What are the expense ratios for the funds?

IDRV has an expense ratio of 0.47%, and KARS has an expense ratio of 0.69%. These represent the annual management fees charged by each fund. IDRV's fee is lower by 0.22 percentage points, resulting in lower ongoing costs.

What are the net assets for the funds?

IDRV has net assets of $288 million, while KARS has net assets of $75 million. IDRV has a larger asset base, resulting in greater liquidity and trading depth for investors.

What are the dividend yields?

IDRV has a dividend yield of 1.84%, and KARS has a dividend yield of 0.19%. IDRV offers enhanced income generation potential compared to the negligible income of KARS.

What is the inception date for each fund?

IDRV's inception date is Apr 16, 2019, and KARS' inception date is Jan 18, 2018. KARS provides a longer operational history for performance assessment.

What is the sector category for each fund?

Both IDRV and KARS fall under the Industrials category. The sector weight breakdowns are not available for either fund, preventing detailed industry exposure analysis.

What is the top holding weight for each fund?

IDRV's top holding is TSLA at 4.50%, while KARS' top holding is TSLA at 4.37%. IDRV indicates potential concentration risk with its higher top holding weight.

Which index does each fund track?

The index tracked is not available for either IDRV or KARS. This limits methodology transparency for investors, requiring further research into the underlying strategies.

Which fund has a smaller net asset value?

KARS has net assets of $75 million compared to IDRV's $288 million. This smaller net asset value may result in wider bid-ask spreads for investors.

What is the top holding concentration for IDRV?

IDRV has a top holding weight of 4.50% for TSLA, indicating potential concentration risk. This is a higher weight than KARS' top holding weight of 4.37% for TSLA.

Which fund offers higher liquidity?

IDRV offers higher liquidity due to its larger net assets of $288 million compared to KARS' $75 million. This results in greater trading depth and narrower bid-ask spreads.

Which fund has a lower expense ratio?

IDRV has a lower expense ratio of 0.47% compared to KARS' 0.69%. This lower expense ratio creates less drag on net returns over time.

IDRV vs KARS

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech (IDRV) with Kraneshares Electric Vehicle (KARS). Explore expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, inception dates and top holdings. Assess how each fund tracks the electric vehicle and autonomous technology markets. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech (IDRV) with Kraneshares Electric Vehicle (KARS). Explore expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, inception dates and top holdings. Assess how each fund tr...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IDRV

Metric

KARS

0.47%

Expense Ratio

0.69%

1.84%

Dividend Yield

0.19%

$287.54M

Net Assets

$75.12M

90

Holdings

87

Apr 16, 2019

Inception Date

Jan 18, 2018

–

Index Tracked

–

Industrials

Fund Category

Industrials

IDRV costs about $22.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	IDRV	KARS
TSLATesla, Inc.	4.50%	4.37%
RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.	4.43%	2.59%
ALBAlbemarle Corporation	3.45%	2.27%
AURAurora Innovation, Inc.	3.23%	2.78%

Investment Analysis

IDRV

Pros

Lower annual management fee of 0.47 percent compared to the alternative vehicle.
Larger asset base of 288 million supports greater liquidity and trading depth.
Higher dividend yield of 1.84 percent offers enhanced income generation potential.

Considerations

Track index data is not available which limits methodology transparency for investors.
Top holding weight of 4.50 percent indicates potential concentration risk within the fund.
Sector weight breakdowns are not available preventing detailed industry exposure analysis.

KARS

Pros

Thematic exposure to electric vehicles aligns with long-term industrial transformation trends.
Inception date January 2018 provides a longer operational history for performance assessment.
Issuer details not available but fund category remains clearly defined as industrials.

Considerations

Higher expense ratio of 0.69 percent creates a greater drag on net returns.
Smaller net assets of 75 million may result in wider bid-ask spreads.
Dividend yield of 0.19 percent offers negligible income for yield-focused investors.

Related Market Insights

Waymo's London Launch: The Autonomous Driving Revolution Crosses the Atlantic

Waymo launches robotaxis in London, signalling global autonomous vehicle growth. Discover investment opportunities in key technology suppliers powering this revolution with Nemo.