What is the primary difference between FENY and XLE regarding their scale and liquidity?

The most significant structural difference lies in their total net assets. XLE commands a substantially larger asset base of $41.3 billion compared to FENY’s $2.1 billion. In practical terms, a larger fund like XLE typically offers deeper liquidity, which can result in tighter bid-ask spreads for traders. FENY’s smaller size suggests reasonable scale for Fidelity’s energy exposure, but investors seeking the highest trading liquidity generally favour established, larger funds like XLE.

How does the history of these two energy sector ETFs differ?

Inception dates provide context for how long each fund has operated. XLE launched in December 1998, giving it over two decades of history as an established benchmark in the market. FENY, conversely, was launched much later in October 2013. This age gap explains why XLE is often the default choice for institutional investors. While FENY offers a more modern structure, it lacks the decades of operational track record that XLE brings, which can impact investor confidence and familiarity.

What is an expense ratio and how do FENY and XLE compare on costs?

An expense ratio represents the annual fee charged by a fund. For FENY and XLE, both funds maintain a competitive 0.08% expense ratio. Since the fee is identical, there is no cost advantage to choosing one over the other on this specific metric. This means that for every £10,000 invested, both funds deduct the same amount annually. When costs align, investors must look to other factors like liquidity, tracking methodology, or fund size to differentiate the products.

How do the dividend yields of FENY and XLE compare?

Both funds provide income to shareholders. XLE offers a slightly higher dividend yield of 2.47%, reflecting its role as a mature benchmark with substantial cash-generating holdings. FENY provides a yield of 2.32%, which is still moderate and competitive within the sector. The 15-basis-point difference indicates that XLE currently pays out marginally more relative to its share price. However, investors should note that yields fluctuate based on dividend declarations by the underlying companies, not just the ETF structure itself.

How much overlap exists in the top holdings of FENY and XLE?

Analysis of the top ten holdings reveals that these two funds track an almost identical basket of companies. Both include energy giants such as XOM, CVX, COP, MPC, VLO, PSX, WMB, EOG, SLB, and TRGP as their leading positions. Despite the near-perfect overlap in names, the specific weighting differs slightly. For instance, XLE allocates 23.09% to XOM versus 22.03% in FENY. This confirms that while the underlying composition is similar, the precise portfolio construction rules vary between issuers.

Which fund offers better diversification within the energy sector?

Interestingly, detailed sector weight data is not available for either FENY or XLE, limiting precise analysis of sub-sector diversification. Both funds are categorised as Equity Energy, meaning they concentrate risk within a single sector rather than offering broad market diversification. While FENY holds top energy companies, and XLE does likewise, investors are essentially buying the same slice of the market. Therefore, neither fund provides diversification *outside* the energy sector, and detailed sub-sector breakdowns remain opaque without further data.

How do FENY and XLE differ in their exposure to major oil companies?

A closer look at the top holdings highlights the dominance of major integrated oil companies in both funds. XOM is the largest holding in both, though XLE weights it slightly higher at 23.09% compared to FENY’s 22.03%. Similarly, CVX is the second-largest position in both, with XLE holding 17.71% versus FENY’s 14.37%. This indicates that XLE leans more heavily towards the largest, established supermajors, whereas FENY provides somewhat broader exposure to the rest of the top-ten list.

Is transparency on tracking methodology available for these funds?

According to the provided data, the specific index tracked is 'not available' for both FENY and XLE. This is a notable gap for investors who wish to understand exactly how and when the fund rebalances its holdings. Without visibility into the tracked index, it is difficult to predict how the funds will react to corporate actions or sector shifts. While both are ETFs, the lack of transparency regarding the specific methodology limits the ability to perform a precise comparative risk assessment.

How should beginners interpret the difference in assets under management?

XLE manages $41.3 billion, a massive sum compared to FENY’s $2.1 billion. For a beginner, this means XLE is likely to be more widely held by institutions and retail investors alike, reinforcing its status as a market leader. FENY’s $2.1 billion is respectable but represents a much smaller footprint. Higher assets in XLE generally imply that buying and selling large blocks of shares will have less impact on the share price, offering a degree of safety in liquidity.

How do these energy sector ETFs distribute dividends to investors?

Both FENY and XLE operate as dividend-paying ETFs. They collect dividends from the underlying companies in their portfolios, such as ExxonMobil and Chevron. These funds typically aggregate the cash received over a quarter and distribute it to shareholders as a payment. The 'dividend yield' quoted reflects the annualised value of these past distributions relative to the current fund price. It is important to remember that distributions are not guaranteed and depend entirely on the profitability and capital allocation strategies of the companies held within the fund.

FENY vs XLE

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Fidelity Energy ETF (FENY) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market, offering a neutral view of key differences to help you understand these energy sector ETFs. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FENY

Metric

XLE

0.08%

Expense Ratio

0.08%

2.32%

Dividend Yield

2.47%

$2.14B

Net Assets

$41.31B

106

Holdings

Oct 24, 2013

Inception Date

Dec 16, 1998

–

Index Tracked

–

Equity Energy

Fund Category

Equity Energy

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	FENY	XLE
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	22.03%	23.09%
CVXChevron Corporation	14.37%	17.71%
COPConocoPhillips	6.01%	6.78%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corporation	4.58%	4.83%
VLOValero Energy Corporation	4.56%	4.82%
PSXPhillips 66	4.06%	4.75%
WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.	3.21%	4.35%
EOGEOG Resources, Inc.	2.89%	3.86%
SLBSLB N.V.	2.85%	3.87%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.	2.24%	3.19%

Discover More Comparisons

FENY vs VDE

Compare FENY vs VDE energy ETFs. Review 0.08% vs 0.09% fees, dividends, holdings like XOM and CVX, tracking, net assets and inception dates.

FENY vs IXC

Compare FENY and IXC energy ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, and top holdings like XOM and CVX to analyse key differences.

VDE vs XLE

Compare Vanguard Energy ETF and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund on expense ratios, holdings, dividends and tracking to assess their structural differences.

Investment Analysis

FENY

Pros

FenY maintains a competitive 0.08% expense ratio, aligning costs with larger sector peers.
It holds $2.1bn in assets, offering reasonable scale for Fidelity’s energy exposure.
The portfolio provides a 2.32% dividend yield, reflecting moderate income generation potential.

Considerations

The tracked index is not available, limiting transparency regarding methodology details.
Sector weights are also unavailable, restricting precise portfolio risk assessment capabilities.
With $2.1bn in assets, trading liquidity may be lower than larger alternatives.

XLE

Pros

XLE commands $41.3bn in assets, ensuring deep liquidity and tight trading spreads.
It offers a slightly higher 2.47% dividend yield compared to Fidelity’s counterpart.
Decades of history since 1998 support its role as an established benchmark.

Considerations

The tracked index is not available, restricting clarity on specific rebalancing rules.
Sector weights are unavailable, creating gaps in detailed portfolio composition analysis.
Concentration in energy limits diversification benefits for broader equity portfolios.

About FENY and XLE

FENY (FENY)

The Fidelity Energy ETF, traded under the ticker FENY, offers investors targeted exposure to the global energy sector. As an exchange-traded fund managed by Fidelity Covington Trust, it aims to track the performance of a broad energy index, encompassing over 100 holdings. With a remarkably low expense ratio of just 0.08%, it provides a cost-efficient way to diversify within the energy industry, covering sub-sectors like oil, gas, and consumable fuels. Established in 2013, the fund has accumulated significant net assets, currently standing at approximately USD 2.14 billion. It provides a dividend yield of around 2.32%, offering potential income alongside capital appreciation. This ETF is designed for those seeking to understand the dynamics of the energy market, balancing the potential for growth in a vital global industry with the inherent volatility that often accompanies commodity-linked sectors. Investors should remember that capital is at risk and values can fall.

XLE (XLE)

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) is an exchange-traded fund designed to track the performance of the energy sector in the United States. It holds a diversified basket of companies involved in oil and gas exploration, refining, and distribution. With an expense ratio of just 0.08%, it remains a low-cost option for investors seeking exposure to this specific industry. The fund currently manages approximately USD 41.31 billion in net assets and holds around 24 stocks, providing concentrated yet significant access to major energy players. Since its inception in December 1998, XLE has served as a key tool for those looking to invest in energy trends. While it offers a dividend yield of 2.47%, investors should remember that energy prices can be volatile, causing the fund’s value to rise and fall.

Buy FENY or XLE in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

FENY vs XLE

Fund Snapshot