How do the expense ratios of FXI and MCHI compare and what does this mean for costs?

FXI has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while MCHI has an expense ratio of 0.59%. This represents a difference of 0.15 percentage points. The expense ratio is an annual fee deducted from the fund's assets, affecting net returns. Over time, a lower expense ratio allows more of the fund's gross returns to remain in the investor's pocket. While the absolute difference is small, in long-term investing, even minor fee variations can compound, impacting overall wealth accumulation. Investors should consider this cost differential when comparing ETFs with similar objectives.

What is the impact of the expense ratio difference between FXI and MCHI over time?

The expense ratio difference between FXI (0.74%) and MCHI (0.59%) amounts to 0.15 percentage points annually. Over time, this difference compounds, meaning MCHI's lower cost structure could allow investors to retain more of their returns. While the impact varies with market performance, the cost advantage of MCHI becomes more significant as investment horizons lengthen. It highlights the importance of considering expense ratios as part of the total cost of ownership, alongside other factors such as liquidity and tracking accuracy. This cost efficiency is a key consideration for long-term investors.

How do the fund structures of FXI and MCHI differ regarding index tracking?

The index tracking methodology for FXI is not available for independent verification, which may limit transparency for investors. In contrast, MCHI, while also not disclosing its specific index, includes growth-oriented holdings like PDD, albeit with a low weight of 1.65%. Investors should be aware that the lack of detailed index information may affect the ability to assess tracking accuracy and potential biases. Understanding the underlying index or benchmark is crucial for evaluating how well an ETF mirrors its intended market segment and risk profile. Therefore, MCHI offers slightly more transparency with specific holding details.

Why are net assets and liquidity important for ETFs?

Net assets and liquidity are critical for ETFs because they ensure that the fund operates smoothly without significant slippage, which occurs when the difference between the expected price of a trade and the actual execution price is substantial. MCHI has net assets of $6.1 billion, while FXI has $4.1 billion, making MCHI more liquid. Higher liquidity is beneficial for active traders and those who might need to sell their holdings quickly, as it supports tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient market operations.

How do the inception dates of FXI and MCHI compare?

FXI was established on 5 October 2004, while MCHI started on 29 March 2011. The longer track record of FXI suggests more operational history, providing insights into its performance across different market cycles. MCHI, being a newer fund, lacks this depth of historical data. Investors often consider the operational history of an ETF, as it can highlight how the fund handled past market conditions, though it does not guarantee future performance.

Are there overlapping top holdings between FXI and MCHI?

The provided data does not list any shared top-10 holdings between FXI and MCHI. FXI focuses on large-cap Chinese equities but lacks detailed top holdings, while MCHI explicitly lists PDD at 1.65%. The absence of overlap indicates that these funds, despite both targeting Greater China, may employ different selection criteria or benchmarks. This distinction suggests that investors could achieve different exposures by holding both, but they should verify the underlying composition to understand the exact differences in their portfolios.

How do the dividend yields of FXI and MCHI compare?

FXI has a dividend yield of 1.95%, while MCHI has a yield of 2.01%. These yields indicate that MCHI offers a slightly higher income potential from distributions. However, dividend yields can vary based on the underlying holdings' payout policies and market conditions. Both ETFs provide some income, but they are primarily growth-oriented vehicles, meaning their main appeal lies in capital appreciation rather than steady cash flow. Investors seeking income should consider the total return, including both dividends and capital gains.

How do dividend distributions work for ETFs?

ETF dividend distributions involve allocating profits from underlying holdings to shareholders. The frequency can vary (quarterly, annually). Distributions may comprise dividends, capital gains, or return of capital. Investors should distinguish taxable from tax-advantaged portions. MCHI, with a 2.01% dividend yield, offers income through distributions, which are typically based on dividends received by the underlying stocks. Investors may receive these as cash or reinvest them, impacting the total return profile. FXI, yielding 1.95%, works similarly.

What risks should investors be aware of with ETFs?

ETFs like FXI and MCHI are subject to market risk. FXI's large-cap focus and MCHI's growth-oriented exposure, with lower transparency on holdings, imply different potential risks. FXI's index tracking method is not available, limiting independent verification. Both funds may not fully represent the Chinese market, with FXI potentially excluding smaller growth companies. Liquidity risk is lower due to MCHI's substantial $6.1 billion net assets. Investors should be mindful of the broader market volatility and the specific fund strategies when evaluating risk.

How do the fund sizes of FXI and MCHI compare in terms of liquidity?

MCHI, with $6.1 billion in net assets, is larger than FXI's $4.1 billion. This suggests MCHI may have better trading liquidity, as larger funds often benefit from more frequent trading and tighter bid-ask spreads. Liquidity is crucial for executing trades without significantly affecting the market price. While both funds are sizeable, MCHI's superior net asset value provides a potential advantage for investors concerned with ease of entry and exit. This is especially relevant for those engaging in more active trading strategies.

What is the significance of dividend yield in ETF investing?

Dividend yield signifies income from an ETF's holdings. FXI offers a 1.95% yield, while MCHI provides 2.01%, indicating slightly higher potential income from MCHI. Dividend yield is crucial for income-focused investors, but it should not be the sole consideration. Investors must also assess the stability of the yield, the tax implications, and the underlying holdings. The yield's contribution to total return varies; for growth-oriented funds, capital appreciation may outweigh dividend income, making yield a secondary factor.

How do the fee structures of FXI and MCHI affect long-term investing?

FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, while MCHI charges 0.59%. These fees significantly influence long-term returns, especially over decades. MCHI's lower cost implies that more of the fund's performance remains with the investor. The difference of 0.15 percentage points can accumulate to a substantial sum over time, affecting the compounding effect. Investors must consider the total cost of ownership, including expense ratios, trading costs, and potential tax impacts, as part of their investment evaluation process.

FXI vs MCHI

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks the market. FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, while MCHI charges 0.59%. Both focus on Greater China region equities. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks the market. FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, while MCHI...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FXI

Metric

MCHI

0.74%

Expense Ratio

0.59%

1.95%

Dividend Yield

2.01%

$4.10B

Net Assets

$6.12B

60

Holdings

586

Oct 5, 2004

Inception Date

Mar 29, 2011

–

Index Tracked

–

Greater China Region

Fund Category

Greater China Region

MCHI costs about $15.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

FXI vs KWEB

Compare FXI vs KWEB, examining fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking methods. FXI: 0.74% ratio, 1.95% yield. KWEB: 0.69% ratio, 8.20% yield. Data included.

EWH vs MCHI

Compare EWH and MCHI ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings, and tracking methods to decide which fund suits research.

CQQQ vs MCHI

Compare CQQQ and MCHI ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields and holdings. Note index tracking data is not available for both funds.

Investment Analysis

FXI

Pros

Long track record since 2004 provides established operational history.
Substantial assets of $4.1 billion support liquidity and stability.
A dividend yield of 1.95% offers some regular income for investors.

Considerations

Higher expense ratio of 0.74% increases annual cost burden.
Large-cap focus may limit exposure to smaller Chinese growth companies.
Index tracking methodology is not available for independent verification.

MCHI

Pros

Lower expense ratio of 0.59% reduces the total annual cost of ownership.
Larger net assets of $6.1 billion potentially enhance trading liquidity and stability.
Exposure includes growth-oriented holdings like PDD, albeit with low weight.

Considerations

Shorter track record since 2011 compared to longer-established Chinese ETFs.
Top holdings concentration is unclear as detailed weights are not available.
Dividend yield of 2.01% offers only modest income generation potential.

Related Market Insights

China Exports Explained | Trade Boom Sector Breakdown

Discover how China's 21.8% export surge impacts global markets. Explore top shipping, e-commerce, and mining stocks on Nemo's thematic investment platform.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

10 March 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

China Exports Explained | Trade Boom Sector Breakdown

Discover how China's 21.8% export surge impacts global markets. Explore top shipping, e-commerce, and mining stocks on Nemo's thematic investment platform.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

10 March 2026

Read Insight

About FXI and MCHI

FXI (FXI)

iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) provides investors with liquid, broad exposure to large-cap Chinese equities through a single, exchange-traded product. FXI primarily tracks a benchmark of major China-based companies — often H‑shares, Red Chips and other large listings — offering a straightforward way to access prominent names in sectors such as financials, telecommunications and energy. As an ETF, FXI can be bought and sold on an exchange like a share, and its price moves with the underlying index and market sentiment. Investors should note this is a China-focused, large-cap play, so performance depends heavily on Chinese economic conditions, policy, currency movements and geopolitics. Fees, tracking error and concentration risk in the largest holdings can affect returns. This summary is for educational purposes only and not personalised financial advice; values can rise or fall and you could lose capital. Consider your investment horizon, diversification needs and tolerance for emerging-market and country-specific risks before investing.

MCHI (MCHI)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

China Exports Explained | Trade Boom Sector Breakdown

China's manufacturing sector demonstrated remarkable resilience with a massive 21.8% surge in early 2026 exports, pushing the nation's trade surplus to a record high. This unexpected boom signals robust global demand and shifting trade dynamics, creating a compelling opportunity in logistics, global tech, and emerging market commodities.

Published: 10 March 2026

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

China Exports Explained | Trade Boom Sector Breakdown

China's manufacturing sector demonstrated remarkable resilience with a massive 21.8% surge in early 2026 exports, pushing the nation's trade surplus to a record high. This unexpected boom signals robust global demand and shifting trade dynamics, creating a compelling opportunity in logistics, global tech, and emerging market commodities.

Published: 10 March 2026

Explore Basket

FXI vs MCHI

Fund Snapshot