What are expense ratios and why do they matter?

An expense ratio represents the annual fee charged to manage an investment fund, deducted directly from the fund's assets. It acts as a headwind to returns, meaning higher fees reduce the net performance delivered to investors over time. Comparing these costs is essential for understanding the structural economics of a fund. Lower expense ratios generally allow more of the investment's gross return to remain with the shareholder, whereas higher ratios can significantly erode potential gains, especially in long-term holding periods where compounding effects amplify the cost difference.

How do ETFs differ from mutual funds?

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are investment funds that trade on stock exchanges, much like individual stocks. This allows them to be bought and sold throughout the trading day at market-determined prices. In contrast, mutual funds are typically purchased or redeemed directly with the fund company at the end of the day. ETFs usually have lower expense ratios and greater liquidity. They offer transparent holdings and allow for various trading strategies, including short selling or using limit orders, which provides investors with more flexibility and precision when managing their portfolios.

What does net asset value indicate?

Net asset value (NAV) is the total value of the assets held by a fund minus its liabilities, often reported as net assets in billions. It represents the intrinsic value of each share. For ETFs, the market price can trade slightly above or below NAV, though arbitrage mechanisms typically keep them closely aligned. High net assets, such as those seen in SCHD with $112.8 billion, often suggest strong liquidity and trading depth. BIZD has $1.6 billion in net assets, which is smaller but still provides a stable base for its specific sector exposure.

How do the expense ratios of these two ETFs compare?

There is a stark difference in cost structures between the two funds. BIZD carries a very high expense ratio of 9.69%, while SCHD has an extremely low expense ratio of 0.06%. This creates a cost gap of approximately 9.63 percentage points. The high fee in BIZD is characteristic of funds investing in business development companies, which involve complex credit analysis and active management. Conversely, SCHD's low fee reflects the scale and efficiency of its large-value equity strategy. Investors should consider how such a significant fee difference might impact long-term net returns and the efficiency of the income generated.

What are the top holdings in BIZD and SCHD?

BIZD focuses on business development companies, with top holdings including ARCC (13.72%), OBDC (5.56%), MAIN (5.23%), and BXSL (5.17%). SCHD invests in established large-cap companies, with top holdings such as MRK (4.89%), ABT (4.48%), AMGN (4.28%), and KO (4.27%). The difference in holdings highlights their divergent strategies: BIZD targets credit-based financial entities, while SCHD targets equity-based blue-chip firms. These distinct portfolios serve different investment purposes, with BIZD offering exposure to the BDC market and SCHD providing broad exposure to various traditional sectors like healthcare and consumer staples.

How do the dividend yields of BIZD and SCHD compare?

BIZD provides a high dividend yield of 11.55%, reflecting the income generated by its underlying business development companies. SCHD offers a more moderate yield of 3.11%, typical for a large-value equity fund focused on total return and capital preservation alongside income. The higher yield in BIZD comes with higher costs and potential volatility, as BDCs distribute most of their taxable income. SCHD's lower yield is complemented by a very low expense ratio and a focus on companies with strong fundamental dividend growth potential. Yield alone does not guarantee better outcomes; risk and cost must also be assessed.

Which fund is better for long-term growth?

SCHD is typically associated with long-term growth through capital appreciation and modest income, focusing on large-value stocks like MRK and KO. Its low expense ratio supports long-term compounding. BIZD is associated with high current income rather than growth, given its high dividend yield of 11.55%. However, its significant expense ratio of 9.69% can severely drag on growth potential. The choice depends on whether an investor prioritises steady capital growth with low costs (SCHD) or high immediate cash flow despite high costs and sector concentration (BIZD). Neither fund universally outperforms for all growth objectives.

How do these ETFs track the market differently?

Neither BIZD nor SCHD specifies the exact index tracked in the provided data, making direct index comparison impossible. However, their categories suggest different market exposures. BIZD falls under the Financial category, specifically targeting business development companies, which are highly sensitive to credit cycles and interest rates. SCHD is in the Large Value category, tracking the performance of large-cap value stocks across various sectors. While both are equity-related ETFs, their underlying asset classes differ significantly. Investors should note that without the specific index names, understanding the precise benchmark methodology for each fund is not possible from the current data.

How similar are the top holdings of BIZD and SCHD?

The top holdings of BIZD and SCHD show no overlap among the listed top ten positions. BIZD's top holdings are primarily financial entities such as ARCC and OBDC, while SCHD's top holdings are industrial and consumer staples firms like MRK and KO. This complete lack of shared stocks indicates that the two funds provide entirely different diversification benefits when held together. Adding one to a portfolio containing the other would likely reduce correlation and spread risk across distinct sectors, as they do not compete for the same underlying assets.

What are the sector exposures for these ETFs?

Sector weight data is not available for either BIZD or SCHD in the provided dataset. However, the top holdings give clues. BIZD's holdings are strictly within the business development company sub-sector of the Financials category. SCHD's holdings are diversified across Healthcare (MRK, ABT, AMGN, UNH), Consumer Staples (KO, PG), Energy (CVX, COP), and Telecom (VZ). The absence of explicit sector weights means investors must rely on the listed top holdings to infer the sector concentration, which suggests BIZD is highly concentrated while SCHD is broadly diversified across traditional defensive sectors.

What are the liquidity considerations for these funds?

Liquidity is often correlated with fund size and trading volume. SCHD has massive net assets of $112.8 billion, implying high liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads due to heavy institutional and retail trading. BIZD has $1.6 billion in net assets, which is substantial but significantly smaller. While BIZD likely offers adequate liquidity for most investors, the sheer scale of SCHD provides superior trading depth and potentially lower transaction costs for large orders. Investors should monitor bid-ask spreads and average daily volume to assess real-time liquidity, as net assets are a historical figure and not a guarantee of immediate trading ease.

How do inception dates affect historical data analysis?

BIZD launched in February 2013, while SCHD launched in October 2011. SCHD has a longer operational history, providing more data points across different market cycles. This longer track record allows investors to better assess how SCHD performs during various market regimes, such as the growth-led rallies mentioned in its cons. BIZD, while established, has a shorter history for a dedicated BDC ETF. When comparing funds, a longer inception date generally offers more robust backtesting data, though past performance in one era does not guarantee results in another. Investors must consider the context of the years each fund has been active.

BIZD vs SCHD

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare BIZD (VanEck BDC Income) and SCHD (US Dividend Equity ETF Schwab). Review their fees, holdings and dividends, plus how each fund tracks its market. BIZD carries a 9.69% expense ratio while SCHD is 0.06%, highlighting different cost structures. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

BIZD

Metric

SCHD

9.69%

Expense Ratio

0.06%

11.55%

Dividend Yield

3.11%

$1.58B

Net Assets

$112.77B

Holdings

102

Feb 12, 2013

Inception Date

Oct 20, 2011

–

Index Tracked

–

Financial

Fund Category

Large Value

SCHD costs about $963.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

BIZD vs PBDC

Compare BIZD and PBDC ETFs on fees (9.69% vs 11.77%), dividends, holdings, and tracking. See asset sizes, inception dates, and sector exposure clearly.

BIZD vs SPY

Compare BIZD and SPY on expense ratios, dividend yields, and holdings. BIZD offers high yield with high fees, while SPY provides low-cost market tracking.

FNDX vs SCHD

Compare FNDX and SCHD on fees, holdings, and dividends. FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio and 1.43% yield. SCHD has 0.06% and 3.11%. Review details.

Investment Analysis

BIZD

Pros

The fund's 11.55% dividend yield provides substantial income potential for investors focused on cash flow generation.
With $1.6 billion in net assets, the fund offers a stable size base for BDC-specific exposure.
The strategy targets business development companies, potentially offering diversification beyond conventional large-cap equity indices.

Considerations

The 9.69% expense ratio represents an exceptionally high cost that significantly erodes potential investor returns.
Concentration in the financial sector creates vulnerability to credit cycles and interest-rate sensitivity within the BDC market.
The fund's inception date in February 2013 means it has a shorter operational history compared to some established income ETFs.

SCHD

Pros

The low 0.06% expense ratio ensures that the majority of investment returns remain with the shareholders.
Massive net assets of $112.8 billion provide strong liquidity and trading depth for institutional and retail investors alike.
Top holdings are diversified across healthcare, consumer staples, and energy sectors, reducing single-industry concentration risk.

Considerations

The 3.11% dividend yield is relatively modest compared to dedicated high-income ETFs targeting specific yield objectives.
Although diversified, the large-value focus may underperform during growth-led market rallies where higher-beta stocks dominate.
The fund has been in existence since October 2011, requiring long-term investors to assess performance across various market regimes.

Related Market Insights

Banks in Private Credit: The Trillion-Dollar Lending Revolution

Explore how banks are transforming the trillion-dollar private credit market. Invest in high-yielding BDCs & credit funds with Nemo. Access fractional shares from $1.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Banks in Private Credit: The Trillion-Dollar Lending Revolution

Explore how banks are transforming the trillion-dollar private credit market. Invest in high-yielding BDCs & credit funds with Nemo. Access fractional shares from $1.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About BIZD and SCHD

BIZD (BIZD)

VanEck BDC Income (BIZD) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to Business Development Companies (BDCs) — firms that lend to or invest in smaller, private or mid-market companies. The ETF seeks to deliver current income by holding a diversified mix of publicly listed BDCs and typically using an options overlay (such as covered calls) to enhance distributions. Investors should know BDCs tend to offer higher yields but bring greater credit, liquidity and economic-cycle sensitivity than broad-market equities. BIZD may therefore be more volatile and income dependent on interest-rate and credit environments. Costs, including the fund’s expense ratio and option-writing expenses, can affect returns. This is general educational information, not financial advice: outcomes can vary, principal is at risk, and past performance is not a guide to future results. Consider whether a focus on high income and the specific risks of BDCs fits your objectives and tolerance; speak to a financial professional for personal suitability.

SCHD (SCHD)

SCHD (Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF) is an exchange‑traded fund that aims to provide exposure to high-quality U.S. companies that have a history of paying dividends. Managed by Charles Schwab, the ETF screens for firms with stable earnings, reasonable payout ratios and consistent dividend records, concentrating on large‑cap names across a range of sectors. Investors often use SCHD for income and as a core holding to capture dividend yield with the diversification and liquidity of an ETF. It is designed to be a low‑cost, transparent vehicle, though dividends and share prices can fall and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Suitable for investors seeking income and long‑term total return, it may not fit those focused solely on capital growth or who require guarantees. As with any investment, consider costs, tax treatment and how it fits your wider portfolio before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Banks in Private Credit

This carefully selected group of stocks captures the trillion-dollar shift as traditional banks enter the private lending arena. Our professional analysts have identified key Business Development Companies (BDCs) and specialized funds that stand to benefit from this growing financial trend.

Published: 15 July 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Banks in Private Credit

Published: 15 July 2025

Explore Basket

Buy BIZD or SCHD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

BIZD vs SCHD

Fund Snapshot