What does an expense ratio indicate when comparing these two emerging market ETFs?

An expense ratio is the annual fee charged by a fund to manage its assets. For IEMG, it is 0.09%, while for VWO, it is 0.06%. Although the difference of 0.03 percentage points seems small, lower fees can improve net returns over long periods. Investors should view the expense ratio as a key cost metric, but also consider other factors like tracking and liquidity when evaluating these ETFs.

What is dividend yield and how does it apply to IEMG and VWO?

Dividend yield is the annual dividend payment divided by the fund's current price. IEMG offers a 2.15% yield, whereas VWO provides 1.99%. These figures suggest that IEMG currently distributes more income relative to its price. However, yields change with market conditions and dividend policies, so this metric should be viewed as a snapshot rather than a guaranteed future income stream.

How do the inception dates of IEMG and VWO affect their historical performance data?

IEMG was launched on 18 October 2012, while VWO started on 4 March 2005. This gives VWO a significantly longer track record, offering more data for assessing how it handled various market cycles. IEMG's shorter history means less historical context, though it still provides nearly a decade of performance. Investors often weigh the benefit of longer historical data against other fund features.

Why do IEMG and VWO have no shared top-10 holdings despite being similar ETFs?

IEMG's top holdings data is not available. VWO lists PDD and AU among its top holdings. The absence of shared top-10 holdings suggests that these funds may use different indices or methodologies. Even within the same category, index selection can lead to distinct portfolios. This highlights that 'Emerging Markets' is not a single, monolithic exposure but varies by specific index tracked.

What does net asset size mean for these emerging market ETFs?

Net assets reflect the total market value of the fund's holdings. IEMG has $161.8 billion, and VWO has $126.6 billion. Both sizes indicate substantial liquidity and market depth. Larger asset bases can help reduce trading costs and improve the fund's ability to handle large inflows or outflows. However, size alone does not guarantee performance; it primarily speaks to the fund's popularity and trading infrastructure.

How do the expense ratios of IEMG and VWO compare for low-cost investing?

When evaluating costs, VWO's 0.06% expense ratio is lower than IEMG's 0.09%. Over time, this 0.03 percentage point difference can compound, potentially leading to a noticeable gap in net asset value growth. While IEMG remains competitive, investors seeking the absolute lowest fee within this category might view VWO as the more cost-efficient option, all else being equal.

What index do these funds track and how does that influence their holdings?

IEMG tracks the Core MSCI Emerging Markets Index, and VWO tracks the FTSE Emerging Markets Index. Different index providers use unique methodologies for selecting and weighting countries and companies. This results in variations in exposure to specific emerging market nations and stocks. Consequently, even though both are emerging market ETFs, their actual holdings and performance drivers may differ significantly due to these index distinctions.

Which emerging market ETF is better for generating current income?

For investors focused on current income, IEMG's 2.15% dividend yield is higher than VWO's 1.99%. This difference makes IEMG more suitable for those prioritising yield in their portfolio. However, yield is just one factor; investors must also consider the total cost of ownership and the fund's volatility. Neither fund is strictly 'better', but they appeal to different primary objectives, such as income versus cost efficiency.

Where can I find reliable financial information to make informed decisions?

While this comparison highlights key data points like expense ratios and yields, investing decisions require more than just fee comparisons. Investors should consult comprehensive financial advice and use reputable tools to analyse market trends and personal risk tolerance. For detailed educational resources and analysis, platforms like TradingView offer insights and communities that can support your learning journey. Always conduct thorough research before making investment decisions.

Is there any guarantee that these emerging markets funds will perform well?

No, there are no guarantees. Past performance, such as VWO's longer track record, does not predict future results. Emerging markets are inherently volatile. The educational content provided here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should assess their own risk tolerance and seek independent professional advice before investing in IEMG, VWO, or any other security.

IEMG vs VWO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Core MSCI Emerging Markets iShares (IEMG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) to evaluate fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio and 2.15% yield, while VWO has a 0.06% expense ratio and 1.99% yield. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare Core MSCI Emerging Markets iShares (IEMG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) to evaluate fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio and 2.15% yiel...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IEMG

Metric

VWO

0.09%

Expense Ratio

0.06%

2.15%

Dividend Yield

1.99%

$161.78B

Net Assets

$126.59B

2,925

Holdings

5,061

Oct 18, 2012

Inception Date

Mar 4, 2005

–

Index Tracked

–

Diversified Emerging Mkts

Fund Category

Diversified Emerging Mkts

VWO costs about $3.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

IEMG vs SCHE

Compare IEMG and SCHE ETFs on fees, dividends, and holdings. IEMG charges 0.09% yield 2.15%; SCHE charges 0.06% yield 2.54%. See which fits research.

IEMG vs SPEM

Compare IEMG and SPEM on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. IEMG has 0.09% expenses, SPEM 0.07%. Check net assets and yields before deciding.

IEMG vs VXUS

IEMG vs VXUS: IEMG holds 2,915 emerging market stocks at 0.09%; VXUS holds 8,860 non-US stocks at 0.05%. Both own Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung and Tencent.

Investment Analysis

IEMG

Pros

Assets under management of $161.8 billion indicate exceptional liquidity and trading scale.
Inception in October 2012 provides a longer track record than many newer alternatives.
A 2.15 per cent yield offers a higher income profile than the comparison fund.

Considerations

An expense ratio of 0.09 per cent is higher than the cheaper competitor.
Top holdings data is not available, limiting transparency for concentration analysis.
Sector weights are not available, preventing precise assessment of industry exposure.

VWO

Pros

An expense ratio of 0.06 per cent represents a lower total cost of ownership.
Inception in March 2005 establishes a significantly longer historical performance record.
Net assets of $126.6 billion ensure robust liquidity and market depth for investors.

Considerations

A 1.99 per cent yield provides slightly lower income than the comparison fund.
Sector weights are not available, hindering detailed analysis of specific industry risks.
Top holdings data is limited, offering less visibility into precise single-stock exposure.

Related Market Insights

Banking On Emerging Market Wealth: The Financial Services Goldmine

Discover the goldmine in emerging market financial services. Invest in global institutions benefiting from expanding wealth & sophisticated banking demand in high-growth economies. Explore Nemes on Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

31 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Banking On Emerging Market Wealth: The Financial Services Goldmine

Discover the goldmine in emerging market financial services. Invest in global institutions benefiting from expanding wealth & sophisticated banking demand in high-growth economies. Explore Nemes on Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

31 July 2025

Read Insight

About IEMG and VWO

IEMG (IEMG)

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) provides broad exposure to equities in emerging-market countries by tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It includes large-, mid- and small-cap companies across a wide range of economies, offering diversified access to fast-growing regions that can complement developed-market holdings. As an ETF, IEMG trades like a stock on exchanges, with intraday liquidity and market pricing. Investors should weigh potential benefits—diversification and emerging-market growth prospects—against distinct risks: higher volatility, political and currency risk, and regional liquidity differences. Performance can fluctuate materially and past performance is no guarantee of future returns. This information is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute personal investment advice; suitability depends on individual circumstances and investors should consult a financial adviser if unsure.

VWO (VWO)

The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF provides investors with broad exposure to publicly traded companies in emerging market countries. As a diversified fund, it aims to track the performance of the emerging markets equity asset class, encompassing thousands of holdings across various sectors and geographies. With a low expense ratio of 0.06%, it offers a cost-efficient way to gain access to these dynamic economies. The fund, established in March 2005, holds net assets of approximately USD 126.59 billion. Investors should be aware that emerging market investments can be more volatile than developed markets, with returns not guaranteed and values subject to rise and fall. It is suitable for those seeking diversification and long-term growth potential within emerging economies.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Banking On Emerging Market Wealth

Standard Chartered's impressive profit growth, driven by its wealth management success in emerging markets, highlights a significant investment opportunity. This theme focuses on other global financial institutions that are similarly positioned to capitalize on the expanding wealth and demand for sophisticated banking services in high-growth economies.

Published: 31 July 2025

Explore Basket