Cohen & Steers Infrastructure FundGCM Grosvenor

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs GCM Grosvenor

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund and GCM Grosvenor are compared on this page to illuminate business models, financial performance, and market context. The content presents objectives, strategies, an...

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Inflation Hedge Basket

Inflation Hedge Basket

Looking to protect your money from rising prices? This collection features companies that own real, physical assets from gold mines to global infrastructure. Professional analysts have selected these stocks specifically for their ability to maintain and potentially increase in value during inflationary periods.

Published: June 17, 2025

Explore Basket

Investment Analysis

Pros

  • The fund invests primarily in value stocks of infrastructure companies across all market capitalizations, providing broad exposure to the infrastructure sector.
  • It focuses on total return with an emphasis on income, suitable for investors seeking both growth and income from infrastructure assets.
  • Recently completed one of the largest transferable rights offerings for a closed-end fund, raising fresh capital to pursue attractive investment opportunities and growth potential.

Considerations

  • Trades at a price implying zero P/E and other valuation metrics, which may reflect structural valuation challenges or market pricing inefficiencies.
  • Closed-end fund structure can result in shares trading at discounts to net asset value, introducing price volatility unrelated to underlying asset performance.
  • Expense ratio is relatively high at around 3.86%, which may reduce net returns compared to lower-cost infrastructure investment options.

Pros

  • GCM Grosvenor is a global alternative asset management firm offering investors access to diversified alternative investment opportunities.
  • Has expertise in managing a broad range of alternative asset classes, including private equity, real assets, and credit, which may provide diversified growth drivers.
  • Strong market position with a focus on serving institutional clients seeking allocations to alternatives, benefiting from increased demand for non-traditional investments.

Considerations

  • Exposure to alternative assets entails higher complexity and may involve greater risk and illiquidity compared to traditional investments.
  • Performance and revenue can be sensitive to fundraising cycles and investor sentiment in the alternatives market.
  • Operating in a competitive industry with pressure on fees and increasing regulatory scrutiny that could impact margins and operational flexibility.

Why invest with Nemo?

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure FundSixth Street Specialty Lending

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs Sixth Street Specialty Lending

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs Sixth Street Specialty Lending

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure FundFirst Financial

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs First Financial

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs First Financial

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure FundSiriusPoint

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs SiriusPoint

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund vs SiriusPoint

Frequently asked questions