FLRNFLTR

FLRN vs FLTR

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare the SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) with the VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Educ...

Investment Analysis

FLRN

FLRN

FLRN

Pros

  • FLRN has a long track record since its inception in late 2011.
  • FLRN's moderate assets of $3.1 billion suggest sufficient liquidity.
  • The fund's dividend yield of 4.32% offers competitive income generation.

Considerations

  • FLRN's expense ratio of 0.15% is marginally higher than FLTR's.
  • Index tracking details for FLRN are not available.
  • Top holdings and sector weights for FLRN are not available.
FLTR

FLTR

FLTR

Pros

  • FLTR has a low expense ratio of 0.14%.
  • FLTR's net assets are slightly higher at $3.3 billion.
  • FLTR has a longer inception date from April 2011.

Considerations

  • FLTR's index tracking details are not available.
  • Top holdings for FLTR are not available.
  • Sector weights for FLTR are not available.

Buy FLRN or FLTR in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions