversified financial services. As a sector ETF, it offers concentrated exposure to financials rather than a diversified, all-market product — useful for investors who wish to express a view on banking and insurance performance or to add sector tilt within a broader portfolio. Key considerations include sensitivity to interest-rate moves, economic cycles and regulatory developments, which can drive volatility. IYF typically distributes dividends from constituent companies, and its liquidity and trading costs matter for implementation. Investors should check the fund’s prospectus, expense ratio and holdings before investing. This information is educational and not personal advice; sector-focused ETFs can magnify both gains and losses and may not suit all investors.

XLF (XLF)

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is an exchange-traded fund that aims to track the performance of the financial sector in the United States. With an inception date of December 16, 1998, and net assets of USD 52.86 billion, XLF provides investors with broad exposure to the financial industry, which includes banks, insurers, and other financial service providers. The fund holds 80 different securities, offering a diversified portfolio within the sector. It has a low expense ratio of 0.08%, which can help investors retain a greater portion of their returns. Additionally, XLF provides a dividend yield of 1.49%, making it an attractive option for income-focused investors. As with any investment, the value of XLF can fluctuate, and returns are not guaranteed, so it is important to consider your risk tolerance and investment goals.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Investing Post-46,000: Which Assets May Outperform?

The Dow's historic close above 46,000 was fueled by anticipation of Federal Reserve rate cuts, signaling strong investor confidence. This creates an investment opportunity in sectors that are poised to benefit from a lower interest rate environment.

Published: 12 September 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Investing Post-46,000: Which Assets May Outperform?

Published: 12 September 2025

Explore Basket

Buy IYF or XLF in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IYF vs XLF

Fund Snapshot