Church & Dwight vs Performance Food Group

Church & Dwight and Performance Food Group are examined on this page to compare business models, financial performance, and market context. The aim is to present objective information that helps readers understand each company’s strategy, operations, and position within its sector. The content is designed to be neutral and accessible, with clear explanations that support informed exploration. Educational content, not financial advice.

About The Companies

Church & Dwight (CHD)

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is a US-based consumer goods company known for household and personal-care brands such as ARM & HAMMER, Trojan, OxiClean and First Response. The business sells everyday staples across retail, e-commerce and international channels, supporting relatively predictable demand compared with cyclical sectors. With a market capitalisation around $21.4bn, Church & Dwight combines organic growth from product innovation and marketing with periodic revenue contributions from acquisitions. Investors often watch its gross margins, brand strength, distribution partnerships and cost control as indicators of resilience. The company has a history of returning cash via dividends and share buybacks, but inflation, input-cost swings and changing consumer preferences can affect results. This summary is educational only, not personalised financial advice; values can rise or fall and past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. Consider your goals, diversification and risk tolerance before acting.

Performance Food Group (PFGC)

Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is a US-based foodservice distributor supplying restaurants, healthcare, education and hospitality clients. It operates national and regional distribution networks, offers private-label products and provides supply-chain services to a broad customer base. Revenue growth has been supported by acquisitions, expanded customer relationships and rising foodservice demand; margins depend on purchasing scale, pricing power and logistics efficiency. Key sensitivities include commodity and fuel prices, labour costs, customer concentration and economic cycles that affect dining out. With a market capitalisation of about $15.86bn, PFGC sits at mid-cap scale in a competitive, low-margin industry. Investors should watch sales growth, gross margin trends, free cash flow conversion and leverage. This summary is for general educational purposes only and not personal financial advice. Shares can fall as well as rise; consider your investment objectives and risk tolerance before acting.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

CHD

Metric

PFGC

$20.07B

Market Cap

$14.81B

18.46%

Potential Profit

24.05%

Hold

Analyst Rating

Buy

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

These beauty stocks represent leading companies in skincare, haircare, and makeup. Carefully selected by our analysts, these investments offer exposure to a growing global industry expected to reach $716.6 billion by 2025.

Published: May 21, 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

Published: May 21, 2025

Explore Basket

Investment Analysis

Church & Dwight

CHD

Pros

Church & Dwight reported 5% year-on-year revenue growth in Q3 2025, beating analyst expectations, reflecting solid sales momentum.
The company has a diverse portfolio of well-known brands like Arm & Hammer and Trojan, supporting resilient market demand.
Analysts forecast a potential stock price increase of around 16-18% over the next year, indicating confidence in growth prospects.

Considerations

The stock has declined about 14% in 2025 so far, reflecting investor concerns about consumer demand and broader market volatility.
Valuation multiples such as P/E and price-to-sales ratios are significantly higher than sector averages, suggesting the stock may be richly priced.
Return on assets and invested capital trail some competitors, indicating potential challenges in operational efficiency and profitability.

Performance Food Group

PFGC

Pros

Performance Food Group controls a broad foodservice distribution network benefiting from diversified customer base and scale advantages.
The company has a sizeable market capitalization around $15 billion, reflecting solid investor interest and financial resources.
Recent trading near its 52-week high demonstrates positive market sentiment and potential momentum in the business.

Considerations

Performance Food Group faces exposure to economic cyclicality and inflation-driven cost pressures, which can compress margins.
Competitive pressures in the food distribution sector could limit pricing power and growth opportunities for the company.
The company operates in a highly fragmented industry, posing execution risks related to integration and operational scalability.

Why invest with Nemo?

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Church & Dwight vs Performance Food Group

About The Companies

Comparison Snapshot

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

Investment Analysis

Church & Dwight

Pros

Considerations

Performance Food Group

Pros

Considerations

Why invest with Nemo?

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

Church & Dwight vs Celsius

Church & Dwight vs Coca-Cola FEMSA

Church & Dwight vs IFF

Frequently asked questions

About The Companies

Comparison Snapshot

Church & Dwight vs Performance Food Group

About The Companies

Comparison Snapshot

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

Investment Analysis

Church & Dwight

Pros

Considerations

Performance Food Group

Pros

Considerations

Why invest with Nemo?

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

Church & Dwight vs Celsius

Church & Dwight vs Coca-Cola FEMSA

Church & Dwight vs IFF

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary difference between a consumer staples company and a distribution business when comparing Church & Dwight (stock_1) and Performance Food Group (stock_2)?

How should I interpret a stock's year-on-year revenue growth when comparing these two firms?

What does it mean if one stock trades above sector averages on valuation metrics?

How should I weigh growth prospects against recent performance in this comparison?

What role do ROA and invested capital play in assessing these two stocks?

How does external market volatility affect a consumer staples stock like stock_1 differently from a distribution company like stock_2?

What does 52-week high indicate for stock_2, and how reliable is it as a signal?

When reviewing the pros and cons you provided, how should I compare it to a company’s overall risk profile?

How should a beginner use this page to form a neutral view on both stocks?

What is the educational takeaway behind evaluating both a consumer brands company and a distributor?

Educational disclaimer for readers about these FAQs?

About The Companies

Comparison Snapshot