What does an ETF’s expense ratio actually cover?

The expense ratio covers management fees and operational costs. BOTZ has a ratio of 0.68%, while ROBT is 0.65%. This small difference means ROBT keeps more of its assets for investments compared to BOTZ. Over time, these costs reduce returns, making lower ratios beneficial. Beginners should note that even minor differences accumulate, affecting long-term performance. These fees are deducted automatically, impacting the fund’s net asset value, so understanding this helps in evaluating cost efficiency between the two ETFs.

Why do ETFs track indexes, and why is BOTZ’s index not available?

ETFs track indexes to mirror market performance. BOTZ’s tracked index is not available, meaning its benchmark is unspecified. ROBT similarly lacks a listed index. Without this, understanding their exact market exposure is challenging. Beginners should note that tracking indexes guide investment strategies. When indexes are unavailable, it limits transparency regarding how each fund replicates its target market. This lack of specified benchmarks means investors must rely on holdings analysis rather than predefined index structures for comparison.

How does ETF liquidity affect buying and selling?

Liquidity refers to how easily assets can be bought or sold without affecting prices. BOTZ has $3.3 billion in assets, supporting better liquidity, while ROBT’s $766 million might lead to wider spreads. Higher liquidity typically means tighter bid-ask spreads, reducing trading costs. Beginners should understand that liquidity impacts trade execution. With BOTZ’s larger asset base, transactions are likely smoother. ROBT’s smaller size may cause price fluctuations during trades, influencing ease of entry and exit for investors.

What does BOTZ’s dividend yield mean for income investors?

BOTZ’s 0.49% dividend yield is low, limiting income potential. ROBT’s yield is negligible at 0.02%. Neither fund suits income-focused goals, as yields below 1% indicate minimal distributions. Beginners should note that dividends provide passive income, but these ETFs prioritise capital appreciation. Low yields mean reinvestment opportunities are limited, reducing compound growth effects. Comparing yields helps set expectations; BOTZ offers slightly more income but both are unsuitable for investors seeking significant dividend payouts, focusing instead on growth-oriented portfolios.

How concentrated are BOTZ and ROBT in their top holdings?

BOTZ has high concentration, with ISRG at 8.32% and NVDA at 7.80%. ROBT’s largest holding, APPN, is only 2.33%, indicating a more diversified approach. Concentration increases single-stock risk, potentially causing volatility. Beginners should understand that diversified portfolios, like ROBT, spread risk better, while BOTZ’s heavy weighting can amplify gains and losses. Comparing holdings highlights differing risk profiles; BOTZ suits those accepting concentrated tech exposure, whereas ROBT offers broader sector representation with lower individual stock influence.

Why might top holdings differ significantly between these ETFs?

BOTZ and ROBT have no shared top-10 holdings, indicating distinct investment strategies. BOTZ focuses on robotics and AI hardware, reflected in ISRG and NVDA weights. ROBT emphasises software and services, evident in APPN and TEM. Beginners should note that divergent holdings reveal unique market exposures. These differences highlight varied approaches to the AI sector; BOTZ leans towards hardware-intensive firms, while ROBT invests more in software-driven companies. Understanding these distinctions aids in assessing thematic suitability.

Does a longer track record make an ETF better?

BOTZ’s nine-year history provides stability insights, whereas ROBT’s eight years offer a shorter track record. Longer histories generally allow for better performance evaluation across market cycles. Beginners should note that extended records help assess consistency but do not guarantee future outcomes. Both funds show reasonable operational histories, though BOTZ’s additional year offers slightly more data for analysis, enhancing visibility into long-term behaviour and volatility management.

What role does the issuer play in fund management?

Global X manages BOTZ, providing established infrastructure. ROBT’s issuer is unspecified, raising transparency concerns. Beginners should note that reputable issuers often ensure better governance and operational reliability. Global X’s track record supports BOTZ’s credibility, while ROBT’s lack of issuer detail complicates assessment. Issuer reputation influences fund stability, with well-known managers typically offering robust management systems, enhancing investor confidence in fund administration.

How do sector allocations differ without explicit data?

Sector weights are not available for either fund, requiring inference from top holdings. BOTZ’s ISRG and NVDA suggest healthcare technology and semiconductors. ROBT’s APPN and TEM indicate software and genomics. Beginners should note that holdings analysis substitutes for sector data, highlighting thematic trends. Despite missing allocations, distinct holdings reveal differing subsector focuses, aiding in understanding each ETF’s market exposure and potential diversification benefits.

Which ETF is more cost-efficient over time?

ROBT’s 0.65% expense ratio is slightly lower than BOTZ’s 0.68%. This 0.03% difference means ROBT retains marginally more assets, enhancing cost efficiency. Beginners should understand that lower ratios benefit long-term investors by preserving more capital. While small, this difference accumulates over years, making ROBT theoretically more cost-effective. However, other factors like liquidity and concentration must also be considered when evaluating overall fund suitability and cost efficiency.

What should beginners check before choosing between ETFs?

Beginners should verify expense ratios, assets under management, and holdings. BOTZ’s high liquidity contrasts with ROBT’s lower costs but smaller size. Check dividend yields if income is a goal, noting both are low. Compare top holdings to gauge concentration; BOTZ is heavily weighted, while ROBT is diversified. Consider issuer transparency, with Global X’s established reputation versus ROBT’s unknown manager. These factors help in assessing overall fund quality and suitability for your investment style.

BOTZ vs ROBT

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) and First Exchange Traded Vi Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence Robo Etf (ROBT). Explore fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) and First Exchange Traded Vi Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence Robo Etf (ROBT). Explore fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks i...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

BOTZ

Metric

ROBT

0.68%

Expense Ratio

0.65%

0.49%

Dividend Yield

0.02%

$3.34B

Net Assets

$765.61M

103

Holdings

122

Sep 12, 2016

Inception Date

Feb 21, 2018

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

ROBT costs about $3.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

BOTZ vs ROBO

BOTZ vs ROBO: BOTZ holds 103 robotics and AI stocks for 0.68% a year, ROBO holds 90 for 0.95%, a $27 gap per $10,000. Compare holdings and concentration.

BOTZ vs WTAI

Compare BOTZ and WTAI ETFs on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. View expense ratios, yields, top stocks, inception dates and fund details.

BOTZ vs IBOT

Compare BOTZ and IBOT ETFs. Review expense ratios, top holdings, dividend yields and tracking methods to distinguish these robotics funds. Neutral educational.

Investment Analysis

BOTZ

Pros

Global X issuer provides established fund management infrastructure and reputation
Substantial net assets of $3.3 billion enhance liquidity and trading efficiency
Long nine-year track record since inception supports stability and performance visibility

Considerations

Relatively high expense ratio of 0.68 percent increases ongoing investment costs
Moderately low dividend yield of 0.49 percent limits income generation potential
Concentration in top holdings like ISRG and NVDA heightens single-stock risk exposure

ROBT

Pros

Low expense ratio of 0.65 percent provides slight cost efficiency over BOTZ
Eight-year performance history since inception demonstrates reasonable operational track record
Significantly lower concentration in top holdings spreads investment risk across sectors

Considerations

Net assets of $766 million may restrict liquidity and widen trading spreads
Negligible dividend yield of 0.02 percent makes it unsuitable for income investors
Unspecified issuer details raise concerns about management quality and fund transparency

Related Market Insights

Rise Of The Machines: The Robotics Revolution

Explore the robotics revolution. Invest in AI & automation companies transforming industries from healthcare to manufacturing. Discover thematic investment opportunities with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

12 August 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Rise Of The Machines: The Robotics Revolution

Explore the robotics revolution. Invest in AI & automation companies transforming industries from healthcare to manufacturing. Discover thematic investment opportunities with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

12 August 2025

Read Insight

About BOTZ and ROBT

BOTZ (BOTZ)

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a thematic exchange‑traded fund that seeks exposure to companies involved in robotics, automation and artificial intelligence. It holds firms across the value chain — from industrial automation and robotics manufacturers to AI software developers and enabling semiconductors — providing targeted, sector-specific diversification rather than broad market coverage. Traded under the ticker BOTZ, the ETF can suit investors who want concentrated access to technological trends reshaping manufacturing, logistics and data processing. Be aware that thematic ETFs may be more volatile and correlated to a narrow set of industries; returns can rise or fall and are not guaranteed. Investors should consider how BOTZ fits within a wider portfolio, assess liquidity, fees and tax implications, and ensure the theme aligns with their risk tolerance and investment horizon. This is general information and not personalised investment advice.

ROBT (ROBT)

ROBT is a ticker symbol for which publicly available company information could not be identified from the details provided. Before considering any exposure, investors should verify the exact issuer, exchange listing and corporate filings — these determine fundamentals such as revenue, profitability, ownership and regulation. If ROBT represents a small‑cap, newly listed, or over‑the‑counter security, expect higher volatility, thinner liquidity and greater information risk. Useful next steps are to read the issuer’s latest annual and quarterly reports, check regulatory filings (e.g. company registrar or securities regulator) and follow reputable market data sources. This summary is educational only: it does not recommend buying or selling. Values rise and fall, and past performance is not a reliable guide to the future. Ensure any investment fits your objectives, timescale and risk appetite and consider seeking independent financial advice if unsure.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Rise Of The Machines: The Robotics Revolution

This basket focuses on companies at the forefront of the robotics and automation revolution. It provides exposure to both the hardware manufacturers and the software developers driving this technological shift.

Published: 12 August 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Rise Of The Machines: The Robotics Revolution

This basket focuses on companies at the forefront of the robotics and automation revolution. It provides exposure to both the hardware manufacturers and the software developers driving this technological shift.

Published: 12 August 2025

Explore Basket

BOTZ vs ROBT

Fund Snapshot