How do the expense ratios of HYLB and USHY compare?

HYLB has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while USHY has 0.08%. The difference is 0.03 percentage points. A lower expense ratio means the fund deducts less from its assets for management costs. Over time, even small differences in fees can impact net returns, as investors pay these costs annually. While both funds are relatively low-cost for high-yield bond ETFs, the choice depends on how much the investor values cost efficiency versus other factors such as liquidity or fund size.

What does net asset size indicate about an ETF?

Net assets reflect the total value of holdings owned by the fund and serve as a proxy for its liquidity and investor demand. USHY, with $27.3 billion in net assets, is significantly larger than HYLB, which has $3.5 billion. Larger funds often experience narrower bid-ask spreads and better trading conditions. However, fund size alone doesn’t determine performance or suitability—it's one factor among many including fees, yield, and track record that investors should weigh.

Which fund offers a higher dividend yield?

USHY has a dividend yield of 6.99%, compared to 6.57% for HYLB. The yield represents the annual income generated by the fund’s holdings as a percentage of its price. High-yield bond ETFs distribute income from coupon payments made by underlying corporate bonds. A higher yield may attract income-focused investors, but it should be evaluated alongside credit risk, duration, and overall portfolio objectives, rather than in isolation.

Are the top holdings of HYLB and USHY similar?

According to the data, none of the top ten holdings are shared between HYLB and USHY. This indicates differing portfolio compositions despite both targeting USD high-yield corporate bonds. Variations may arise from index construction methods, security selection criteria, or diversification limits. Lack of overlap suggests that each fund reflects distinct subsets of the high-yield market, potentially leading to different risk-return profiles even within the same asset class.

What kind of investing goals might these funds suit?

Both HYLB and USHY are designed for investors seeking regular income from corporate debt with above-investment-grade risk. They may suit portfolios aiming to balance equity exposure with fixed income, particularly in environments where higher yields are desired. However, due to their credit risk and sensitivity to economic downturns, they are better aligned with medium- to long-term horizons for those who understand default and spread volatility risks.

How do these funds track the high-yield bond market?

Both HYLB and USHY aim to replicate segments of the US dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bond market. However, the specific index tracked by either fund is not available in the data. Typically, such ETFs use physical replication or sampling strategies to mirror an underlying benchmark. The absence of index details limits direct comparison of their methodologies, so investors should consult official fund documents to understand tracking approaches.

Is there a difference in fund inception dates?

Yes. HYLB was launched on 7 December 2016, while USHY began trading on 25 October 2017. This means HYLB has a slightly longer operational history—by less than a year. Track record length can influence perceptions of stability, though both funds have been active for over seven years as of 2024. Investors should consider performance consistency over time, but remember past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

How are dividends distributed from high-yield bond ETFs?

High-yield bond ETFs like HYLB and USHY typically distribute dividends monthly or quarterly, depending on the fund. These payments come from interest earned on the underlying corporate bonds. Investors receive taxable income, which may include both ordinary income and capital gains. Reinvesting distributions can compound returns, while cash payouts provide liquidity. The frequency and amount vary based on bond coupons and fund cash flow management.

What practical considerations should investors keep in mind when comparing these ETFs?

Investors should evaluate not only expense ratios and yields but also fund size, liquidity, tracking methodology, and risk exposure. Although HYLB has a lower fee, USHY's larger asset base may offer better trade execution. Yield differences reflect underlying bond portfolios, not necessarily superior income generation. Since top holdings and indices aren't fully detailed, reviewing prospectuses or issuer websites is essential before making decisions.

Why should I review official documentation before choosing between HYLB and USHY?

Official fund documents provide critical details missing from public summaries, such as precise index tracking methods, full portfolio composition, credit quality breakdown, and risk factors. Information like top holdings and sector weights is not available here, limiting direct comparison. Reviewing these materials ensures a complete understanding of each fund’s strategy, costs, and suitability for your financial objectives and risk tolerance.

HYLB vs USHY

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corp Bond ETF) and USHY (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF). This page reviews fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. Both track high yield corporate bonds, but differ in expense ratios and net assets. Top holdings and sector weights are not available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

HYLB

Metric

USHY

0.05%

Expense Ratio

0.08%

6.57%

Dividend Yield

6.99%

$3.45B

Net Assets

$27.27B

1,283

Holdings

1,900

Dec 7, 2016

Inception Date

Oct 25, 2017

–

Index Tracked

–

High Yield Bond

Fund Category

High Yield Bond

HYLB costs about $3.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SPHY vs USHY

Compare SPHY vs USHY ETFs on fees, dividends, holdings and tracking. This factual overview highlights key metrics for both high yield bond funds.

HYG vs USHY

Compare HYG vs USHY expense ratios, dividend yields, and net assets. This page details high yield bond ETF differences for neutral educational research purposes

Investment Analysis

HYLB

Pros

Expense ratio of 0.05% is lower than the other fund.
Net assets of $3.5 billion provide moderate liquidity.
Inception date of Dec 7, 2016 gives a slightly longer track record.

Considerations

Dividend yield of 6.57% is lower than the other fund.
Issuer information is not available for this fund.
Index tracked information is not available for this fund.

USHY

Pros

Net assets of $27.3 billion indicate significantly higher liquidity.
Dividend yield of 6.99% is higher than the other fund.
Issuer is well-known as iShares, offering established fund management.

Considerations

Expense ratio of 0.08% is higher than the other fund.
Inception date of Oct 25, 2017 is more recent.
Index tracked information is not available for this fund.

About HYLB and USHY

HYLB (HYLB)

The Xtrackers USD High Yield Corp Bond ETF (HYLB) aims to track the performance of a broad spectrum of US corporate high yield bonds. These are debt securities issued by companies that typically pay higher interest rates due to lower credit ratings compared to investment-grade firms. With an expense ratio of just 0.05%, the fund offers a cost-efficient way to access this asset class. As of its latest data, HYLB holds 1,283 individual bonds, providing a diversification effect across various issuers and sectors. Its dividend yield stands at 6.57%, reflecting the income potential of high-yield instruments. Launched in December 2016, the fund has accumulated significant assets, currently netting USD 3.45 billion. While offering potential income, investors should remember that high yield bonds carry higher default risks, and values can fluctuate.

USHY (USHY)

The iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) offers investors exposure to a wide range of US dollar-denominated high yield corporate bonds. With a low expense ratio of 0.08%, this fund aims to provide income through bonds issued by companies considered to have lower credit ratings than investment-grade issuers. Holding approximately 1,900 securities, USHY provides significant diversification across various sectors of the corporate bond market. It has a notable dividend yield of 6.99%, making it potentially attractive for income-focused strategies. However, it's crucial to remember that investments in high yield bonds come with higher risks, including credit and interest rate fluctuations. As with all investments, there is no guarantee of performance, and the value of your investment can go down as well as up. This fund launched on October 25, 2017, and manages substantial assets, reflecting its role within the fixed-income ETF landscape.

Buy HYLB or USHY in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

HYLB vs USHY

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

SPHY vs USHY

HYG vs USHY

Investment Analysis

HYLB

Pros

Considerations

USHY

Pros

Considerations

About HYLB and USHY

Buy HYLB or USHY in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

How do the expense ratios of HYLB and USHY compare?

What does net asset size indicate about an ETF?

Which fund offers a higher dividend yield?

Are the top holdings of HYLB and USHY similar?

What kind of investing goals might these funds suit?

How do these funds track the high-yield bond market?

Is there a difference in fund inception dates?

How are dividends distributed from high-yield bond ETFs?

What practical considerations should investors keep in mind when comparing these ETFs?

Why should I review official documentation before choosing between HYLB and USHY?

Fund Snapshot

About HYLB and USHY

Discover More Comparisons

SPHY vs USHY

HYG vs USHY