Origin Materials vs Loop Industries

Origin Materials and Loop Industries are compared on this page to illustrate their business models, financial performance, and market context. The content provides neutral, accessible information about each company's strategy, operations, and market position, designed to inform readers without investment advice. Educational content, not financial advice.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

ORGN

Metric

LOOP

$29.52M

Market Cap

$53.65M

351.88%

Potential Profit

299.12%

Buy

Analyst Rating

Strong Buy

Investment Analysis

Origin Materials

ORGN

Pros

Origin Materials operates a proprietary biomass conversion platform that can produce carbon-negative chemicals from plant-based sources, a potential growth driver amid increasing environmental regulation.
The company has a very low debt-to-equity ratio of about 1.1%, indicating limited leverage and relatively stable financial structure.
Its beta of approximately 0.86 suggests the stock is less volatile than the broader market, offering a potentially lower risk profile relative to peers.

Considerations

Origin Materials is currently unprofitable with a very large net loss of around $89 million and a net profit margin deeply negative at over -312%.
The stock has experienced steep depreciation with a one-year decline of nearly 60% and a five-year decline exceeding 90%, indicating significant investor sell-off.
Revenue is modest at about $28.7 million with gross margins barely above 1%, flagging challenges in scaling profitably and operational efficiency.

Loop Industries

LOOP

Pros

Loop Industries operates in the sustainable materials sector, which benefits from long-term environmental trends and regulatory support.
The company has shown some revenue growth, leveraging technology to recycle plastic waste into high-quality polymers, appealing to eco-conscious markets.
Loop’s reported beta is moderate, helping it maintain a balanced risk profile compared to more volatile peers in the materials sector.

Considerations

Loop Industries has faced execution risk with delays in commercial scaling and challenges in achieving consistent profitability.
The company's financials show persistent net losses and limited cash flow generation, raising concerns about liquidity and the need for external funding.
Loop is exposed to cyclicality in raw material costs and market adoption rates for recycled plastics, which may affect earnings stability.

About The Companies

Origin Materials (ORGN)

Origin Materials is a carbon-negative materials company aiming to lead the world’s transition to sustainable materials. It has developed a proprietary platform technology that converts carbon from non-food biomass, such as wood residue, into versatile, eco-friendly intermediate chemicals. These building-block chemicals, including chloromethylfurfural (CMF), can be used to manufacture a wide variety of products, from clothing and plastics to car parts, tyres, and adhesives. By offering a renewable alternative to petroleum-based resources, Origin Materials seeks to help decarbonise supply chains and create a more circular economy. As a company in a high-growth sector, its performance may attract investors interested in environmental technology, but it's important to remember that the value of investments can go down as well as up.

Loop Industries (LOOP)

Loop Industries (LOOP) is a small-cap company developing chemical recycling technology that breaks polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics and polyester fibre into their original building blocks for reuse. The firm aims to enable a circular plastics economy by licensing its depolymerisation process to brand partners and converters rather than operating large-scale manufacturing itself. Investors should note the company’s modest market capitalisation (around $74m) and the typical risks of early-stage technology plays: commercial scale-up, customer adoption, regulatory shifts and funding requirements can all materially affect outcomes. Historical volatility and funding cycles are common in this sector. This summary is general educational information and not personalised investment advice; Loop may suit investors who accept high volatility and execution risk, while conservative investors may find it unsuitable.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Buy ORGN or LOOP in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Origin Materials vs Gold Resource

Origin Materials vs Trinseo

Tredegar vs Loop Industries

Tredegar vs Loop Industries: a comparison

Origin Materials vs Loop Industries

Comparison Snapshot

Investment Analysis

Origin Materials

Pros

Considerations

Loop Industries

Pros

Considerations

About The Companies

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Buy ORGN or LOOP in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

Origin Materials vs Gold Resource

Origin Materials vs Trinseo

Tredegar vs Loop Industries

Frequently asked questions

What do Origin Materials and Loop Industries do, and how do their business models differ?

Why is revenue scale and gross margin important when comparing these stocks?

What does beta tell us about these stocks’ price movements?

What does a large net loss and negative net profit margin indicate for Origin Materials?

How should one interpret Loop Industries’ revenue growth in the context of profitability?

What risks are associated with limited cash flow and external funding needs?

How do debt and leverage play into the comparison between these stocks?

How might environmental trends and regulation affect the market outlook for these stocks?

What role do raw material costs and pricing play in earnings stability for these stocks?

How should a reader interpret the data when comparing these two stocks side by side?

Is this content investment advice, and how should it be used?

Comparison Snapshot

About The Companies