What defines a high yield bond ETF like FDHY and SPHY?

High yield bond ETFs invest in corporate debt issued by companies with lower credit ratings than investment-grade firms. These securities typically offer higher interest payments, reflected in the dividend yields of FDHY (6.54%) and SPHY (7.26%), to compensate for greater default risk. Unlike standard government bonds, these ETFs focus on credit spread income rather than duration management. They aim to provide income generation while exposing investors to economic cycles and issuer-specific financial health, making understanding credit risk fundamental when comparing FDHY versus SPHY performance.

How does an expense ratio impact my returns?

The expense ratio is an annual fee deducted from fund assets to cover management and operational costs. SPHY charges 0.05%, while FDHY costs 0.35%, creating a difference of 0.30 percentage points. Although this seems small, fees compound over time, directly reducing net returns. For example, on a theoretical $10,000 investment, the annual fee is $5 for SPHY and $35 for FDHY. Over ten years, the impact of fee drag becomes more pronounced. When comparing funds with similar strategies, lower expense ratios generally preserve more of the portfolio's gross performance.

Why is AUM important for liquidity in ETFs?

Assets Under Management (AUM) indicates the size of a fund and its ability to trade efficiently. SPHY has $12.0 billion in net assets, significantly larger than FDHY’s $619 million. Larger funds typically offer superior liquidity, meaning tighter bid-ask spreads and easier entry or exit at fair prices without impacting the market price. Smaller funds like FDHY may experience wider spreads, especially during volatile markets. While AUM alone does not determine performance quality, it influences transaction costs and how smoothly the ETF tracks its intended benchmark, a key practical consideration for active traders.

How do the dividend yields of FDHY and SPHY compare?

SPHY currently offers a dividend yield of 7.26%, whereas FDHY provides 6.54%. Dividend yield estimates the annual income relative to the share price, but it does not guarantee future distributions. Higher yields can sometimes signal higher perceived risk or specific portfolio positioning in longer-duration or lower-rated credits. Investors should note that yields fluctuate with bond prices and interest rates. Neither yield figure alone confirms a fund’s suitability; understanding the underlying credit quality and duration risks that drive these payouts is essential for evaluating income sustainability in high yield bond markets.

Which fund has a longer track record?

SPHY was launched on Jun 18, 2012, providing approximately seven years of historical performance data. FDHY launched later on Jun 12, 2018, offering about five years of track record. A longer history allows investors to observe how a fund behaves across different market cycles, including periods of rising interest rates or credit stress. While past performance does not predict future results, SPHY’s additional years of data provide more context for evaluating consistency and volatility compared to the relatively newer FDHY, which has less history during diverse economic conditions.

How similar are the top holdings of FDHY and SPHY?

The comparison data indicates that there are none among the listed top ten holdings shared between FDHY and SPHY. This suggests that despite being in the same asset class, their portfolio compositions differ significantly. Distinct holdings imply that each fund’s performance may diverge based on the specific credit events or sector movements affecting their unique bond selections. Without overlapping top positions, diversification benefits from holding both funds might increase compared to funds with identical top holdings, though total portfolio exposure would need careful monitoring to avoid unintended concentration risks.

What does the lack of holdings data mean?

For both FDHY and SPHY, specific top holdings and sector weights are not available in the provided comparison context. This limitation prevents investors from performing precise portfolio analysis or verifying exact credit exposure levels. Typically, transparent ETFs disclose their top ten holdings regularly to help investors assess concentration and duration risk. When such data is unavailable, investors must rely more heavily on fund descriptions, issuer reputation, and historical behaviour rather than granular security-level analysis. This reduces the ability to determine if one fund’s yield comes from higher risk positions than the other.

What are the risks of higher dividend yields?

SPHY’s 7.26% yield exceeds FDHY’s 6.54%, which may reflect higher credit risk or different portfolio structures. In high yield markets, wider spreads often accompany lower-rated issuers or longer durations. While attractive for income, these features can lead to greater price volatility if credit conditions deteriorate. A higher yield is not inherently better; it must be balanced against the fund’s expense ratio and underlying quality. Investors should consider that yield alone does not account for total return, which includes price changes driven by interest rate shifts and default rates within the high yield bond sector.

How does issuer reputation affect fund management?

FDHY is managed by Fidelity, and SPHY by SPDR. Both issuers have established reputations in the investment industry. Fidelity’s FDHY offers exposure to high yield bonds, while SPHY provides a low-cost alternative. Although issuer reputation does not guarantee performance, it often correlates with operational robustness and trading efficiency. Larger, established issuers may have more resources for credit analysis and risk management. However, fees and portfolio composition remain critical factors. The 0.05% expense ratio of SPHY contrasts with the 0.35% ratio of FDHY, highlighting different management approaches and cost structures within the high yield bond category.

What factors should I evaluate before comparing these ETFs?

When comparing FDHY and SPHY, focus on total cost and income consistency. SPHY’s 0.05% expense ratio is significantly lower than FDHY’s 0.35%, preserving more net return. However, FDHY’s yield of 6.54% differs from SPHY’s 7.26%, reflecting varying risk profiles. Since specific index details and top holdings are unavailable, assessing liquidity through net assets ($619 million for FDHY versus $12.0 billion for SPHY) becomes important. Evaluate how each fund’s track record and asset size align with your need for stable income and ease of trading.

Where can I find more detailed information?

As noted, specific index and holdings data are not available on this comparison page. To find current prospectus details, sector weights, and duration metrics, visit the official websites of Fidelity and SPDR. These sources provide comprehensive documentation, including full portfolio holdings lists which are typically updated periodically. Reviewing these materials can help clarify the credit quality and maturity profiles of FDHY and SPHY. Always verify that data is current, as high yield bond portfolios change frequently due to maturities and credit events, impacting yield and risk characteristics significantly over time.

FDHY vs SPHY

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Explore how Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) compares with SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). This page analyses fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Note that holdings data is not available. FDHY has a 0.35% expense ratio versus SPHY’s 0.05%. SPHY offers a 7.26% dividend yield against FDHY’s 6.54%. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FDHY

Metric

SPHY

0.35%

Expense Ratio

0.05%

6.54%

Dividend Yield

7.26%

$619.39M

Net Assets

$11.98B

304

Holdings

1,926

Jun 12, 2018

Inception Date

Jun 18, 2012

–

Index Tracked

–

High Yield Bond

Fund Category

High Yield Bond

SPHY costs about $30.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Investment Analysis

FDHY

Pros

Fidelity’s established issuer reputation and a six per cent dividend yield provide reliable income generation for investors.
The fund offers exposure to a portfolio of high yield bonds that are not shared with other similar ETFs.
Launched in 2018, the fund has established a five year track record of managing credit risk.

Considerations

With assets of only 619 million dollars, the fund may face lower liquidity compared to larger competitors.
The 0.35 per cent expense ratio is significantly higher than many low cost alternatives in this category.
Specific holdings and index details are unavailable, hindering precise portfolio analysis for potential investors.

SPHY

Pros

The extremely low 0.05 per cent expense ratio minimises cost drag and preserves net returns effectively.
With 12.0 billion dollars in assets, SPHY offers superior liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads for traders.
It features a seven year track record since inception, providing valuable data for performance evaluation.

Considerations

Index and holdings data are unavailable, limiting insight into the portfolio's underlying credit structure.
Specific sector weights are not disclosed, preventing clear understanding of potential industry concentration risks.
The listed dividend yield of 7.26 per cent may reflect higher credit risk than more conservative portfolios.

About FDHY and SPHY

FDHY (FDHY)

The Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) is a high yield bond fund launched on 12 June 2018. With net assets of USD 619 million and 304 holdings, it aims to provide income through corporate debt rated below investment grade. Investors often look to this fund for exposure to sectors that may offer higher yields than traditional bonds, though it typically comes with greater credit risk. The expense ratio is 0.35%, which is relatively modest for an actively managed enhanced yield strategy. The fund currently lists a dividend yield of 6.54%. It is essential to understand that high yield bond markets can be sensitive to economic conditions and changes in interest rates. While this fund offers a way to diversify a portfolio with income-generating assets, the value of investments can fluctuate, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

SPHY (SPHY)

The SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide broad exposure to US high yield bonds. With a low expense ratio of 0.05%, it offers investors access to a diversified portfolio containing over 1,900 holdings. The fund currently boasts a dividend yield of 7.26%, reflecting the income potential of high yield markets. Net assets stand at approximately USD 11.98 billion, highlighting significant market participation. Since its inception in 2012, SPHY has tracked the performance of the US high yield bond sector, making it a potentially valuable tool for those seeking income diversification. However, investors should note that bond values fluctuate, and high yield bonds carry greater credit risk than investment-grade alternatives. As with all investments, past performance does not guarantee future results.

Buy FDHY or SPHY in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

FDHY vs SPHY

Fund Snapshot

Investment Analysis

FDHY

Pros

Considerations

SPHY

Pros

Considerations

About FDHY and SPHY

Buy FDHY or SPHY in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What defines a high yield bond ETF like FDHY and SPHY?

How does an expense ratio impact my returns?

Why is AUM important for liquidity in ETFs?

How do the dividend yields of FDHY and SPHY compare?

Which fund has a longer track record?

How similar are the top holdings of FDHY and SPHY?

What does the lack of holdings data mean?

What are the risks of higher dividend yields?

How does issuer reputation affect fund management?

What factors should I evaluate before comparing these ETFs?

Where can I find more detailed information?

Fund Snapshot

About FDHY and SPHY