IBOTROBO

IBOT vs ROBO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

IBOT vs ROBO compares VanEck Robotics and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETFs on fees, holdings, dividends and market tracking. IBOT charges 0.47% and launched in 2023; ROBO charges 0.95% and launc...

Investment Analysis

IBOT

IBOT

IBOT

Pros

  • The expense ratio is lower at 0.47% compared to the alternative fund.
  • Inception date is recent, potentially reflecting updated robotics investment methodologies.
  • Top holding weights are higher, indicating a more concentrated active management strategy.

Considerations

  • Net assets are significantly smaller at $99 million, which may affect trading liquidity.
  • The fund's dividend yield is marginally lower at 0.31% compared to the competitor.
  • Index tracking information is not available, reducing transparency on the underlying methodology.
ROBO

ROBO

ROBO

Pros

  • Net assets are much larger at $2.0 billion, suggesting better trading liquidity and stability.
  • The fund has a long track record, having launched in October 2013.
  • Dividend yield is slightly higher at 0.36% compared to the alternative fund.

Considerations

  • The expense ratio is considerably higher at 0.95%, increasing the total cost of ownership.
  • Top holdings are more diversified with lower individual weights, potentially diluting concentrated growth.
  • Issuer details are not available, which limits transparency on the fund manager's background.

Buy IBOT or ROBO in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions

IBOT vs ROBO: Fees, Returns and Holdings Compared