What is the primary difference between HYG and LQD in terms of bond credit quality?

HYG is a high yield bond fund, meaning it invests in corporate debt with lower credit ratings and higher default risk but potential for higher income. LQD is an investment grade corporate bond fund, focusing on issuers with stronger credit ratings and lower default risk. The key distinction lies in the credit quality of the underlying bonds, which influences the risk profile and potential return of each fund.

How do the expense ratios of HYG and LQD compare, and why does this matter?

HYG has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while LQD's is significantly lower at 0.14%. This 0.35% difference means LQD deducts less from its assets annually to cover management fees. Over time, a lower expense ratio can help preserve more of the investor's capital and potential returns, making fee comparison a crucial factor when evaluating long-term holding costs of similar funds.

What does the inception date tell us about the track record of these funds?

LQD was launched on 22 July 2002, giving it a longer operational history than HYG, which started on 4 April 2007. A longer track record allows for more extensive historical performance analysis and demonstrates how the fund has weathered various market cycles over time. However, past performance does not guarantee future results, and both dates indicate established products within the corporate bond market.

How do the dividend yields of HYG and LQD differ, and what drives this gap?

HYG offers a dividend yield of 6.02%, whereas LQD provides 4.77%. The higher yield in HYG compensates investors for taking on greater credit risk associated with high-yield bonds. Conversely, LQD's lower yield reflects its investment in safer, investment-grade corporate debt. These yields are indicative of current distributions and may vary as market conditions and interest rates change, affecting the fund's net asset value.

Why is net asset size important for ETFs like HYG and LQD?

LQD manages $27.5 billion in net assets, compared to HYG's $15.0 billion. Larger asset bases generally support higher trading liquidity, leading to tighter bid-ask spreads and lower transaction costs for investors. This scale can also attract more institutional participation, stabilising the fund. Both are considered large, liquid vehicles, but LQD's higher assets under management indicate slightly greater market depth.

Are there any shared top-10 holdings between HYG and LQD?

The provided data indicates there are no shared top-10 holdings between HYG and LQD. This lack of overlap suggests the two funds target distinct segments of the corporate debt market. While both focus on corporate bonds, the specific issuers held in the largest positions differ significantly, reflecting their respective strategies in high-yield versus investment-grade credit spaces.

How does credit quality impact the risk profile of these bond funds?

HYG's classification as a high yield fund implies exposure to issuers with lower credit ratings, resulting in higher default risk but potentially higher income. LQD, as an investment grade fund, holds debt from companies with stronger credit profiles, offering lower default risk. Investors should understand that higher yields often come with increased vulnerability to economic downturns, while investment-grade bonds are generally more resilient.

How do interest rate changes affect these corporate bond funds?

Both HYG and LQD are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, but typically, longer-duration bonds and those with lower yields, like LQD, may experience greater price volatility when rates rise. LQD's cons mention sensitivity to interest rate changes. High yield bonds in HYG are often more influenced by credit spreads and economic conditions rather than just base rates, though rising rates can pressure both asset classes.

What role does sector concentration play in these funds' diversification?

The data states that sector weight information is not available for either fund. Without this detail, it is difficult to assess specific industry concentration risks. Generally, corporate bond funds can be heavily weighted towards sectors like telecommunications, media, or industrials. Investors might seek additional data to understand how diversified these portfolios are across different economic sectors to manage exposure effectively.

What should an investor look for if top holdings data is not available?

When top holdings and sector weights are not available, as noted for both HYG and LQD, investors should examine the fund's prospectus and monthly fact sheets for detailed portfolio composition. Understanding the specific issuers and their credit ratings is vital for assessing risk. Reliance on broad indices may mask underlying concentration, so digging deeper into disclosed holdings via issuer reports is advisable for a comprehensive risk analysis.

How do distributions from ETFs like HYG and LQD work for the investor?

ETFs like HYG and LQD typically distribute interest earned from their underlying bonds to shareholders. These distributions are usually paid monthly or quarterly, depending on the fund's schedule. The dividend yield reflects the annualised distribution as a percentage of the fund's current price. It is important to note that distributions are not guaranteed and can fluctuate based on the income generated by the portfolio's holdings.

Which investing goals are typically associated with high yield versus investment grade corporate bonds?

High yield funds like HYG are often associated with investors seeking higher current income and willing to accept higher credit risk for potential capital appreciation in economic upturns. Investment grade funds like LQD typically align with goals focused on capital preservation, lower volatility, and steady, moderate income from financially stable companies. The choice depends on the investor's risk tolerance and desired balance between safety and yield.

HYG vs LQD

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare HYG and LQD by fees, holdings, dividends and market focus. See how high-yield corporate bonds differ from investment-grade corporate bonds in structure and yield. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

HYG

Metric

LQD

0.49%

Expense Ratio

0.14%

6.02%

Dividend Yield

4.77%

$14.96B

Net Assets

$27.54B

1,339

Holdings

3,172

Apr 4, 2007

Inception Date

Jul 22, 2002

–

Index Tracked

–

High Yield Bond

Fund Category

Corporate Bond

LQD costs about $35.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

HYG vs JNK

Compare HYG and JNK. Review 0.49% vs 0.40% expense ratios, 6.02% vs 6.69% yields, net assets, and tracking. Holdings data not available for either fund.

HYG vs USHY

Compare HYG vs USHY expense ratios, dividend yields, and net assets. This page details high yield bond ETF differences for neutral educational research purposes

HYG vs SHYG

Compare HYG and SHYG iShares high yield ETFs. Review 0.49% vs 0.30% fees, 6.02% vs 7.06% yields, size, track record and holdings data availability.

Investment Analysis

HYG

Pros

The fund offers a dividend yield of 6.02%, providing a higher income stream than many core bond options.
It manages $15.0 billion in assets, indicating a large and highly liquid vehicle for corporate credit exposure.
With an inception date of Apr 4, 2007, the fund has a long track record of operations.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.49% is significantly higher than the cheaper alternative of the two funds.
Sector weight data is not available, making it difficult to assess specific industry concentration risks.
Its credit exposure carries higher default risk due to its classification as a high yield bond fund.

LQD

Pros

The expense ratio is low at 0.14%, reducing the drag on returns compared to higher-cost bond funds.
It has substantial net assets of $27.5 billion, supporting high trading liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads.
As an investment grade corporate bond fund, it focuses on issuers with lower default risk.

Considerations

The dividend yield of 4.77% is lower than the high yield option, offering less income potential.
Sector weight data is not available, limiting the ability to evaluate portfolio diversification across industries.
The fund has a longer history since Jul 22, 2002, but faces sensitivity to interest rate changes.

About HYG and LQD

HYG (HYG)

The iShares High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) provides investors with exposure to US high yield corporate bonds, often referred to as 'junk' or below-investment-grade debt. With a dividend yield of 6.02%, this fund aims to generate income through the relatively high coupon rates of these bonds. However, investors should remember that higher yields come with higher risks, including potential defaults and sensitivity to economic downturns. This fund offers a diversified portfolio of corporate bonds, potentially making it a useful component for those seeking income generation and portfolio diversification, though past performance does not guarantee future results.

LQD (LQD)

This ETF provides broad access to the USD investment-grade corporate bond market, aiming to track its overall performance. With net assets of approximately USD 27.54 billion and a low expense ratio of 0.14%, it offers a diversified portfolio holding over 3,000 individual bonds. The fund is designed for investors seeking exposure to the fixed-income market, particularly those looking to complement equity holdings with debt securities. Currently, it offers a dividend yield of 4.77%, reflecting interest income from the underlying bonds. Investors should be aware that, like all fixed-income funds, its value can fluctuate due to changes in interest rates and credit conditions. It is essential to consider personal financial goals and risk tolerance before investing, as capital is not guaranteed.

Buy HYG or LQD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

HYG vs LQD

Fund Snapshot