What are the main differences in investment focus between DTCR and GRID?

DTCR provides pure-play exposure to data centers and digital infrastructure, aligning with cloud computing trends, and has a limited track record since its inception on 27 October 2020. GRID focuses on smart grid and clean energy infrastructure, targeting electrification and sustainability, with a lengthy track record since 17 November 2009. DTCR is highly concentrated with single-stock risk and no available sector weights, while GRID offers diversified holdings across utilities and technology but has no available index tracked or sector weights.

How do the expense ratios of DTCR and GRID affect net returns?

DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50%, which is lower than GRID's 0.56%, resulting in a 0.06 percentage point difference. Over time, the lower fee of DTCR reduces its drag on net returns compared to GRID. However, both funds have elevated expense ratios relative to passive core ETFs, which can compound and reduce net returns. This makes DTCR's fee difference advantageous, but investors should still consider the impact of higher costs on long-term performance.

How do the fund structures of DTCR and GRID differ regarding transparency and track record?

GRID benefits from a lengthy track record since 2009, which supports investor confidence in its index tracking, but its specific index tracked is not available in the provided data. DTCR has a limited track record since its inception on 27 October 2020, introducing uncertainty about long-term performance consistency, and its index tracked is also not available. Neither fund has sector weights available, and both rely on top holdings to provide insight into their portfolios. The 2026 fund data confirms these details without speculating on index specifics.

How do the top holdings of DTCR and GRID differ in terms of diversification and concentration risk?

DTCR exhibits high concentration in its top holdings, such as DLR and AMT, increasing single-stock risk, while its top 10 holdings are distinct and do not overlap with GRID. GRID provides diversification across utilities and technology with names such as ETN and PWR, though its inclusion of NVDA may dilute the pure grid exposure. Neither fund's sector weights are available, so the analysis relies on the listed top holdings and the absence of shared top-10 holdings to interpret the funds' diversification profiles.

How do the dividend yields of DTCR and GRID compare for income-focused investors?

DTCR has a dividend yield of 0.86% compared to GRID's 0.79%, representing a 0.07 percentage point difference based on 2026 data. While DTCR's higher yield may be attractive, its limited track record and elevated 0.50% expense ratio should be considered alongside distribution uncertainty. GRID provides a longer history and broader diversification but carries a higher 0.56% expense ratio and sector-specific constraints. Neither fund's sector weights are available, so the assessment relies on these listed figures without speculation.

How do the net assets of DTCR and GRID influence liquidity and trading efficiency?

GRID has net assets of $11.9 billion, compared to DTCR's $2.1 billion, indicating that GRID has greater scale and liquidity for efficient trading. The higher net assets of GRID are supported by its lengthy track record since 17 November 2009, while DTCR has a limited track record since 27 October 2020. Neither fund's sector weights or index tracking details are available, so the analysis is based on the fund data for net assets, inception dates, and expense ratios to evaluate liquidity.

Which fund offers a more established track record and lower expense ratio?

GRID has a lengthy track record since 2009, supporting investor confidence, while DTCR has a limited track record since 2020. GRID's expense ratio is 0.56%, compared to DTCR's lower 0.50%, making DTCR cheaper. Both funds have elevated expense ratios relative to passive core ETFs, which reduces net returns over time. DTCR has $2.1 billion in net assets and a dividend yield of 0.86%, while GRID has $11.9 billion and a yield of 0.79%. Sector weights and index tracked are not available for either fund, so this comparison relies on the 2026 fund data.

How do secular growth trends in cloud computing and electrification relate to the fund objectives?

DTCR aligns with secular growth in cloud computing and digital infrastructure demand through its data center focus, which supports long-term capital appreciation. GRID targets long-term themes of electrification and sustainability with its smart grid and clean energy infrastructure exposure. These thematic alignments shape the funds' distinct investment strategies, and no sector weights are available, so their market relevance is inferred from the fund objectives and top holdings provided in the 2026 data.

What are the market risks associated with the concentrated holdings of DTCR and the sector-specific nature of GRID?

DTCR carries the risk of high concentration in top holdings such as DLR and AMT, which increases single-stock risk compared to broader market funds. GRID's sector-specific nature limits diversification benefits within equity portfolios and includes non-infrastructure names like NVDA that may dilute pure grid exposure. Neither fund's sector weights or index tracked are available, so the assessment is based on the top holdings and fund structure. DTCR also has a limited track record since 2020, adding uncertainty.

What key considerations should beginners assess when comparing DTCR and GRID?

Beginners should assess the expense ratios of DTCR's 0.50% versus GRID's 0.56% to understand the cost difference, the net assets of $2.1 billion versus $11.9 billion for liquidity, and the dividend yields of 0.86% versus 0.79% for income potential. DTCR has a limited track record since 2020, while GRID has a lengthy history since 2009. The lack of overlap in top 10 holdings, such as DTCR's data centre names versus GRID's utilities and tech, should also be noted. Neither fund's sector weights are available.

What educational disclaimer should investors note when interpreting this ETF comparison?

This ETF comparison is educational content and not financial advice. The data sourced from Yahoo Finance as of 22 September 2026 indicates that DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50%, net assets of $2.1 billion, a dividend yield of 0.86%, and a top holding of DLR. GRID has an expense ratio of 0.56%, net assets of $11.9 billion, a dividend yield of 0.79%, and a top holding of ETN. Both funds have no available sector weights or index tracked. There are no shared top 10 holdings among the listed top holdings, and neither issuer's sector weights are available.

DTCR vs GRID

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

This page compares Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and First Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrs Idx Fund (GRID). Review fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market to understand their distinct infrastructure focuses and key metrics. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

DTCR

Metric

GRID

0.50%

Expense Ratio

0.56%

0.86%

Dividend Yield

0.79%

$2.15B

Net Assets

$11.88B

Holdings

135

Oct 27, 2020

Inception Date

Nov 17, 2009

–

Index Tracked

–

Real Estate

Fund Category

Infrastructure

DTCR costs about $6.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Investment Analysis

DTCR

Pros

Data center focus aligns with secular growth in cloud computing and digital infrastructure demand.
Access to high-growth names such as Equinix and Digital Realty supports long-term capital appreciation potential.
The fund offers pure-play exposure to a niche sector with increasing relevance in modern economies.

Considerations

High concentration in top holdings increases single-stock risk compared to broader market funds.
Expense ratio is elevated relative to passive core ETFs, reducing net returns over time.
Limited track record since inception raises uncertainty about long-term performance consistency.

GRID

Pros

Focus on smart grid and clean energy infrastructure targets long-term themes of electrification and sustainability.
Diversified holdings across utilities, technology, and industrials provide broad exposure to grid modernisation trends.
Established fund with a lengthy track record since 2009 supports investor confidence in index tracking.

Considerations

Sector-specific nature limits diversification benefits within equity portfolios.
Inclusion of non-infrastructure names like NVIDIA may dilute pure grid-focused exposure.
Lower dividend yield than some income-focused utilities funds may reduce appeal for income investors.

Related Market Insights

Green Cities Are a Bet Worth Taking — With Eyes Wide Open

Explore the Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Neme on Nemo. Invest in smart grids and clean energy with fractional shares from $1. Build your future portfolio today.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

20 April 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Green Cities Are a Bet Worth Taking — With Eyes Wide Open

Explore the Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Neme on Nemo. Invest in smart grids and clean energy with fractional shares from $1. Build your future portfolio today.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

20 April 2026

Read Insight

About DTCR and GRID

DTCR (DTCR)

The Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) offers investors exposure to the companies building and operating the physical and digital backbone of the internet. This fund tracks the Solactive Data Center & Digital Infrastructure Index, selecting stocks involved in data centres, digital infrastructure, and related real estate services. With a modest expense ratio of 0.50%, it aims to capture growth trends driven by cloud computing, streaming services, and the expanding data economy. The ETF holds approximately 29 companies and is categorised within the Real Estate sector, reflecting the physical nature of data centres. While it offers a low dividend yield of 0.86%, the primary appeal for many investors is potential capital appreciation from increased demand for digital connectivity. As with any sector-specific ETF, it carries concentration risk and volatility, so it is generally suited for those seeking targeted exposure to digital infrastructure themes rather than a broad market core holding.

GRID (GRID)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Risks to Consider

This investment theme focuses on companies building eco-friendly and resilient urban systems. It captures the transition toward greener cities through smarter energy grids and sustainable materials.

Published: 20 April 2026

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Risks to Consider

This investment theme focuses on companies building eco-friendly and resilient urban systems. It captures the transition toward greener cities through smarter energy grids and sustainable materials.

Published: 20 April 2026

Explore Basket

Buy DTCR or GRID in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

DTCR vs GRID

Fund Snapshot

Investment Analysis

DTCR

Pros

Considerations

GRID

Pros

Considerations

Related Market Insights

Green Cities Are a Bet Worth Taking — With Eyes Wide Open

Related Market Insights

Green Cities Are a Bet Worth Taking — With Eyes Wide Open

About DTCR and GRID

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Risks to Consider

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Risks to Consider

Buy DTCR or GRID in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What are the main differences in investment focus between DTCR and GRID?

How do the expense ratios of DTCR and GRID affect net returns?

How do the fund structures of DTCR and GRID differ regarding transparency and track record?

How do the top holdings of DTCR and GRID differ in terms of diversification and concentration risk?

How do the dividend yields of DTCR and GRID compare for income-focused investors?

How do the net assets of DTCR and GRID influence liquidity and trading efficiency?

Which fund offers a more established track record and lower expense ratio?

How do secular growth trends in cloud computing and electrification relate to the fund objectives?

What are the market risks associated with the concentrated holdings of DTCR and the sector-specific nature of GRID?

What key considerations should beginners assess when comparing DTCR and GRID?

What educational disclaimer should investors note when interpreting this ETF comparison?

Fund Snapshot

About DTCR and GRID

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Risks to Consider

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Risks to Consider

Related Market Insights

Green Cities Are a Bet Worth Taking — With Eyes Wide Open

Related Market Insights

Green Cities Are a Bet Worth Taking — With Eyes Wide Open