What is the main difference in fees between GDX and SGDM?

The GDX fund has an expense ratio of 0.51%, whereas SGDM charges 0.46%. This 0.05 percentage point difference might seem small but can impact net returns over long periods. Lower fees mean less drag on your investment, assuming all other factors are equal. For long-term investors, even minor fee differences can accumulate, affecting overall growth. Always consider the total cost of ownership when evaluating ETFs, as this influences the effective return on your invested capital.

How do the net asset sizes of GDX and SGDM differ?

GDX has significantly larger net assets, valued at $28.4 billion, compared to SGDM's $713 million. A larger asset base typically indicates higher liquidity, which can result in tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient execution for larger orders. Conversely, SGDM's smaller size might lead to slightly wider spreads. Investors should weigh liquidity against other factors like fees and strategy. Understanding these differences helps in anticipating potential trading costs and execution quality for each fund.

What is the historical performance context for these funds?

GDX was launched in May 2006, offering nearly two decades of historical data for analysis. SGDM started in July 2014, providing a shorter but still substantial track record across various market cycles. A longer history can help investors evaluate how a fund behaves in different economic conditions, such as rising interest rates or gold price fluctuations. SGDM's shorter history is less critical for short-term strategies but may limit long-term trend analysis compared to GDX's extensive data.

What are the top holdings for GDX and SGDM?

Both funds share significant overlap in their top holdings. NEM, AU, and CDE are common stocks in both ETFs. GDX holds NEM at 10.91%, AU at 5.02%, and CDE at 2.29%. SGDM also holds these stocks with NEM at 7.42%, AU at 1.74%, and CDE at 3.57%. These holdings indicate both funds invest primarily in large gold mining companies, suggesting that a significant portion of their returns will correlate with the performance of these key stocks, regardless of the fund's overall structure.

How do the dividend yields of GDX and SGDM compare?

SGDM offers a dividend yield of 0.91%, which is higher than GDX's 0.66%. This makes SGDM potentially more attractive for investors seeking regular income streams. However, dividend yields fluctuate with share prices and payout decisions by the underlying companies. While a higher yield is beneficial for income-focused strategies, it is essential to also consider the fund's overall expense ratio and capital growth potential. Investors should evaluate whether the income component aligns with their broader portfolio objectives.

What is the index tracking methodology for these funds?

Neither GDX nor SGDM provides publicly available index tracking methodology or sector weight information. This lack of transparency means investors cannot verify exactly which benchmark each fund follows or how the portfolio weights are determined internally. Consequently, direct performance comparison against a specific index is not feasible for retail investors based on available public data. Investors should be aware of this information gap and consider it a factor in their risk assessment process when selecting between these two precious metal miners.

How does diversification differ between GDX and SGDM?

GDX claims broad diversification with no single holding exceeding 10.91% of total assets, while SGDM's largest holding, NEM, comprises 7.42% of its portfolio. A lower maximum holding weight in SGDM could theoretically imply slightly more diversified exposure at the top tier, though full portfolio holdings for SGDM are not disclosed. Conversely, GDX's massive asset base allows for a vast range of holdings. Investors seeking exposure without excessive concentration risk may prefer funds with lower top-position weights, but must balance this with other factors like liquidity and cost.

What factors influence the stock price movement of GDX and SGDM?

Since both funds are ETFs tracking gold miners, their stock prices are directly influenced by the price of physical gold and the operational performance of mining companies. Factors include mine production costs, geopolitical risks in mining regions, and overall market sentiment toward commodities. While the underlying gold price is a major driver, the funds' specific holdings and expense ratios also affect their relative performance. Market conditions causing shifts in precious metal investments will simultaneously impact both ETFs, though the magnitude may differ based on their specific portfolio compositions.

What are the risks associated with these precious metal ETFs?

Primary risks include gold price volatility, operational risks for mining companies (e.g., regulatory changes, mining disasters), and sector-specific downturns. Additionally, GDX's issuer being ARK may present a different profile, whereas SGDM's issuer is not available, which could impact transparency. The lack of disclosed index tracking for both adds uncertainty regarding their exact strategy execution. Currency risks in foreign mining jurisdictions also affect valuations. Investors should be prepared for periods of underperformance compared to gold bullion due to these compounded operational and market risks.

Why might the dividend yield fluctuate for these ETFs?

Dividend yields for ETFs like GDX and SGDM fluctuate primarily due to changes in their share prices and payouts from underlying mining companies. Gold mining companies may adjust dividends based on their cash flow, capital expenditure needs, and commodity prices. Therefore, even if a company maintains a stable payout, a drop in the ETF's share price can increase the yield, while a rise decreases it. Investors should view the yield as a dynamic metric rather than a fixed income guarantee, especially in the volatile precious metals sector.

Which fund is better for long-term holding versus frequent trading?

GDX's massive net assets and liquidity make it suitable for both long-term holding and large block trades due to efficient execution. SGDM's smaller size and higher dividend yield may appeal to income-focused investors, but its liquidity could be a constraint for frequent large trades. While neither fund's tracking index is available, SGDM's lower expense ratio benefits long-term compounding. Frequent traders must consider bid-ask spreads; GDX's liquidity advantage there might outweigh the slightly lower yield compared to SGDM's income focus.

How does lack of sector weight data affect investment decisions?

The unavailability of sector weights for both GDX and SGDM limits investors' ability to analyze concentration risk and geographic exposure. Without these details, it is challenging to determine if one fund is more heavily invested in high-growth regions or specific mining jurisdictions compared to the other. This gap forces reliance on top holdings as a proxy for broader exposure. Investors seeking detailed geographic diversification should note this transparency limitation, potentially requiring additional fundamental analysis of the top holdings to infer the underlying sector and geographic allocation.

GDX vs SGDM

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare GDX (Gold Miners Market Vectors ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Etf Gold Miners Etf) on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, while SGDM is 0.46%. Note that index tracking details are not available for either fund, though both share top holdings like NEM and AU. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare GDX (Gold Miners Market Vectors ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Etf Gold Miners Etf) on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, while SGDM is 0.46%. Note that index track...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

GDX

Metric

SGDM

0.51%

Expense Ratio

0.46%

0.66%

Dividend Yield

0.91%

$28.42B

Net Assets

$712.86M

62

Holdings

52

May 22, 2006

Inception Date

Jul 15, 2014

–

Index Tracked

–

Equity Precious Metals

Fund Category

Equity Precious Metals

SGDM costs about $5.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	GDX	SGDM
NEMNewmont Corporation	10.91%	7.42%
AUAngloGold Ashanti plc	5.02%	1.74%
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.	2.29%	3.57%

Discover More Comparisons

GDX vs GLD

Compare GDX and GLD: 0.51% vs 0.40% expense ratio, 62 gold mining stocks vs physical bullion, a 0.67% yield vs no dividend, and $28B vs $148B in assets.

GDX vs RING

Compare GDX and RING ETFs. Review expenses, assets, dividends, holdings, and tracking details to understand key differences between these gold miners.

GDX vs SLVP

Compare GDX and SLVP ETFs. Review fee structures, top holdings, dividend yields, tracking methods, and operational history for these precious metals funds.

Investment Analysis

GDX

Pros

High liquidity due to substantial net assets of $28.4 billion reduces trading spreads and ensures efficient execution of large orders.
Long track record since inception in May 2006 provides comprehensive historical data for performance analysis and investor familiarity.
Broad diversification is achieved through a wide range of holdings, with no single position exceeding 10.91% of total assets.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.51% is relatively high for an ETF, which may erode net returns for long-term holders compared to cheaper alternatives.
The dividend yield of 0.66% is modest, potentially making it less attractive to income-focused investors compared to higher-yielding options.
Lack of disclosed index tracking methodology and sector weights introduces uncertainty regarding the fund's specific strategy and risk profile.

SGDM

Pros

A lower expense ratio of 0.46% compared to GDX allows for potentially higher net returns for investors over time.
The dividend yield of 0.91% is higher than GDX, providing a more attractive income stream for investors seeking regular payouts.
Inception in July 2014 provides a reasonably long track record for investors to evaluate performance across different market cycles.

Considerations

Smaller net assets of $713 million may result in wider bid-ask spreads and higher market impact costs for large transactions.
Absence of an identified issuer, index tracking information, and sector weights makes it difficult for investors to assess the fund's management quality and transparency.
The fund has limited data availability, such as sector weights and index tracking, which may hinder comprehensive performance and risk analysis for potential investors.

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

A criminal probe into the Fed Chair has sent gold prices soaring to record highs. Discover how Nemo's Gold Rush Neme helps investors gain exposure to this ultimate safe haven asset.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

13 January 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

A criminal probe into the Fed Chair has sent gold prices soaring to record highs. Discover how Nemo's Gold Rush Neme helps investors gain exposure to this ultimate safe haven asset.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

13 January 2026

Read Insight

About GDX and SGDM

GDX (GDX)

GDX (Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF) gives investors broad exposure to publicly listed companies engaged in gold mining and related activities. As an ETF, it tracks an index of gold miner equities rather than the metal itself, so its performance reflects miners’ share prices, production profiles, costs and sensitivity to gold prices. GDX can offer a convenient way to gain sector exposure, diversification across many miners, and liquidity via an exchange-traded structure, but it also concentrates on a single commodity-linked industry which can be volatile. Factors investors should monitor include the gold price, miners’ operational costs, geopolitical risks in mining regions, and changes in interest rates that influence gold demand. This information is for educational purposes only and is not personal financial advice; values can fall as well as rise and past performance is not a guide to the future. Suitability depends on individual circumstances and risk tolerance.

SGDM (SGDM)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

An unprecedented criminal probe into the Federal Reserve Chair has sparked a flight to safety, driving gold prices to record highs. This theme focuses on gold miners and related companies that stand to benefit from sustained demand for this safe-haven asset.

Published: 13 January 2026

Explore Basket