Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income
This page compares Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund, outlining their business models, financial performance indicators, and the market context in which each operates. The aim is to present clear, neutral information to aid understanding, with no suggestion of recommendations. Educational content, not financial advice.
This page compares Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund, outlining their business models, financial performance indicators, and the mark...
Investment Analysis
Pros
- The fund delivers a solid current income with an annualized distribution rate around 7.43% of NAV, supported by consistent dividend payments.
- It has demonstrated strong historical performance, showing a five-year average annual total return exceeding 10%.
- The portfolio focuses on income-producing U.S. real estate securities, primarily REITs, which provides exposure to a specialized sector with potential for income and capital appreciation.
Considerations
- The reliance on real estate sector securities exposes the fund to sector-specific risks, including real estate market fluctuations and interest rate sensitivities.
- A significant portion of distributions comes from capital gains rather than net investment income, which may affect tax efficiency for some investors.
- Valuation metrics like P/E and price-to-book ratios are not clearly defined, limiting transparency in relative valuation assessments.
Pros
- The fund invests in a diversified mix of domestic and foreign dividend-paying stocks, reducing concentration risk compared to sector-specific funds.
- It employs tax-managed strategies which can enhance after-tax returns by minimising taxable distributions where possible.
- The fund targets both dividend income and capital appreciation, providing a balanced investment approach to equity income.
Considerations
- Recent market price trends show a decline, suggesting potential near-term price volatility or investor caution.
- Dividend yield is generally lower compared to some high-yield real estate income funds, possibly limiting immediate income potential.
- Exposure to global equities introduces currency and geopolitical risk, which may increase fund volatility and affect returns.
Buy RQI or ETY in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs Pathward Financial
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs Pathward Financial
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs Gabelli Equity Trust
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs Gabelli Equity Trust
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund vs BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust