What distinguishes the fundamental weighting of Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) from standard market-cap strategies?

FNDB uses a fundamental weighting methodology, offering a value tilt that differs from conventional market-cap strategies. Unlike funds that weight companies solely by stock price and shares outstanding, FNDB considers financial metrics. This approach aims to reduce reliance on valuation-driven price movements. However, this specific construction means its exposure diverges from standard broad-market indices, creating a distinct risk-return profile compared to market-cap weighted alternatives.

How do the expense ratios of FNDB and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) compare, and what does this fee difference mean over time?

FNDB carries an expense ratio of 0.25%, whereas VTI operates at 0.03%. This represents a 0.22 percentage point difference. Over extended holding periods, higher fees compound, potentially eroding net returns more significantly than lower-cost alternatives. While both funds aim to track US equity markets, the cost structure varies. Investors should analyse how these specific expense ratios impact long-term accumulation of capital based on the stated data.

What are the implications of VTI's heavy concentration in mega-cap technology firms for portfolio risk?

VTI's top holdings include significant weights in NVDA (6.87%) and AAPL (6.30%). This concentration creates specific single-stock and sector risks. If the technology sector underperforms, the fund's overall value may reflect this downturn more sharply than a diversified approach with different weighting. As a market-cap weighted fund, VTI remains vulnerable to valuation fluctuations within its largest constituent companies, potentially amplifying sector-specific impacts on performance.

Which investing goals are FNDB and VTI typically associated with based on their structural characteristics?

FNDB is categorised as Large Value, potentially aligning with goals focused on fundamental-driven valuation metrics and a slightly higher dividend yield of 1.41%. VTI is Large Blend, targeting broad market exposure, historically associated with core equity allocation goals despite a lower 1.02% yield. Neither classification dictates suitability; rather, they reflect different methodologies. Investors should evaluate how these structural traits align with their specific financial objectives without implying a recommendation for either fund.

How do the top ten holdings of FNDB and VTI demonstrate the impact of different weighting methodologies?

Both funds list AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, and GOOG in their top ten, showing common large-company exposure. However, FNDB includes XOM (2.25%) and INTC (1.62%) in its top holdings, reflecting fundamental inputs, whereas VTI's list features NVDA (6.87%) and AVGO (2.37%), reflecting market-cap weightings. This overlap confirms both track US large caps but highlights distinct weighting impacts on individual stock exposure within the top ten positions.

How do dividend yields differ between FNDB and VTI, and how do distributions function within ETFs?

FNDB presents a 1.41% dividend yield, while VTI reports 1.02%, suggesting a slight income advantage for FNDB based on the provided data. ETFs collect dividends from underlying holdings, which may accrue or distribute periodically. Investors should note that yields fluctuate with both company payouts and ETF market prices. The specific distribution frequency depends on fund documentation, which is not available here.

How do the inception dates of FNDB and VTI influence the availability of historical performance data?

VTI launched in May 2001, providing over two decades of data spanning various economic cycles. FNDB's inception in August 2013 results in a shorter track record. This difference means VTI offers a longer historical window for analysing how each fund navigates market conditions. However, past performance is not indicative of future results, and investors should note the limited historical context available for the newer fund compared to the established alternative.

Why is tracking index details unavailable for both FNDB and VTI in this comparison?

For both funds, the index tracked is listed as 'not available' in the current dataset. Without this specific identifier, precise asset allocation analysis remains complicated. The fund names and categories suggest broad US market focus, but the exact benchmark methodologies differ. This lack of transparency means investors cannot directly verify adherence to specific index rules from this comparison alone.

How does the size of VTI's net assets affect its liquidity compared to FNDB?

VTI manages $692.2 billion in assets, ensuring superior liquidity and typically tighter trading spreads due to massive scale. FNDB holds $1.5 billion, which still supports efficient trading for most retail investors but with less absolute market presence. Higher asset bases often correlate with greater daily volume, facilitating larger transactions with less impact on the share price compared to smaller funds.

What sector weight information is available for FNDB and VTI to aid in portfolio construction?

For both FNDB and VTI, the sector weights are listed as 'not available' in the provided data. This omission prevents precise analysis of sector exposure at this level. Investors must rely on top holdings and fund categories (Large Value vs Large Blend) to infer composition. This data gap necessitates caution when attempting to assess sector diversification.

What are the educational limitations of this comparison regarding the sector weights of FNDB and VTI?

The provided dataset marks sector weights for both FNDB and VTI as not available. Consequently, this comparison cannot illustrate how each fund distributes capital across different industry groups. While top holdings reveal individual company exposure, the broader sectoral balance remains undefined. Investors should note this lack of transparency and seek official fund documentation to determine sector allocation specifics for portfolio construction.

FNDB vs VTI

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) with Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market, using data as of September 22, 2026. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FNDB

Metric

VTI

0.25%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.41%

Dividend Yield

1.02%

$1.52B

Net Assets

$692.20B

1,625

Holdings

3,514

Aug 8, 2013

Inception Date

May 24, 2001

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Blend

VTI costs about $22.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	FNDB	VTI
AAPLApple Inc.	4.46%	6.30%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	2.61%	5.10%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	1.71%	2.70%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	1.63%	3.41%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	1.36%	2.12%

Discover More Comparisons

FNDB vs SCHV

Compare FNDB and SCHV ETFs. Review 0.25% vs 0.04% fees, dividend yields, holdings and large value tracking. Neutral data analysis for fund research.

FNDB vs VOO

Compare FNDB vs VOO: fees, dividends, holdings, and tracking. Schwab fundamental broad market versus Vanguard S&P 500 ETF facts and figures.

FNDB vs SCHD

Compare FNDB vs SCHD. Review expense ratios, dividend yields, and top holdings for these Schwab Large Value ETFs. Data includes costs and composition.

Investment Analysis

FNDB

Pros

FNDB offers a value tilt through its fundamental weighting methodology, distinguishing it from conventional market-cap strategies.
The fund maintains reasonable liquidity with net assets of $1.5 billion, supporting efficient trading for most retail investors.
FNDB provides a slightly higher dividend yield of 1.41%, potentially offering greater income relative to broad market alternatives.

Considerations

With an expense ratio of 0.25%, FNDB is significantly costlier than the market-cap weighted competitor VTI.
The fund's inception in August 2013 results in a shorter track record compared to Vanguard's long-established index strategy.
FNDB lacks full transparency on sector weights and index tracking details, complicating precise asset allocation analysis.

VTI

Pros

VTI delivers exceptionally low costs with a 0.03% expense ratio, enhancing net returns for long-term holders.
The fund manages enormous scale with $692.2 billion in assets, ensuring superior liquidity and tight trading spreads.
Inception in May 2001 provides a proven track record spanning multiple economic cycles and market conditions.

Considerations

VTI's dividend yield of 1.02% is lower than FNDB's, potentially reducing immediate income for cash-flow-focused investors.
The top holdings are heavily concentrated in mega-cap technology firms, creating significant single-stock and sector risk.
As a market-cap weighted fund, VTI is vulnerable to valuation bubbles within its largest constituent companies.

About FNDB and VTI

FNDB (FNDB)

The Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) offers investors a way to access large-cap U.S. stocks using a fundamental indexing approach. Unlike traditional index funds that weight companies by market capitalisation, this ETF weights holdings based on fundamental measures such as revenue, cash flow, and earnings. This methodology aims to reduce exposure to overvalued stocks and increase exposure to undervalued ones, potentially enhancing long-term returns. With an expense ratio of 0.25% and net assets of USD 1.52 billion, FNDB provides a cost-effective and diversified investment vehicle. It holds 1,625 companies, offering broad market exposure with a value tilt. As with all investments, it is important to remember that the value of shares can fall as well as rise, and returns are not guaranteed.

VTI (VTI)

This ETF offers broad exposure to the US equity market by tracking a comprehensive index of publicly traded companies. Designed as a large blend fund, it holds thousands of individual stocks, ranging from massive multinational corporations to smaller domestic firms. With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, it aims to provide cost-efficient long-term growth potential. The fund has a dividend yield of approximately 1.02%, reflecting the aggregate distributions from its holdings. Investors often consider this vehicle for core portfolio diversification, though it is essential to remember that stock market investments carry inherent risks, and values can fluctuate. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and returns are not guaranteed.

Buy FNDB or VTI in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

FNDB vs VTI

Fund Snapshot