What is the FDLO ETF and its expense ratio?

FDLO is the Fidelity Covington Trust Low Volatility Factor ETF. Its expense ratio is 0.15%. This fee represents the annual cost of managing the fund, which reduces the net returns an investor receives. For beginners, understanding that even small fees matter over time is essential. The expense ratio is deducted from the fund's assets, impacting the net asset value (NAV) and thus the returns. Keeping fees low is a key principle for long-term wealth accumulation.

What does USMV's inception date tell us?

USMV, or the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor ETF, was established on October 18, 2011. The inception date is the day the fund began operations. This long history of USMV means it has been exposed to various market conditions, providing a more extensive track record for comparison. It helps investors assess its performance over multiple cycles, which is vital for evaluating its consistency and reliability in delivering low-volatility returns.

How does FDLO's net assets value impact investment?

FDLO holds $1.4 billion in net assets. This AUM (Assets Under Management) indicates its size and popularity among investors. A larger fund like FDLO generally offers greater liquidity, which means it can be bought and sold more easily with potentially lower spreads. However, smaller AUM funds may be subject to higher volatility in pricing. Understanding this metric helps gauge how established and accessible the ETF is in the marketplace.

What are the top holdings of USMV?

The top holdings of USMV include NVDA at 1.57%, MSFT at 1.57%, APH at 1.53%, JNJ at 1.52%, CB at 1.50%, WELL at 1.49%, MRK at 1.48%, BRK.B at 1.47%, XOM at 1.47%, and MSI at 1.47%. These stocks represent the fund's core investments. Notably, the weights are relatively balanced. This composition aims to reduce the risk associated with heavy concentration in any single stock, aligning with the fund's minimum volatility strategy. The diversified exposure helps mitigate potential losses during market downturns.

Can a difference in expense ratios impact returns over time?

Yes, even a small difference in expense ratios can significantly impact long-term returns. For instance, both FDLO and USMV have a 0.15% expense ratio. Over many years, fees compound, reducing the investor's net profit. This demonstrates how lower expense ratios, or identical low ratios, favour long-term wealth accumulation. Investors should be aware of how fees are deducted and their potential effect on the final returns, especially when comparing ETFs.

What is the dividend yield for FDLO and USMV?

FDLO has a dividend yield of 1.38%, while USMV offers a dividend yield of 1.42%. Both yields are relatively modest and consistent with large-cap value strategies. A dividend yield represents the annual payout relative to the fund's share price. These yields can help investors understand the income potential of the funds, with both ETFs providing a similar distribution rate, albeit with USMV slightly higher. Distributions may vary based on company payouts.

What is the sector distribution of USMV?

Sector distribution refers to how a fund's assets are spread across various industry sectors. This allocation is crucial for understanding diversification and exposure to different market segments. Unfortunately, the specific sector weights for USMV are not available. This lack of information can make it challenging for investors to fully understand the fund's composition and risks. When sector data is unavailable, relying on top holdings can provide some insight into sector exposure.

Is there significant overlap in FDLO's top holdings with USMV?

There is some overlap in top holdings. The shared top-10 holdings are MSFT and BRK.B. This overlap suggests a similar strategic focus or market exposure between FDLO and USMV. For instance, both hold substantial positions in Microsoft (MSFT) and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B). This commonality can reduce the diversification benefits when combining funds, but it also indicates a shared belief in the value of these specific companies. Investors should consider how much of each holding is represented to gauge true overlap.

How can beginners assess FDLO and USMV for low-volatility investing?

To assess FDLO and USMV, beginners should look at key metrics: expense ratio, net assets, dividend yield, and top holdings. Compare FDLO's $1.4 billion AUM to USMV's $23.5 billion. USMV's longer inception (2011 vs. FDLO's 2016) provides a more extensive historical performance view. Reviewing top holdings for concentration risks and checking dividend yields for income potential are also vital. Remember, the educational disclaimer applies; past performance does not guarantee future results.

FDLO vs USMV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare FDLO (Fidelity Covington Trust Low Volatility Factor ETF) and USMV (Ishares Msci Usa Min Vol Factor Etf). This page analyses fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Both ETFs have 0.15% expense ratios and Large Blend categories, though FDLO has $1.4 billion in net assets compared to USMV's $23.5 billion. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare FDLO (Fidelity Covington Trust Low Volatility Factor ETF) and USMV (Ishares Msci Usa Min Vol Factor Etf). This page analyses fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Both...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FDLO

Metric

USMV

0.15%

Expense Ratio

0.15%

1.38%

Dividend Yield

1.42%

$1.40B

Net Assets

$23.54B

139

Holdings

178

Sep 12, 2016

Inception Date

Oct 18, 2011

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Blend

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	FDLO	USMV
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	6.60%	1.57%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc.	1.74%	1.47%

Discover More Comparisons

SCHD vs USMV

Compare SCHD and USMV on fees, yield and holdings. See how Schwab dividend focus differs from iShares minimum volatility strategy for US large caps.

SPY vs USMV

Compare SPY and USMV ETFs. Review 0.09% vs 0.15% fees, yield differences, top holdings, and liquidity metrics to understand each fund's tracking and risk.

SPLV vs USMV

Compare SPLV and USMV low volatility ETFs. Review the 0.25% vs 0.15% expense ratios, dividend yields, holdings, and market tracking differences factually.

Investment Analysis

FDLO

Pros

The low expense ratio of 0.15% supports efficient long-term wealth accumulation for investors.
With $1.4 billion in net assets, the fund exhibits sufficient size to provide stable liquidity in the market.
The 1.38% dividend yield is consistent with large-cap value strategies that prioritise lower volatility.

Considerations

The high concentration in the top 10 holdings, such as AAPL at 8.49%, can increase specific stock risks.
The fund's inception in 2016 offers a shorter track record compared to older market alternatives.
Information about the specific index tracked is currently not available.

USMV

Pros

The fund's $23.5 billion in net assets ensures high trading liquidity and market confidence.
A 1.42% dividend yield is a reasonable payout for a low-volatility portfolio.
Its 2011 inception date provides a long-term track record in various market conditions.

Considerations

The maximum weight of 1.57% for NVDA limits the portfolio's diversification benefits in the top holdings.
The expense ratio of 0.15% matches FDLO, offering no specific cost advantages for USMV.
Information about the specific index tracked is currently not available.

Related Market Insights

Fed Independence Under Fire: Why Smart Money is Fleeing to Safety

Supreme Court challenge to Fed independence threatens markets. Discover how smart money is investing in defensive assets like consumer staples, utilities, and gold.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

21 January 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Fed Independence Under Fire: Why Smart Money is Fleeing to Safety

Supreme Court challenge to Fed independence threatens markets. Discover how smart money is investing in defensive assets like consumer staples, utilities, and gold.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

21 January 2026

Read Insight

About FDLO and USMV

FDLO (FDLO)

The Fidelity Covington Trust Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is designed for investors seeking exposure to the US large-cap market with an emphasis on stability. By targeting stocks with historically lower volatility, this fund aims to provide a more defensive approach to equity investing. With a low expense ratio of 0.15% and a dividend yield of 1.38%, it offers a cost-effective way to access diversified large-blend holdings. While it seeks to mitigate risk during market downturns, it is important to remember that all investments carry risk, and values can rise as well as fall. This ETF is generally educational for those interested in balancing growth potential with a smoother ride in volatile markets.

USMV (USMV)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Flight to Safety Assets | Fed Uncertainty Overview

A landmark Supreme Court case is set to determine whether the president can fire a Federal Reserve governor, placing the central bank's political independence at a critical juncture. This event could spur market volatility, potentially benefiting safe-haven assets and defensive stocks that investors turn to in times of uncertainty.

Published: 21 January 2026

Explore Basket