What is the primary difference in the investment focus between IGV and QQQM?

IGV focuses on the technology software sector, holding companies like Palo Alto Networks and Palantir. QQQM targets large growth stocks within the NASDAQ 100, including broader tech giants like Nvidia and Apple. While both include Microsoft, IGV is niche, QQQM is diversified across top large-cap growth firms. This distinction affects risk and return profiles significantly for investors.

How do expense ratios differ between IGV and QQQM?

IGV has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while QQQM charges 0.15%. The difference is 0.23 percentage points annually. Although this seems small, it compounds over time, affecting net returns. QQQM’s lower fee reflects its broader market-cap focus, whereas IGV’s higher fee relates to sector-specific management. Investors should consider how these costs impact long-term growth potential.

What does sector concentration mean for ETFs like IGV and QQQM?

IGV is heavily concentrated in tech software, with top holdings like Palo Alto Networks and Palantir comprising significant weights. QQQM, while tech-heavy, includes diversified large growth stocks such as Amazon and Meta. Neither fund discloses sector weights, limiting transparency. Concentration increases vulnerability to sector-specific downturns, whereas broader exposure like QQQM may mitigate some risks despite high tech weighting.

Which ETF has a longer track record, IGV or QQQM?

IGV has an inception date of July 10, 2001, providing over two decades of historical data. QQQM, launched on October 13, 2020, has a much shorter track record. While QQQM offers lower fees, its limited history may concern investors seeking proven performance. IGV’s longevity allows for a clearer assessment of its strategy during various market cycles, despite its narrower focus.

How do top holdings overlap between IGV and QQQM?

Microsoft is the only shared top-10 holding, appearing in both funds. IGV’s top positions include Palo Alto Networks and Palantir, emphasising software. QQQM holds Nvidia and Apple, reflecting broader large growth tech. This limited overlap suggests distinct exposures. Investors seeking similar holdings may need to combine funds, as each ETF targets different segments within the technology landscape, affecting diversification strategies.

Why might an investor choose IGV over QQQM despite higher fees?

An investor might select IGV for targeted exposure to the technology software sector, believing in growth of firms like Palo Alto Networks and Palantir. QQQM offers broader large growth tech but includes non-software firms. Those seeking pure-play software exposure accept higher fees for concentrated potential upside. This strategy suits investors confident in sector-specific performance rather than diversified market growth.

How do dividend yields compare for IGV and QQQM?

IGV has a dividend yield of 0.02%, while QQQM yields 0.43%. QQQM’s higher yield reflects holdings like Microsoft and Apple, which distribute dividends. IGV’s minimal yield stems from growth-focused software firms retaining earnings. Dividends are secondary to capital appreciation in such ETFs, but QQQM’s yield offers modest income, contrasting IGV’s near-zero distribution focus.

What role do top holdings play in the performance of IGV and QQQM?

Top holdings significantly influence ETF performance. IGV’s heavy weighting in Palo Alto Networks and Palantir ties its success to software sector trends. QQQM’s exposure to Nvidia and Apple links it to broader tech growth and consumer demand. Since both include Microsoft, they share some market sensitivity. Understanding these holdings helps gauge potential returns and risks tied to specific company performance.

Are there alternatives if sector weights are not available for IGV and QQQM?

Without disclosed sector weights, investors may rely on top holdings to infer concentration. For IGV, high weights in software firms indicate sector-specific focus. QQQM’s broader holdings suggest diversified large growth exposure. Those requiring precise allocation data might consider other ETFs with transparent reporting. However, using available figures, investors can still assess relative focus and risk profiles based on holding compositions and expense structures.

How does net asset size impact the choice between IGV and QQQM?

QQQM has net assets of $105.7 billion, indicating substantial liquidity and scale. IGV, with $14.1 billion, is smaller, which may result in less trading volume. Larger size often means tighter bid-ask spreads. While both are accessible, QQQM’s size supports easier entry and exit, whereas IGV’s smaller scale reflects its niche focus but might pose liquidity considerations for large transactions.

IGV vs QQQM

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) to examine fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. IGV charges 0.38% with $14.1 billion net assets, while QQQM charges 0.15% with $105.7 billion. MSFT appears in both top-ten holdings. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IGV

Metric

QQQM

0.38%

Expense Ratio

0.15%

0.02%

Dividend Yield

0.43%

$14.09B

Net Assets

$105.70B

109

Holdings

106

Jul 10, 2001

Inception Date

Oct 13, 2020

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Large Growth

QQQM costs about $23.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	IGV	QQQM
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	8.35%	5.89%

Discover More Comparisons

IGV vs SMH

Compare IGV and SMH ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.38% and 0.35%, distinct top holdings like PANW and NVDA, dividend yields, and technology sub-sector focus.

IGV vs VOO

IGV vs VOO: 0.38% vs 0.03% fees, 0.02% vs 1.03% yields. Compare software exposure, large-cap diversification, and top holdings including MSFT.

IGV vs XLK

Compare IGV and XLK. Analyse expense ratios of 0.38% vs 0.08%, net assets, dividend yields, and top holdings to understand their market tracking differences.

Investment Analysis

IGV

Pros

Low total assets of £14.1 billion relative to peers could indicate niche focus.
Expense ratio of 0.38% is reasonable for sector-specific ETF.
Top holdings like PANW and PLTR offer high growth potential.

Considerations

Index tracked is not available, limiting transparency.
Sector weights not disclosed, hindering diversification assessment.
Dividend yield of 0.02% provides minimal income.

QQQM

Pros

Expense ratio of 0.15% offers cost efficiency.
Net assets of £105.7 billion indicate scale and liquidity.
Invests in top holdings like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

Considerations

Index tracked not available, reducing transparency.
Sector weights not disclosed, complicating risk assessment.
Relatively recent inception date of 2020 may limit track record.

About IGV and QQQM

IGV (IGV)

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) offers investors exposure to a broad basket of companies within the software and information technology services sectors. With a market capitalisation focus on large, mid, and small-cap software firms, it aims to reflect the performance of the expanded tech software industry. The fund holds approximately 109 positions, providing diversification within the sector while concentrating on businesses involved in developing, maintaining, and supporting software applications. Investors should note that the fund’s value can fluctuate significantly due to its focus on a single sector. While it provides an efficient way to access the tech-software theme, returns are not guaranteed, and market conditions can impact performance. The expense ratio is 0.38%, and it currently reports a very low dividend yield.

QQQM (QQQM)

The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) aims to track the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index, offering investors exposure to a concentrated basket of large-cap growth companies. As a cost-effective version of the well-known Nasdaq exposure, it typically features lower fees than its larger sibling, making it an attractive option for buy-and-hold strategies. The fund holds approximately 106 companies, heavily weighted towards the technology sector, but also including consumer services, health care, and industrials. With net assets exceeding $105 billion, it provides deep liquidity. While historically associated with strong growth during bullish market periods, investors should remember that the underlying companies are subject to market volatility. Values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed. It suits those seeking broad exposure to major US tech and growth innovators, rather than personalised financial advice.

Buy IGV or QQQM in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IGV vs QQQM

Fund Snapshot