CrossAmerica Partners vs Nabors

CrossAmerica Partners and Nabors Industries Ltd are compared on this page to outline their business models, financial performance, and market context. The aim is to present a neutral, accessible overview of how the two companies operate and where they stand within their sectors. This page looks at strategy, results, and industry positioning to offer a clear, educational view. Educational content, not financial advice.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

CAPL

Metric

NBR

$838.65M

Market Cap

$906.14M

N/A

Potential Profit

-30.08%

Hold

Analyst Rating

Hold

Investment Analysis

CrossAmerica Partners

CAPL

Pros

CrossAmerica Partners LP reported increased net income of $13.6 million in Q3 2025, up from $10.7 million in Q3 2024, showing improving profitability.
Distributable cash flow rose to $27.8 million in Q3 2025, indicating strong cash generation capabilities to support distributions and growth.
The company has successfully optimized its portfolio with $22 million in asset sales to reduce debt and improve leverage from 4.36x to 3.56x.

Considerations

Revenue declined by 7.68% in 2024 to $3.78 billion, and net income dropped over 50% that year, reflecting challenges in top-line growth and profitability.
Gross profit for both wholesale and retail segments decreased year-over-year in Q3 2025, signaling margin pressures in core operations.
The stock currently trades at a relatively high dividend yield of over 10%, which may indicate underlying operational or market risks affecting valuation.

Nabors

NBR

Pros

Nabors Industries Ltd. operates globally in oilfield services with diversified contracts which can provide resilience against regional market fluctuations.
The company has a wide range of drilling equipment and technology solutions, positioning it competitively in an evolving energy services market.
Recent trading volumes are robust, reflecting healthy market interest and liquidity for investors considering entry or exit.

Considerations

Nabors faces cyclicality and commodity price sensitivity inherent in oil and gas drilling services, which can cause volatile financial performance.
The stock price has shown wide 52-week range volatility from $23.27 to $86.10, indicating heightened risk and market uncertainty.
Operational execution risks remain due to ongoing energy transition pressures and the capital-intensive nature of drilling rig upgrades and maintenance.

About The Companies

CrossAmerica Partners (CAPL)

CrossAmerica Partners LP is a key player in the US motor fuel industry. Structured as a Master Limited Partnership (MLP), its business is split into two main areas: Wholesale and Retail. The Wholesale segment is responsible for distributing motor fuel to a large network of lessee dealers and independent dealers across 34 states. It handles well-known brands like Exxon, Shell, and BP. The Retail segment covers the direct sale of motor fuel and convenience items at sites it operates. The company owns or leases around 1,100 sites, showcasing a significant real estate component to its operations. Investors might look at CrossAmerica for its role in the energy supply chain and its business model that combines fuel distribution with convenience retail. As with any investment, it's important to remember that past performance is not indicative of future results and capital is at risk.

Nabors (NBR)

Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) is a global provider of drilling services and advanced drilling technologies to the oil and gas industry. The company operates drilling rigs and offers automated drilling systems, well construction services and related technologies that aim to improve efficiency and reduce costs for exploration and production customers. Nabors’ performance is closely tied to oil and gas activity levels and commodity prices, making it cyclical and sensitive to industry capital spending. The business is capital-intensive and exposed to regulatory, environmental and operational risks typical of energy services firms. Investors may watch its fleet utilisation, contract backlog, technological differentiation and cost control as indicators of recovery or strain. Given its market capitalisation and sector cyclicality, Nabors can suit investors who understand higher volatility and who seek exposure to upstream activity, but it may be less appropriate for those seeking steady income or low-risk holdings. This is educational content, not personalised financial advice.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Buy CAPL or NBR in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

CrossAmerica Partners vs Nabors

Comparison Snapshot

Investment Analysis

CrossAmerica Partners

Pros

Considerations

Nabors

Pros

Considerations

About The Companies

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Buy CAPL or NBR in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

CrossAmerica Partners vs Nordic American Tankers

CrossAmerica Partners vs Core Laboratories

CrossAmerica Partners vs TXO Partners

Frequently asked questions

Comparison Snapshot

About The Companies

CrossAmerica Partners vs Nabors

Comparison Snapshot

Investment Analysis

CrossAmerica Partners

Pros

Considerations

Nabors

Pros

Considerations

About The Companies

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Buy CAPL or NBR in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

CrossAmerica Partners vs Nordic American Tankers

CrossAmerica Partners vs Core Laboratories

CrossAmerica Partners vs TXO Partners

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between profit and cash flow in these stock comparisons?

How should I interpret leverage changes like the 4.36x to 3.56x improvement for CrossAmerica Partners?

Why do high dividend yields sometimes signal risk as well as income potential?

What does revenue decline mean for a stock comparison like this?

How should I compare profitability between CrossAmerica Partners and Nabors?

What role does cash flow play in assessing these stocks’ investment potential?

What does a wide 52-week range indicate about Nabors’ stock relative to CrossAmerica Partners?

How do cyclicality and commodity exposure affect the two stocks in this comparison?

What should I look at besides these pros and cons when evaluating these stocks?

Is there a simple takeaway from comparing CrossAmerica Partners and Nabors?

What is meant by ‘industry positioning’ in this context?

How should I interpret the educational notes on this page?

Comparison Snapshot

About The Companies