Loews vs FTAI Aviation

Loews Corporation and FTAI Aviation Ltd are compared to help readers understand how their business models, financial performance, and market context differ. This page presents neutral analysis of strategy, operations, risks, and opportunities, with a clear, accessible explanation for readers seeking a balanced view. Educational content, not financial advice.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

Metric

FTAI

$21.14B

Market Cap

$28.75B

N/A

Potential Profit

-19.20%

N/A

Analyst Rating

Buy

Investment Analysis

Loews

Pros

Loews Corporation reported a 25% year-on-year rise in Q3 2025 net income to $504 million, driven by strong underwriting at CNA Financial and Boardwalk Pipelines expansion.
The company is executing a significant share repurchase programme, having bought back 5.7 million shares year-to-date, signalling capital return and confidence in intrinsic value.
Boardwalk Pipelines is advancing major capacity projects, including the Texas Gateway, adding 1.5 Bcf/d and increasing exposure to growing US natural gas infrastructure demand.

Considerations

Loews’ revenue and earnings growth remain sensitive to insurance underwriting cycles, catastrophe losses, and volatile investment income, introducing periodic earnings volatility.
The dividend yield is relatively low at 0.25%, limiting income appeal compared to peers in the financial and energy sectors.
Portfolio concentration in insurance and energy infrastructure exposes the company to regulatory shifts, environmental risks, and macroeconomic headwinds in these sectors.

FTAI Aviation

FTAI

Pros

FTAI Aviation benefits from a focused strategy on CFM56 engine leasing, a high-utilization asset class with stable cash flows and potential for asset appreciation.
The company maintains a robust current ratio of 3.95, indicating strong short-term liquidity to manage obligations and invest in growth opportunities.
FTAI stock has delivered significant price appreciation over the past year, reflecting market optimism about its niche position in aviation leasing and aftermarket services.

Considerations

FTAI Aviation’s return on equity is deeply negative, signalling persistent challenges in translating revenue into sustainable shareholder profitability.
The stock’s elevated price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios suggest a premium valuation that may not be justified by current earnings or book value.
Reliance on a single engine type (CFM56) and the cyclical nature of aviation leasing expose FTAI to technological obsolescence and industry downturns.

About The Companies

Loews (L)

Loews Corporation is a diversified holding company, meaning it owns a majority stake in several distinct businesses operating in different industries. This structure gives investors exposure to a range of sectors through a single stock. Its primary subsidiaries include CNA Financial, a major commercial property and casualty insurance provider; Boardwalk Pipelines, which transports and stores natural gas and other hydrocarbons; and Loews Hotels & Co, a chain of luxury hotels. Beyond these core areas, Loews also has a corporate segment that includes other investments. This diversified model means the company's overall performance is a blend of the successes and challenges within each of its operating sectors. It is important to remember that with any investment, returns are not guaranteed and values can fall as well as rise.

FTAI Aviation (FTAI)

FTAI Aviation Ltd is an aircraft leasing and financing company that owns and manages a fleet leased to airlines, offering investors exposure to the aviation sector without direct airline ownership. It generates revenue primarily from lease rentals, sale-leaseback arrangements and asset disposals. The business is sensitive to airline demand cycles, aircraft values, and credit quality of lessees; macro factors such as global travel volumes, fuel prices and interest rates can affect performance. With a market capitalisation around $17.7 billion (provided), FTAI’s returns reflect lease pricing, fleet utilisation and capital structure decisions. Investors should watch fleet composition, contract durations, lessee credit profiles and funding costs. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results; values can rise or fall. This summary is for general educational purposes and not personal financial advice — investors should assess suitability and consider seeking regulated advice before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Buy L or FTAI in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Loews vs Carlyle

Loews vs Carlyle: comparing business models.

Loews vs Principal Financial

Loews vs Principal Financial: a quick comparison

Loews vs KeyCorp

Loews vs KeyCorp: A stock comparison

Loews vs FTAI Aviation

Comparison Snapshot

Investment Analysis

Loews

Pros

Considerations

FTAI Aviation

Pros

Considerations

About The Companies

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Buy L or FTAI in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

Loews vs Carlyle

Loews vs Principal Financial

Loews vs KeyCorp

Frequently asked questions

What does it mean to compare two stocks from different sectors in a single page?

Why are profitability metrics like ROE and revenue growth presented for each stock?

How should I interpret 'cons' and 'pros' lists in this comparison?

What does a company’s dividend yield tell me in this page’s context?

How important is price appreciation versus earnings fundamentals for each stock?

What does a high price-to-earnings or price-to-book ratio signal in this comparison?

How do sector-specific risks affect the two stocks differently?

Why is diversification across sectors relevant when comparing these two stocks?

How should a reader use this page to form a neutral view without financial advice?

What should I look at first when starting a stock comparison like this?

What is the purpose of presenting a neutral, educational analysis for these stocks?

Comparison Snapshot

About The Companies