CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs PIMCO Access Income Fund
CBRE Global Real Estate Income and PIMCO Access Income Fund are compared on this page to examine their business models, financial performance, and the market context in which they operate. The presentation remains neutral and accessible to support understanding, without guidance or recommendations. Educational content, not financial advice.
CBRE Global Real Estate Income and PIMCO Access Income Fund are compared on this page to examine their business models, financial performance, and the market context in which they operate. The present...
Investment Analysis
Pros
- The fund provides a high current income with an annualised distribution rate around 14.6% to 16.6%, appealing to income-seeking investors.
- Global diversification across developed markets and multiple real estate sectors helps mitigate portfolio risk and enhances income consistency.
- Strong operational backing from CBRE Group, which reported robust Q2 2025 financial results including 71% GAAP EPS growth and $1.3 billion free cash flow.
Considerations
- A significant portion of recent distributions (up to 88%) has been from return of capital rather than net investment income, which may affect long-term sustainability.
- The fund experienced a negative cumulative total return of -7.74% in 2024 and a negative 1-year total return of -10.12% as of September 2025.
- High expense ratio of approximately 3.88% could weigh on net returns compared to lower-cost alternatives.
Pros
- PIMCO Access Income Fund employs a dynamic asset allocation strategy across multiple sectors, providing flexibility in changing market conditions.
- Focus on current income as primary objective aligns with investors seeking regular income distributions.
- Managed by PIMCO, a reputable and experienced asset manager known for strong fixed income and income-oriented strategies.
Considerations
- Limited recent specific fund performance data publicly available, increasing uncertainty about near-term returns and volatility.
- Exposure to multiple sectors and global markets may introduce complexity and execution risks compared to focused real estate income funds.
- Potential sensitivity to interest rate changes and credit market conditions could negatively impact income and capital values.
Buy IGR or PAXS in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons
CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Heritage Insurance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Heritage Insurance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends
CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends
CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Vinci Compass
CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Vinci Compass