

Busey vs Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
Busey and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund are featured on this page to compare business models, financial performance, and market context. The comparison provides neutral, accessible explanations of how each organisation operates, generates revenue, and positions itself within the energy infrastructure sector. Educational content, not financial advice.
Busey and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund are featured on this page to compare business models, financial performance, and market context. The comparison provides neutral, accessible explana...
Investment Analysis

Busey
BUSE
Pros
- First Busey Corp operates primarily in retail and commercial banking across multiple U.S. states, providing geographic diversification in Illinois, Missouri, Florida, and Indiana.
- The company maintains a reasonable valuation with a price/earnings ratio of around 10.87 and price/book ratio near 1.00, indicating fair market pricing relative to earnings and book value.
- It has a steady profitability profile with a normalized return on equity close to 8.78%, demonstrating moderate efficiency in generating shareholder returns.
Considerations
- Return on assets is low at approximately 0.99%, suggesting limited asset efficiency compared to peers in the banking sector.
- The revenue is heavily dependent on the banking segment, which generates the vast majority of income, indicating concentration risk in earnings sources.
- Limited available liquidity metrics such as quick ratio and current ratio make it difficult to fully assess short-term financial health and risk.
Pros
- Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund offers a high dividend yield close to 7.87%, attractive for income-focused investors.
- The fund provides diversified exposure to North American energy infrastructure, including midstream, utilities, and renewable sectors, benefiting from broad energy demand trends.
- It invests primarily in energy companies with stable cash flows underpinned by long-term contracts and benefits from strong competitive moats and high barriers to entry.
Considerations
- As a closed-end fund, KYN has a relatively high effective expense ratio (reported around 5.18% to 16%), which could erode net returns for investors.
- The fund’s performance and income are sensitive to the energy sector’s cyclicality and commodity price fluctuations, introducing volatility risk.
- Complexity in distributions includes return of capital components, requiring investors to assess tax implications and sustainability of payouts carefully.
Buy BUSE or KYN in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons


Busey vs Enterprise Financial
Busey vs Enterprise Financial


Busey vs Stock Yards Bancorp
Busey vs Stock Yards Bancorp: A comparison


Busey vs Hilltop Holdings
Busey vs Hilltop Holdings