What does it mean when both ETFs have an unavailable index tracked?

When an index tracked is listed as 'not available', the specific benchmark methodology is not publicly detailed in this data set. This does not necessarily mean the ETF lacks transparency, but rather that the provided information does not specify the exact rules. Investors often rely on the fund name and category to understand potential exposure. Without the specific index rules, it is harder to predict exactly how the fund will behave compared to a standard benchmark. This limitation applies equally to both IVW and VUG in this context.

How does an expense ratio affect the net return of an ETF?

The expense ratio represents the annual operating cost of an ETF, deducted from its assets. A lower expense ratio means less drag on potential returns. For example, IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, while VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio. This 0.15 percentage point difference might seem small, but over many years, it can compound. Investors generally prefer lower costs because they retain more of the fund's gross performance. However, other factors like tracking error and tax efficiency also play crucial roles in the final net outcome.

What is single-stock concentration risk in these growth funds?

Single-stock concentration risk occurs when a significant portion of a fund's value is tied to one company. In IVW, NVDA makes up 14.80% of the portfolio. In VUG, NVDA and AAPL together account for over 26%. If one of these major holdings performs poorly, it can disproportionately impact the fund's overall value. While this concentration can boost returns if those stocks rise, it increases volatility compared to a more evenly distributed portfolio. Investors should consider how comfortable they are with this level of dependency on a few tech giants.

Which fund has a longer operating history and what does that imply?

IVW was established in May 2000, giving it a significantly longer track record compared to VUG, which was established in January 2004. IVW's longer history means it has navigated more market cycles, including the dot-com bubble burst and the 2008 financial crisis. While this demonstrates stability, it does not guarantee future performance. VUG's shorter history is still substantial, but it has not experienced the same breadth of market conditions as IVW. Both funds are well-established, with over two decades of existence for each.

How do the top holdings of IVW and VUG compare?

Both funds share eight of their top ten holdings: NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, and AMZN. The primary difference lies in the weighting and the inclusion of unique names in the top ten. For instance, VUG includes TSLA and LLY in its top ten, which are absent in IVW's top list. Conversely, IVW holds MU and BRK.B, which are not in VUG's top ten. Despite these differences, the core exposure to major technology and communication services firms is very similar between the two.

What is the difference in net assets between IVW and VUG?

VUG commands a massive net asset value of $232.1 billion, whereas IVW holds $77.2 billion in assets. VUG is approximately three times larger than IVW. Larger asset bases often contribute to deeper liquidity, meaning tighter bid-ask spreads for traders. However, IVW's $77.2 billion is still considered robust and liquid enough for most retail investors. The size difference primarily affects the ease of trading large blocks of shares without impacting the market price, but both funds are sufficiently large for typical investor needs.

How do the dividend yields of IVW and VUG compare?

IVW has a dividend yield of 0.34%, while VUG offers a slightly higher yield of 0.37%. Both yields are relatively low, which is typical for large-cap growth funds that prioritise capital appreciation over income. The difference of 0.03 percentage points is marginal and unlikely to be the deciding factor for most investors. When evaluating these funds, it is important to remember that growth stocks often reinvest earnings rather than distributing them as dividends. Total return should be assessed alongside yield, not just yield alone.

Are these funds suitable for a purely growth-oriented portfolio?

Yes, both IVW and VUG are categorized as Large Growth ETFs, making them suitable for growth-oriented investment strategies. They focus on companies with above-average growth prospects, often in the technology sector. However, investors should be aware that this focus can lead to higher volatility during market downturns compared to value or blended strategies. These funds are designed to capture the performance of growth stocks. A purely growth portfolio might lack the defensive characteristics of other styles, so understanding one's risk tolerance for growth assets is essential before allocation.

How does the tech sector dominance in these funds affect market exposure?

Both funds have significant exposure to the technology sector, as evidenced by the heavy weighting of NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL, and AMZN in their top ten holdings. This concentration means that the funds' performance is closely tied to the tech industry's health. If the tech sector experiences a downturn, both ETFs are likely to be impacted. While this provides strong growth potential during tech booms, it reduces sector diversification. Investors seeking broad US equity exposure might need to pair these with other ETFs to mitigate sector-specific risks.

Can I switch between IVW and VUG without tax implications?

Switching between ETFs in a taxable brokerage account may trigger capital gains taxes if the sale results in a profit. This is a tax consideration, not an ETF-specific feature, but it applies to any trade between funds like IVW and VUG. If held in a tax-advantaged account like an IRA, no immediate tax consequences arise from selling. The cost of switching also includes any bid-ask spread and potential trading commissions, though many brokers offer commission-free trading. Investors should weigh the 0.15% expense ratio difference against any immediate transaction costs.

What information is missing when sector weights are not available?

When sector weights are listed as 'not available', investors cannot precisely calculate the percentage exposure to specific industries such as Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, or Communication Services. This limits the ability to perform detailed asset allocation checks or compare the exact sector tilt against a benchmark. However, by analysing the top holdings, one can infer a heavy technology and communication services bias. For precise sector data, consulting the issuer's official website or fact sheet is recommended, as the provided comparison data lacks this specific detail.

Why is it important to check if an index is available before investing?

Knowing the index tracked helps investors understand the specific criteria used to select holdings. Without this information, it is difficult to predict how the fund will react to market changes or how it differs from similar funds. For example, a 'S&P 500 Growth' label implies a certain methodology, but the specific index rules determine inclusion and weighting. Checking this ensures that the fund aligns with your broader investment strategy. Since both IVW and VUG have 'not available' index data in this context, further independent research is prudent.

IVW vs VUG

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Vanguard US Growth ETF (VUG) side by side. This page examines fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks the large growth market. Note the 0.18% expense ratio for IVW and 0.03% for VUG. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IVW

Metric

VUG

0.18%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

0.34%

Dividend Yield

0.37%

$77.16B

Net Assets

$232.11B

155

Holdings

151

May 22, 2000

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Growth

Fund Category

Large Growth

VUG costs about $15.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	IVW	VUG
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	14.80%	13.62%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	10.09%	10.12%
AAPLApple Inc.	6.75%	12.49%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	5.64%	5.34%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	4.68%	4.10%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	4.50%	4.21%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	4.04%	3.39%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	3.63%	4.76%

Discover More Comparisons

IVW vs VOOG

Compare IVW and VOOG on expense ratios, net assets, dividends, and top holdings. Review factual data for these Large Growth ETFs to inform further research.

IVW vs QQQ

Compare IVW vs QQQ on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking methods. Both Large Growth funds share a 0.18% expense ratio but differ in size and tech exposure.

IVW vs SPMO

Compare IVW and SPMO ETFs on fees, yields, and holdings. IVW has a 0.18% ratio and 0.34% yield; SPMO has 0.13% and 0.72%. Review momentum strategies.

Investment Analysis

IVW

Pros

Fund A offers a very large asset base of $77.2 billion, which can provide robust liquidity for investors.
It has a long operating history since its inception in May 2000, demonstrating stability through various market cycles.
The fund's dividend yield is 0.34%, providing a small income stream alongside capital appreciation potential.

Considerations

With an expense ratio of 0.18%, the fund carries a higher cost compared to many index-tracking alternatives.
Its top holding, NVDA, constitutes 14.80% of the portfolio, creating significant single-stock concentration risk.
The index tracked by the fund is not available, limiting transparency regarding its specific methodology.

VUG

Pros

The extremely low expense ratio of 0.03% makes this fund highly cost-efficient for long-term holding.
It commands a massive net asset value of $232.1 billion, ensuring deep liquidity and ease of trading.
A slight edge in yield at 0.37% offers marginally better income distribution compared to its peer.

Considerations

Concentration in top holdings is pronounced, with NVDA and AAPL accounting for 13.62% and 12.49% respectively.
The specific index tracked is not available, which hinders precise benchmark comparison and methodology analysis.
Despite its size, the fund's inception in January 2004 means it has a shorter track record than some older peers.

About IVW and VUG

IVW (IVW)

The iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF offers investors exposure to a curated selection of US large-cap companies that exhibit strong growth characteristics. Designed for those seeking capital appreciation, this fund focuses on businesses expected to achieve above-average revenue and earnings growth. With an inception date of May 22, 2000, it has a long history of tracking growth-oriented market segments. The fund holds approximately 155 assets, maintaining a relatively concentrated portfolio compared to broader market indices. Its expense ratio stands at 0.18%, providing a cost-effective way to access this specific factor. While it currently offers a modest dividend yield of 0.34%, the primary objective remains growth rather than income. Investors should note that while net assets are substantial at USD 77.16 billion, the value of these growth stocks can fluctuate significantly, and past performance does not guarantee future returns.

VUG (VUG)

This exchange-traded fund aims to track the performance of large-capitalisation U.S. companies classified as growth stocks. It generally holds shares of businesses expected to expand faster than the broader market, often focusing on sectors like information technology and consumer discretionary. The fund maintains a low expense ratio, which helps preserve investor returns over time. While growth stocks can offer significant capital appreciation during favourable economic conditions, they may also experience higher volatility and sharper declines when market sentiment shifts or interest rates rise. With over 150 holdings, the fund provides diversified exposure to leading U.S. growth firms. Investors should note that past performance is not indicative of future results, and values can go down as well as up. The fund pays a modest dividend yield, but its primary objective remains capital growth rather than income generation. It is suitable for those seeking long-term exposure to the growth segment of the U.S. equity market.

Buy IVW or VUG in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IVW vs VUG

Fund Snapshot