What does it mean that the top holdings for GLTR and IAU are listed as 'not available'?

When top holdings are 'not available', the comparison data does not specify which particular entities are held in each fund. This means you cannot directly see the underlying companies, metals, or instruments for either GLTR or IAU. Instead, you must rely on the fund names and categories, which suggest a focus on precious metals baskets for GLTR and gold exposure for IAU, to understand the investment theme.

How should I interpret the 'Index tracked: not available' field for these funds?

The 'Index tracked' field indicates the specific benchmark a fund aims to follow. When this is 'not available' for both GLTR and IAU, it means the provided comparison does not identify a formal index for either. This limits your ability to compare their tracking accuracy against a standard benchmark. You must understand that the data provided is incomplete regarding their specific tracking methodologies.

How do the expense ratios of GLTR and IAU compare and what does the difference mean?

GLTR has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while IAU has a lower expense ratio of 0.25%. This creates a difference of 0.35 percentage points. Over time, a higher expense ratio reduces net returns by a greater amount, assuming identical gross performance. Investors typically consider lower-cost funds more efficient for long-term holding unless the higher fee is justified by specific additional features or exposures, such as the basket approach of GLTR.

Given the lack of top holdings data, how can I assess the difference in exposure between GLTR and IAU?

With 'top holdings: not available' for both, you cannot assess direct security overlap. You must rely on their fund names and categories. GLTR is the 'Abrdn Precious Metals Basket', suggesting exposure to multiple precious metals. IAU is the 'iShares Gold' ETF, suggesting a primary focus on gold. The difference in exposure is thematic rather than verifiable through specific holdings in this dataset.

What do the 'Shared top-10 holdings: none' and 'not available' fields mean for diversification?

The 'Shared top-10 holdings: none' field is a direct comparison result, indicating that among the specific securities listed, there is no overlap. However, since both funds have 'Top holdings: not available', this comparison might reflect incomplete data. You cannot use this specific field to make diversification conclusions about the full portfolios of GLTR or IAU, as the underlying data is missing.

How do the net asset values of GLTR and IAU differ and what might this imply?

IAU has significantly larger net assets of $64.9 billion compared to GLTR's $2.8 billion. Larger asset bases, like IAU's, often imply higher liquidity and trading volume, which can lead to narrower bid-ask spreads. GLTR's smaller size might result in less liquidity. However, size alone does not determine investment merit, as the underlying strategy and cost are equally important.

Does the difference in inception dates between GLTR and IAU affect their current operation?

IAU was established on 21 January 2005, while GLTR launched on 22 October 2010. This five-year difference means IAU has a longer operational history in this comparison. However, the age of a fund does not directly impact its current expense ratio or dividend yield. Both funds are currently operating, and the difference is simply a historical fact from the provided data.

Are GLTR or IAU suitable for generating regular income based on dividend yields?

Neither fund is suitable for generating regular income based on the provided data, as both have a dividend yield of 0.00%. Physical metal ETFs and precious metal baskets typically do not pay interest or dividends. Their return profile relies entirely on the price performance of the underlying commodities.

If I am looking for diversified precious metals exposure versus single metal, how do these funds compare?

GLTR's name, 'Precious Metals Basket', suggests it aims to provide diversified exposure across several precious metals. IAU's name, 'iShares Gold', suggests a primary focus on gold. The provided data does not detail the specific metals in GLTR or the extent of IAU's non-gold exposure, so you must interpret this distinction based on the fund names alone.

What is the most critical data gap to note when comparing GLTR and IAU on this page?

The most critical data gap is the absence of 'Index tracked' and 'Top holdings' details for both funds. This prevents any detailed comparison of their specific benchmarks or underlying securities. Investors relying on this page must understand that they cannot verify how closely each fund follows its strategy or what specific assets are driving its performance.

GLTR vs IAU

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare GLTR and IAU to review their fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking methods. GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio with $2.8 billion in assets, while IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio with $64.9 billion in assets. This page helps you understand how each ETF approaches commodity exposure. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare GLTR and IAU to review their fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking methods. GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio with $2.8 billion in assets, while IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio with $64.9 billion...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

GLTR

Metric

IAU

0.60%

Expense Ratio

0.25%

0.00%

Dividend Yield

0.00%

$2.77B

Net Assets

$64.93B

4

Holdings

1

Oct 22, 2010

Inception Date

Jan 21, 2005

–

Index Tracked

–

Commodities Focused

Fund Category

Commodities Focused

IAU costs about $35.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

GLTR vs SLV

Compare GLTR and SLV ETFs on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking methods. Review expense ratios, net assets, and performance for informed research.

GLTR vs XME

Compare GLTR and XME ETFs on expense ratios, net assets and dividend yields. GLTR tracks precious metals; XME covers industrial mining equity holdings.

GLDM vs IAU

GLDM vs IAU compared: two physical gold trusts tracking the LBMA Gold Price at 0.10% and 0.25% a year. See the fee difference, fund size and history.

Investment Analysis

GLTR

Pros

GLTR offers direct exposure to a precious metals basket with net assets of $2.8 billion.
GLTR was launched on October 22, 2010, providing a distinct vintage within commodities.
GLTR is categorised as commodities focused, aligning with precious metals portfolio construction.

Considerations

GLTR carries a higher expense ratio of 0.60% relative to lower-cost gold products.
GLTR pays no dividend yield, relying solely on underlying metal price performance.
GLTR does not currently disclose an index tracked or top holdings details.

IAU

Pros

IAU benefits from a large asset base of $64.9 billion.
IAU has a lower expense ratio of 0.25%.
IAU was established on January 21, 2005.

Considerations

IAU pays a dividend yield of 0.00%.
IAU does not provide index tracked details in the supplied data.
IAU does not provide top holdings or sector weights in the supplied data.

Related Market Insights

When Silver Went Viral: The Making of a Meme Commodity

Explore silver's rise as the first meme commodity. Discover how social media drives unprecedented trading volumes and investment opportunities. Trade silver & miners with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

3 February 2026

Read Insight

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

Balance commodity price speculation with equity stakes in producers. Diversify exposure to raw materials, hedge inflation, and invest smart with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

When Silver Went Viral: The Making of a Meme Commodity

Explore silver's rise as the first meme commodity. Discover how social media drives unprecedented trading volumes and investment opportunities. Trade silver & miners with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

3 February 2026

Read Insight

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

Balance commodity price speculation with equity stakes in producers. Diversify exposure to raw materials, hedge inflation, and invest smart with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About GLTR and IAU

GLTR (GLTR)

GLTR is presented here as a ticker symbol without a named company. Before considering any investment, verify whether GLTR represents an ordinary share, ETF, trust, ADR or another instrument and identify the issuing company or fund manager. Check the exchange where it trades, the issuer’s website and regulatory filings for fundamentals, strategy, holdings, fees, market capitalisation and liquidity. Key considerations include sector exposure, revenue and earnings trends, balance-sheet strength, and — for funds — expense ratio and tracking error. Also review dividend policy, tax treatment and average trading volume. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns: values can fall as well as rise. This summary is general educational information only and not personalised advice. Suitability depends on your financial situation, objectives and risk tolerance; consult a qualified financial adviser if you need tailored guidance.

IAU (IAU)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Meme Commodity Trading: What's Next for Silver ETFs?

Silver prices have skyrocketed due to a retail investor frenzy, turning the precious metal into a "meme commodity." This theme identifies companies in the precious metals ecosystem, including miners and ETF providers, that stand to gain from the heightened trading activity and market volatility.

Published: 3 February 2026

Explore Basket

Paper Vs. Physical

Discover a carefully curated collection of investments that balance commodity price speculation with the companies that bring those resources to market. Our analysts have selected these assets to give you exposure to both sides of the materials economy in one strategic package.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Meme Commodity Trading: What's Next for Silver ETFs?

Silver prices have skyrocketed due to a retail investor frenzy, turning the precious metal into a "meme commodity." This theme identifies companies in the precious metals ecosystem, including miners and ETF providers, that stand to gain from the heightened trading activity and market volatility.

Published: 3 February 2026

Explore Basket

Paper Vs. Physical

Discover a carefully curated collection of investments that balance commodity price speculation with the companies that bring those resources to market. Our analysts have selected these assets to give you exposure to both sides of the materials economy in one strategic package.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

GLTR vs IAU

Fund Snapshot