What distinguishes the expense ratios of GLDM and GLTR?

GLDM charges a 0.10% expense ratio, while GLTR charges 0.60%. This 0.50 percentage point difference means that for every $10,000 invested, GLDM costs $10 annually compared to $60 for GLTR. Lower expenses theoretically leave more money compounding, though actual results depend on market performance and tracking accuracy.

What does the 'Commodities Focused' category imply?

The 'Commodities Focused' category indicates that these funds aim to provide exposure to physical assets or their derivatives rather than corporate equities. This asset class often behaves differently from stocks and bonds, potentially serving as a diversification tool. Understanding this helps investors assess how such ETFs fit within a broader, mixed-asset portfolio strategy.

Why are missing index details for GLDM and GLTR important?

Both funds list 'not available' for index tracked. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to verify exactly what market segments they follow. Without knowing the benchmark methodology, investors cannot confirm if the fund's performance aligns with their specific expectations for commodity exposure or compare it accurately against other ETFs.

How do GLDM's net assets affect its liquidity?

GLDM holds $31.7 billion in net assets. A larger asset base typically supports stronger liquidity, leading to tighter bid-ask spreads. This means investors can generally buy or sell shares at a price closer to the net asset value. High liquidity reduces trading costs and minimises the risk of price distortions during volatile market periods.

What does GLTR's inception date suggest about its history?

GLTR was launched on October 22, 2010, providing a longer track record compared to GLDM's 2018 launch. A longer operational history offers more historical data for assessing how the fund has managed its exposure through different economic cycles. However, past performance does not guarantee future results, and investors should still consider current structure and fees.

Do GLDM and GLTR share any top holdings?

According to the provided data, there are no shared top-10 holdings between GLDM and GLTR. This implies their underlying exposures may differ significantly, potentially targeting different segments within the commodities or precious metals space. Investors should note that missing top holdings data for both funds prevents a detailed analysis of their specific asset compositions.

Are there dividend payments for these precious metals ETFs?

Both GLDM and GLTR have a dividend yield of 0.00%. Since these funds track precious metals, which do not generate cash flow like dividends or interest, they typically do not distribute income. Any returns rely solely on capital appreciation, meaning investors benefit only if the market value of the fund's holdings increases over time.

How does GLDM's issuer reputation impact its perception?

GLDM is issued by iShares, a firm known for robust operational scale. This established reputation may provide investors with confidence in the fund's management and servicing capabilities. While issuer quality does not affect the underlying asset value, it contributes to the perceived stability and reliability of the fund's administrative operations and liquidity provision.

What is known about GLTR's issuer details?

The issuer identity for GLTR is not available in the current data. This lack of information creates uncertainty regarding the specific entity responsible for fund governance and operational oversight. Transparency about the fund sponsor is crucial for assessing operational risks, trustworthiness, and the robustness of the management infrastructure backing the ETF's daily operations and compliance.

How should beginners approach comparing fees and assets?

Beginners should compare GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio and $31.7 billion assets against GLTR's 0.60% ratio and $2.8 billion assets. Lower fees and higher assets usually suggest better cost efficiency and liquidity. Additionally, note that GLDM lacks a long track record compared to GLTR, which has been operational since 2010, offering different historical data perspectives.

Does the data include a financial advice disclaimer?

Yes, this comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence or consult with a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions. The data provided reflects specific metrics such as expenses and assets, but does not assess suitability for individual financial circumstances or risk tolerance.

GLDM vs GLTR

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare GLDM and GLTR: World Gold Spdr Gold Minishares and Abrdn Precious Metals Basket. This page outlines their fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. Note that index details are not available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare GLDM and GLTR: World Gold Spdr Gold Minishares and Abrdn Precious Metals Basket. This page outlines their fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. Note that index details are not availa...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

GLDM

Metric

GLTR

0.10%

Expense Ratio

0.60%

0.00%

Dividend Yield

0.00%

$31.71B

Net Assets

$2.77B

1

Holdings

4

Jun 25, 2018

Inception Date

Oct 22, 2010

–

Index Tracked

–

Commodities Focused

Fund Category

Commodities Focused

GLDM costs about $50.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

GLDM vs IAU

GLDM vs IAU compared: two physical gold trusts tracking the LBMA Gold Price at 0.10% and 0.25% a year. See the fee difference, fund size and history.

GLDM vs PHYS

Compare GLDM vs PHYS: expenses, holdings, dividends and tracking. GLDM costs 0.10 percent with 31.7 billion assets; PHYS is 0.41 percent with unavailable data.

GLDM vs IAUM

Compare GLDM and IAUM, two gold ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.10% and 0.09%, net assets, dividend yields, holdings and tracking methods for informed analysis

Investment Analysis

GLDM

Pros

Low expense ratio of 0.10% enhances net returns relative to higher-cost commodity vehicles.
Large asset base of 31.7 billion dollars supports strong liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads.
Issuer iShares has a reputation for robust operational scale and investor servicing capabilities.

Considerations

Tracked index details are not available, limiting transparency on methodology and exposure.
Top holdings and sector weights are not available, hindering direct assessment of concentration risk.
Dividend yield is 0.00%, offering no regular income stream to investors.

GLTR

Pros

Inception date in October 2010 provides a long track record of operational performance.
Net assets of 2.8 billion dollars indicate sufficient scale to mitigate closure risks.
Category focus on commodities supports portfolio diversification when integrated with traditional asset classes.

Considerations

Expense ratio of 0.60% is significantly higher than the 0.10% charged by GLDM.
Issuer identity is not available, creating uncertainty regarding fund governance and operational oversight.
Top holdings and sector weights are not available, preventing detailed analysis of underlying exposure.

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

A criminal probe into the Fed Chair has sent gold prices soaring to record highs. Discover how Nemo's Gold Rush Neme helps investors gain exposure to this ultimate safe haven asset.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

13 January 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

A criminal probe into the Fed Chair has sent gold prices soaring to record highs. Discover how Nemo's Gold Rush Neme helps investors gain exposure to this ultimate safe haven asset.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

13 January 2026

Read Insight

About GLDM and GLTR

GLDM (GLDM)

GLTR (GLTR)

GLTR is presented here as a ticker symbol without a named company. Before considering any investment, verify whether GLTR represents an ordinary share, ETF, trust, ADR or another instrument and identify the issuing company or fund manager. Check the exchange where it trades, the issuer’s website and regulatory filings for fundamentals, strategy, holdings, fees, market capitalisation and liquidity. Key considerations include sector exposure, revenue and earnings trends, balance-sheet strength, and — for funds — expense ratio and tracking error. Also review dividend policy, tax treatment and average trading volume. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns: values can fall as well as rise. This summary is general educational information only and not personalised advice. Suitability depends on your financial situation, objectives and risk tolerance; consult a qualified financial adviser if you need tailored guidance.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

An unprecedented criminal probe into the Federal Reserve Chair has sparked a flight to safety, driving gold prices to record highs. This theme focuses on gold miners and related companies that stand to benefit from sustained demand for this safe-haven asset.

Published: 13 January 2026

Explore Basket