Boston Omaha vs JELD-WEN

Boston Omaha and JELD-WEN are presented here to compare business models, financial performance, and market context. This page outlines how each company creates value, the scale of operations, and the factors that influence their positioning within the industry. The content is neutral and accessible to readers seeking a balanced overview. Educational content, not financial advice.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

BOC

Metric

JELD

$384.05M

Market Cap

$251.16M

1.89%

Potential Profit

-9.84%

Hold

Analyst Rating

Hold

Investment Analysis

Boston Omaha

BOC

Pros

Boston Omaha operates diversified business segments including outdoor billboard advertising, broadband services, surety insurance, and asset management, reducing reliance on a single source of revenue.
The company has a relatively low beta of around 0.99, indicating moderate stock price volatility compared to the market.
Positive analyst sentiment with a majority rating it as a buy and price targets suggesting significant upside potential around 53% to 99%.

Considerations

Despite decent revenues over $111 million, Boston Omaha’s net income remains very low at under $1 million, indicating limited current profitability.
Its trailing price-to-earnings ratio is extremely high (above 500), reflecting very low earnings and potential overvaluation concerns.
The company operates in cyclically sensitive sectors like outdoor advertising and broadband, which could be impacted by economic downturns and regulatory changes.

JELD-WEN

JELD

Pros

JELD-WEN is a large company with substantial revenue around $3.43 billion, which supports scale advantages in wood, metal, and composite building products manufacturing.
The company has a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 16.73, suggesting anticipated return to profitability and a more reasonable valuation multiple.
Presence in multiple geographic markets (North America and Europe) provides diversified exposure in the residential and non-residential building sectors.

Considerations

JELD-WEN reported significant net losses recently, exceeding $350 million, reflecting ongoing operational and profitability challenges.
Its stock is highly volatile with a beta of 1.71, indicating above-average market risk and sensitivity to economic cycles.
The company faces pressure from cyclicality in the housing market and raw material costs, which could weigh on earnings and cash flow stability.

About The Companies

Boston Omaha (BOC)

Boston Omaha Corporation is a holding company with a diverse portfolio of businesses across several distinct sectors. Its primary operations include outdoor billboard advertising through Link Media Holdings (LMH), which has a strong presence across many US states. The company is also active in the telecommunications space, providing high-speed broadband services to communities via Boston Omaha Broadband (BOB). Another significant arm is its surety insurance and brokerage business, managed under General Indemnity Group (GIG). Finally, Boston Omaha Asset Management (BOAM) oversees its asset management activities. This multi-faceted structure means the company's performance is driven by trends in advertising, internet services, insurance, and investment management. An investment in Boston Omaha is a stake in this collection of varied businesses, and its value can rise or fall depending on the success of each segment.

JELD-WEN (JELD)

JELD‑WEN Holding, Inc. (ticker JELD) is a global manufacturer of windows and doors serving new‑build and repair & remodel markets. The company sells through a portfolio of brands and an international network of manufacturing sites and distribution channels. Revenue and margins tend to be cyclical and closely tied to housing starts, renovation activity and broader macroeconomic and interest‑rate conditions. JELD‑WEN has pursued operational improvements and portfolio adjustments, but it carries leverage that can limit financial flexibility during downturns. Commodity and energy costs, supply‑chain dynamics and competition from other manufacturers and large retailers can also affect profitability. With a market capitalisation around $407 million, it sits in the smaller‑cap industrial space and may have lower liquidity and higher share‑price volatility than larger peers. This is general educational information, not personalised advice; investors should consider their own objectives, risk tolerance and consult a financial adviser before acting.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Buy BOC or JELD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Boston Omaha vs Zumiez

Boston Omaha vs Zumiez: Company comparison

Boston Omaha vs Honest

Boston Omaha vs Dine Brands

Boston Omaha vs Dine Brands: a stock comparison

Boston Omaha vs JELD-WEN

Comparison Snapshot

Investment Analysis

Boston Omaha

Pros

Considerations

JELD-WEN

Pros

Considerations

About The Companies

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Buy BOC or JELD in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

Boston Omaha vs Zumiez

Boston Omaha vs Honest

Boston Omaha vs Dine Brands

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary way to compare two stocks like Boston Omaha and JELD-WEN?

How does diversification influence a stock’s risk and return profile?

What does beta tell a reader about Boston Omaha and JELD-WEN?

How should forward price-earnings (P/E) ratios be interpreted for these two stocks?

What is the significance of revenue scale in the comparison?

How should recent profitability and losses influence interpretation?

How do cyclicality and sector exposure affect each stock’s risk?

What role do geographic exposures play in the comparison?

How should a beginner approach reading these valuation metrics?

Is there any final caution a reader should keep in mind when comparing these two stocks?

Comparison Snapshot

About The Companies