What is the main difference between DGRO and DGRW?

DGRO is a Large Value ETF with a 0.08% expense ratio and 1.94% yield, while DGRW is a Large Blend ETF with a 0.28% expense ratio and 1.22% yield. DGRO holds more AAPL and MSFT, and DGRW holds more NVDA and MSFT. Both funds have shared top holdings but differ in asset size and dividend focus.

How do expense ratios affect long-term returns?

A lower expense ratio, like DGRO’s 0.08%, means less cost drag compared to DGRW’s 0.28%. Over time, this difference can compound, potentially enhancing net returns. However, higher fees may justify themselves if DGRW delivers superior performance or lower risk. Investors should weigh fees against other factors like yield and holdings.

What does 'Large Value' vs. 'Large Blend' mean?

DGRO’s 'Large Value' categorisation implies it focuses on large companies with lower valuations, whereas DGRW’s 'Large Blend' suggests a mix of value and growth. This impacts their exposure to sectors and companies, such as DGRO’s inclusion of more traditional value stocks and DGRW’s tech-heavy top holdings.

Which fund has higher liquidity?

DGRO boasts $42.9 billion in net assets, significantly higher than DGRW’s $17.0 billion. This larger asset base suggests DGRO may offer better liquidity, making it easier for investors to buy or sell shares without impacting the market price. Adequate liquidity is crucial for institutional trading.

How do dividend yields differ between DGRO and DGRW?

DGRO has a 1.94% dividend yield, higher than DGRW’s 1.22%. This suggests DGRO’s holdings distribute more dividends relative to their share price, potentially appealing to income-focused investors. DGRW’s lower yield aligns with its higher-growth focus, where companies often retain more earnings for expansion.

How similar are the top holdings of DGRO and DGRW?

Both DGRO and DGRW share AAPL, MSFT, JNJ, and HD in their top 10 holdings. This indicates some overlap in the companies both funds deem important. However, DGRO holds XOM and PG, while DGRW has NVDA and META, showing different sector and company preferences despite the overlap.

What are the implications of index tracking?

Index tracking data is not available for either DGRO or DGRW. Without this, assessing how well each fund replicates its benchmark is difficult. Investors typically rely on fund performance and holdings as proxies for tracking accuracy, but the lack of transparency raises questions about methodology and replication effectiveness.

Are there any risks with the sector weights not being available?

Yes, without sector weight data, it’s challenging to evaluate potential sector concentration risks. Both DGRO and DGRW lack this transparency, making it hard to see if either fund is overweight in certain sectors, which could affect diversification and risk exposure relative to broader market indices.

How do the inception dates of DGRO and DGRW matter?

DGRW was launched on May 22, 2013, while DGRO followed on June 10, 2014. While DGRW has a slightly longer history, the one-year gap is unlikely to significantly impact performance metrics. Investors should focus on current fund characteristics like expense ratios and yields rather than inception dates alone.

What role do top holdings play in fund performance?

Top holdings like DGRO’s XOM and DGRW’s NVDA can significantly influence performance. A fund concentrated in tech stocks may respond differently to market trends than one weighted towards industrials. Investors should consider how holdings align with their investment strategies and risk tolerance.

Why is a lower yield not necessarily bad for DGRW?

DGRW’s 1.22% yield indicates its portfolio prioritises growth over dividends. High-growth firms often reinvest earnings rather than paying dividends, aiming for capital appreciation. This aligns with its 'Quality Dividend Growth' name, where quality and growth are key investment factors, not just income.

Can investors ignore higher expense ratios?

No, higher expense ratios, like DGRW’s 0.28%, should not be ignored. They directly reduce net returns. However, they may offer compensating benefits such as better performance or lower risk. Investors must compare costs with potential advantages, ensuring any fee premium is justified by added value.

DGRO vs DGRW

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth ETF (DGRW). This page examines expense ratios, holdings, dividend yields, and how each fund tracks its market. DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio and 1.94% yield, while DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio and 1.22% yield. Both funds share top holdings like AAPL and MSFT. Index tracking details are not available for either. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

DGRO

Metric

DGRW

0.08%

Expense Ratio

0.28%

1.94%

Dividend Yield

1.22%

$42.93B

Net Assets

$16.96B

396

Holdings

199

Jun 10, 2014

Inception Date

May 22, 2013

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Blend

DGRO costs about $20.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	DGRO	DGRW
AAPLApple Inc.	3.12%	4.39%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	3.03%	7.43%
JNJJohnson & Johnson	2.89%	2.43%
HDThe Home Depot, Inc.	1.98%	2.33%

Discover More Comparisons

DGRO vs VIG

Compare DGRO and VIG to review fees, holdings, and dividends. See how iShares Core Dividend Growth and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation funds differ.

DGRO vs MGV

Compare DGRO and MGV. Analyse fees, yields and holdings. DGRO has 0.08% expense ratio, 1.94% yield. MGV has 0.05% expense ratio, 1.85% yield for research.

DGRO vs HDV

Compare DGRO and HDV on fees, holdings and dividends. Review expense ratios, net assets and top companies to understand fund construction and tracking.

Investment Analysis

DGRO

Pros

Low expense ratio of 0.08% reduces cost drag on long-term returns
Huge $42.9 billion net assets enhance liquidity and trading efficiency
Moderate yield of 1.94% supports dividend growth rather than high payout

Considerations

Tracked index methodology is not available for transparency assessment
No sector weight data provided, limiting visibility on concentration risks
Top holdings lack dominance, which may dilute conviction in specific ideas

DGRW

Pros

Higher quality dividend approach indicated by lower 1.22% yield and growth focus
$17.0 billion net assets provide adequate liquidity for most institutional and retail needs
Substantial $2.06 billion difference in assets versus competitor still supports scale

Considerations

Expense ratio of 0.28% is notably higher than cheaper alternatives
No sector weight data available, complicating assessment of thematic exposures
Tracked index details not provided, raising questions about methodology transparency

About DGRO and DGRW

DGRO (DGRO)

The iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is designed to provide investors with exposure to US companies that have a history of increasing their dividend payouts. This fund targets large-cap equities with sustainable dividend growth strategies rather than just high current yields. With an attractive low expense ratio of 0.08% and substantial net assets of USD 42.93 billion, it offers broad diversification across 396 holdings. The fund’s focus on large value stocks aims to balance income potential with capital appreciation opportunities. Investors should note that while the current dividend yield is approximately 1.94%, payouts are not guaranteed and can fluctuate based on company performance and market conditions. As with any equity investment, the value of shares can rise and fall, meaning returns are not assured. It serves as a general educational example for those interested in dividend-growth strategies within the broader market.

DGRW (DGRW)

The WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth ETF (DGRW) is designed to provide exposure to US companies that combine quality fundamentals with dividend growth potential. This fund focuses on firms with strong earnings and cash flow, aiming to capture total return through both capital appreciation and income. With a moderate expense ratio of 0.28%, it offers an accessible way to diversify across approximately 199 holdings. While the current dividend yield stands at 1.22%, the primary objective is not just immediate income but sustainable growth from established businesses. Investors should note that, like all equity investments, the value of shares can fall as well as rise, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. This ETF suits those interested in long-term themes of quality investing within the US large-cap market.

Buy DGRO or DGRW in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

DGRO vs DGRW

Fund Snapshot